3
0

What Happened?


               
2015 Apr 26, 9:33am   22,468 views  49 comments

by Dan8267   follow (4)  

Reddit

My grandpa worked at grocery store and made enough money to raise a family in Santa Monica. I work at a grocery store, and I can't even afford to rent a room in LA. What happened?

What happened is that, despite worker productivity quadrupling, the distribution of the wealth has shifted so far away from the wealth producers and to the owner class that it more than offsets the increase in productivity.

Comments 1 - 20 of 49       Last »     Search these comments

1   mell   2015 Apr 26, 9:39am  

What happened is that the dollar has been devalued to the hilt and its devaluation (i.e. printing of money, issuing of debt) was used to prop up the most "connected" (corrupt) sectors such as healthcare, housing and farming, which also happen to serve the essential needs of everyone. Gotta wait til the next crash.

2   Ceffer   2015 Apr 26, 9:44am  

300 percent more people crowding into the coastal areas than when grandpa was around?

3   Dan8267   2015 Apr 26, 11:05am  

Ceffer says

300 percent more people crowding into the coastal areas than when grandpa was around?

True, but those 300% more people are still each 4 times as productive leading to 1200% as much wealth, so it does not explain the drop in quality of life.

4   Dan8267   2015 Apr 26, 11:08am  

mell says

What happened is that the dollar has been devalued to the hilt and its devaluation

True, currency debasement steals wealth from the poor and the middle class and gives it to the rich, but for the guy living paycheck-to-paycheck that doesn't matter because he has no savings. So it still does not explain why the grandson can't live off his salary doing the same thing that his grandfather did and raised a family with.

5   Bellingham Bill   2015 Apr 26, 11:51am  

It's not the devaluing dollar, the Trilateral Commission, or teh joos that is causing high real home prices in LA, it's simply supply & demand unbalance aka Market Failure.

Housing is *the* major life expense, and all this money isn't going into just the sticks & bricks but rather the actual deeded exclusive perpetual (for fee simple tenancy) right to use the land and housing good itself. To secure this right one has to outbid everyone else who wants this deeded right, and supply is limited if not fixed and demand is unbounded (everyone would like to own the whole world if they could).

The good side of the LA basin got filled up before I was born, and I'm getting old now!

There's been a lot of infill development, but not enough!

What I rented for $700 in 90025 in 1991 now rents for $2300! This is simply because supply of quality housing (or even shitty housing) hasn't kept up with Gen Y arriving on the rental market. Gen Y really started rolling in 1990, so they're turning 25 this year. The median Gen Yer is age 22!

Complicating matters is that since I last lived there in 1992, the crappy neighborhoods -- 80% of the land area -- have expanded more. Downtown has gentrified a bit but not enough to make a difference in the supply picture.

https://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/CALOSA7POP

6   mell   2015 Apr 26, 1:04pm  

Bellingham Bill says

It's not the devaluing dollar, the Trilateral Commission, or teh joos that is causing high real home prices in LA, it's simply supply & demand unbalance aka Market Failure.

2008 the rents dropped to almost half of what they are today, same for house prices. Sure there is a growing population, but it's effects are lesser on the price (more people will live under one roof then). Can't spot the bubble? When the Fed announced they were buying MBS for an unlimited time until further notice and depressing rates to near zero that was a starting short for the big boys as well as small speculators to bid up houses again, roll over the debt for next to nothing until they get their desired payout, and for the banks to give mortgages to everybody, putting immense pressure on this sector. Without the MBS purchasing program and 6%+ interest rates house prices and rents would look much differently. The dollar was purposely devalued to support a few sectors.

7   mell   2015 Apr 26, 1:08pm  

Dan8267 says

True, currency debasement steals wealth from the poor and the middle class and gives it to the rich, but for the guy living paycheck-to-paycheck that doesn't matter because he has no savings. So it still does not explain why the grandson can't live off his salary doing the same thing that his grandfather did and raised a family with.

When talking about today's lower wage jobs such as grocery store workers it is likely that increased influx from women, students (student debt anyone?) - possibly with largely useless degrees - and (to a lesser extent) immigrants has put enormous pressure on the demand for these types of jobs, therefore reducing the salary.

8   Reality   2015 Apr 26, 2:56pm  

Inflation is a process that transfers wealth to those who get the new money first from those who get it later. The grocers get the money late after the money has already gone around multiple rounds in the economy.

Also, grandpa's wage at the grocery store paid not only his labor but also grandma's labor at home cooking and cleaning at home in order to enable grandpa working at the store. Nowadays, your wife/girlfriend/hookup partner is supposed to be a strong and independent woman getting paid by her own employer. LOL!

9   Reality   2015 Apr 26, 3:02pm  

Bill, if it makes you feel better as a multi-decade renter, those who bought in Detroit in the 1980's and those who bought in Tokyo in the 1980's (perhaps even your land lord) are even worse off than you are now.

People who bought in LA and NYC are like having invested in the successful companies owning the right set of patents. The usual anti-development policies advocated by the usual left only make the market position of the owners even stronger.

10   anonymous   2015 Apr 26, 5:40pm  

True, but those 300% more people are still each 4 times as productive leading to 1200% as much wealth, so it does not explain the drop in quality of life.

Are grocery store workers really 4 times more productive?

11   Dan8267   2015 Apr 26, 5:49pm  

errc says

Are grocery store workers really 4 times more productive?

Workers in general are. In any case, today's grocery store workers are at least somewhat more productive than those of 70 years ago with laser scanners, electronic payment, and large-scale grocery stores. They certainly aren't less productive.

12   Dan8267   2015 Apr 26, 5:51pm  

mell says

When talking about today's lower wage jobs such as grocery store workers it is likely that increased influx from women, students (student debt anyone?) - possibly with largely useless degrees - and (to a lesser extent) immigrants has put enormous pressure on the demand for these types of jobs, therefore reducing the salary.

Which is just a fancy way of saying that the owner class is taxing the wealth producers (workers) an even more outlandish percentage of their wealth production than two generations ago. Saying supply and demand isn't a justification, moral or economic, for something. They aren't magic words that cause fundamental reasons to become inconsequential.

13   bob2356   2015 Apr 26, 8:46pm  

mell says

2008 the rents dropped to almost half of what they are today

Where exactly was that at?

14   mell   2015 Apr 26, 8:50pm  

bob2356 says

mell says

2008 the rents dropped to almost half of what they are today

Where exactly was that at?

San Francisco bay area. The have roughly doubled since then. They would have increased somewhat via an organic recovery anyways, but at least 50% of the increase is due to the Fed buying MBS and suppressing rates. Speculators and big boys have been loading up on RE as soon as ZIRP and QE/MBS buying was decided. They will also have no qualms getting rid of non-performing debt as soon as the next crash hits. Rinse and repeat.

15   bob2356   2015 Apr 26, 9:44pm  

mell says

bob2356 says

mell says

2008 the rents dropped to almost half of what they are today

Where exactly was that at?

San Francisco bay area. The have roughly doubled since the

So you are back where you started at? Hopefully you put the savings to work.

16   mell   2015 Apr 26, 9:55pm  

bob2356 says

So you are back where you started at? Hopefully you put the savings to work.

I put some into the stock market as soon as I heard that QE was a done deal. People should not be forced to play the markets in order to keep up with inflation though. Inflation is the only thing central banks actually deliver on. The CPI is worthless because it is no wonder that you see low/muted inflation for the broader basket after everything has been eaten up by raging inflation in the essentials (housing, healthcare, food and education/childcare). Hey, even gas prices are shooting up again.

17   lostand confused   2015 Apr 27, 5:19am  

Well, if you have an iphone, you can exchange it for a house in Detroit.

18   tatupu70   2015 Apr 27, 7:08am  

mell says

Absolutely 100%, because the jobs that survive and the new ones that are slowly created are the ones that are durable and add value, you will break the ever wilder boom bust cycle. Sound money is key.

lol--that is pure BS. A LOT of jobs that don't survive add more value than the ones that do survive. Sound money is a distraction like I said. It has absolutely nothing to do with the mess we're in. The boom-bust cycle we're in is because of wealth disparity. Fix that by going back to the policies and structure of the 1960s economy and we'll be fine.

mell says

Nope, in this globalized world you see inflation in goods that are easily shipped around the world within days. How was there deflation in 2008 then before the stick-save? The "structural imbalances" are created by the policies of the central banks and the government bailouts. If we had let 2008 play out, there wouldn't be 50% of every dollar be going to the top 10% right now.

There was deflation because people were defaulting on debt. If we let 2008 play out, the rich would have bought even more of the assets, so you're right--it wouldn't be 50% of every dollar going to the rich, it would probably be more like 60-70% of every dollar.

19   control point   2015 Apr 27, 8:40am  

Dan8267 says

True, currency debasement steals wealth from the poor and the middle class and gives it to the rich, but for the guy living paycheck-to-paycheck that doesn't matter because he has no savings.

Isn't this a contradiction? The rich, almost by definition, have all of the savings. If currency debasement destroys savings wealth, wouldn't it affect those with the most savings most, while affecting those with little (or no) savings least?

I generally agree with you but I have always scratched my head about your opinions on central banking and reconciling with your other thoughts.

20   dublin hillz   2015 Apr 27, 9:41am  

control point says

Isn't this a contradiction? The rich, almost by definition, have all of the savings. If currency debasement destroys savings wealth, wouldn't it affect those with the most savings most, while affecting those with little (or no) savings least?

Middle class has savings too and they would be crushed in high inflation environment. The working stiff while living check to check will still get hurt by inflation because their wages (especially when taxes are taken into account) will not keep up with increasing prices so cumulatively they will be worse off as time goes on. Meanwhile the rich have most of their wealth in stocks and will beat inflation anyway as they pass on price increases to customer. So middle class and the poor will get hurt the most in that world.

Comments 1 - 20 of 49       Last »     Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   users   suggestions   gaiste