Comments 1 - 22 of 22 Search these comments
Yup Dan was accusing Fort Wayne of jumping to a conclusion about the lesbians being Ds as there were no "facts" to back up his accusation. The sun may or may not come up tomorrow but the above behavior is a Fact. Unless of course it is "their" (gained through government largess) stuff...
The problem with the Dems & their Socialism is that they haven't gotten all the Rep/Con/Teas off the Big Govt. teat.
Hmmm that fat asshole middle aged dad is pretty bad at math.
He is a D, what is your point?
IOW they are the opposite of Asian.
judging from the size of the national debt, it appears to be a libby trait.
Hmmm that fat asshole middle aged dad is pretty bad at math.
judging from the size of the national debt, it appears to be a libby trait.
Hmmm that fat asshole middle aged dad is pretty bad at math.
Oh yeah? Funny. I didn't know Clinton added to the debt and bush subtracted from it. I must have my math all ass backwards. Damn
IOW they are the opposite of Asian.
Hahaha. He does have the front porch of a white dude not an Asian.
Hahaha. He does have the front porch of a white dude not an Asian.
Not all whites are "math challenged", the Ds hate math because their politics go to shit when they go to do the math on them.
blues own the peaks....u lose.

judging from the size of the national debt, it appears to be a libby trait.
Hmmm that fat asshole middle aged dad is pretty bad at math.
Oh yeah? Funny. I didn't know Clinton added to the debt and bush subtracted from it. I must have my math all ass backwards. Damn
blues own the peaks....u lose.
Nice, damning evidence.
Albeit in the case F(ucking)DR and L(fucking)BJ they gave the gift that keeps on giving so their legacy does not show up on the graph. The same will be true of the current treasure in the white house.
as witnessed below, you already have!!!
I won't even waste my time on the idiocy of your statement

Notice how Clinton was reigned in under Gingrich.
Reagan was not all he was cracked up to be, but Tip Oneil had more to do with that graph than Reagan, as he was a lying asshole.
Both Bushes were war mongers, no better than the Ds.
Both Bushes were war mongers, no better than the Ds.
So because they started wars, they are excused? I do find it interesting that the GOP, when working with a D, balanced the budget. Then when the GOP got an R, they fucked it all up for good.
How about Truman, Kennedy, Johnson, Carter, Clinton? I'd like to hear the excuses...
So because they started wars, they are excused?
No they are not excused, fuck both of them. Going to Iraq and going back were both bullshit and both to help their defense contractor buddies.
How about Truman, Kennedy, Johnson, Carter, Clinton? I'd like to hear the excuses...
How could Truman not reduce the budget?
Kennedy wasn't around very long.
Johnson did more damage than all the rest combined, he forced Nixon to go off Bretton Woods because of Vietnam, and his legacy of the biggest Ponzi scheme of all in medicare.
Clinton gave us an improved version of the CRA which led to the melt down (regardless of what the mutts think) but largely was held harmless because of Gingrich. BTW he did give us the repeal of Glass Steagal. At least he did not start any wars.
Carter was not as bad as the Rs claim, again 1 term, most his damage came in the form of new Fed agencies that made what ever they were in charge of worse or were just an expense with no result. Dept of education and it's latest Obama flavor, perversion of the knowledge of future generations called common core. Or the Dept of Energy whose sole purpose was to get us off of foreign dependency on oil, it has been around about 40 yr, 0 change of dependency (don't count the current improvement due solely to the market) on oil at a cost of billions employing 10s of thousands.
That's quite a few asterisks :)
So because they started wars, they are excused?
No they are not excused, fuck both of them. Going to Iraq and going back were both bullshit and both to help their defense contractor buddies.
word. you think jeb has a chance in 2016?
That's quite a few asterisks :)
Gawd we are some of dumbest somabitches around, soon to remove ourselves from the gene pool, for voting for these sociopaths. Just a modicum of economic education would do wonders.
word. you think jeb has a chance in 2016?
I think that the Bushes and the Clinton's time has passed, it is a different zeitgeist today. Someone posted recently that millennials are less D than before. It will be the Rs turn unless the RNC screws the pooch again with someone like McCane. They will likely have control of both houses. If and a big if that they don't start another fucking war. Maybe Rand Paul? obviously my choice...
Maybe Rand Paul? obviously my choice...
Honestly 4-8 years ago, whodathunk he would be the candidate of choice? But I agree he should be frontrunner as of today.
Honestly 4-8 years ago, whodathunk he would be the candidate of choice? But I agree he should be frontrunner as of today.
You could say the same of Obama
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,351,348 comments by 15,724 users - clambo, Patrick online now