Comments 1 - 3 of 3 Search these comments
LOL, so true, reifying the intelligence like that.
It was all neocon agitprop BS to me going in, but I did expect the US would find something, anything, to justify the invasion on "WMD" grounds.
Actual nerve agents from Russia or something, CW labs, not just 20 year-old CW rounds we sold him in the 80s . . .
They left out the part where the CIA found no evidence of Saddam supporting al Qaeda, and found little likelihood of WMDs, so Cheney built a separate one-time intelligence bureaucracy to "discover" those particular "findings", as he was not happy with the CIA's politically-incorrect conclusions.
Actual nerve agents from Russia or something, CW labs, not just 20 year-old CW rounds we sold him in the 80s . . .
Errrrrrkkkk. I'm posssessed by the spirit of another Pat.net user:
"You libbys are all wrong!!!11!Elventy! We found plenty of chemical munitions buried deep in the desert. Veterans are getting sick from the decayed munitions they handle, which proves it!! Saddam had WMDs, and the Liberal MSM lied!!111!
It says Libby on the Label!!!"
?1432297808