Comments 1 - 7 of 7 Search these comments
Does the First Amendment trump "violating the registration requirements for an aircraft and violating national defense airspace"?
Not a chance he can successfully argue that he had no other (and legal) means of expressing his views.
The mere fact that a plea deal was offered means that the prosecutor is worried that he may not be able to impanel a jury that would convict. After all, would you convict this guy? And yes, CiC and Strategist would, but they are outliers. It takes 12 votes to convict a person in 'Murica.
I can't see convicting him of anything that requires jail time. A fine, perhaps, but certainly not jail.
It looks like the government is only interested in saving face and thinks it can do so by convicting him.
The mere fact that a plea deal was offered means that the prosecutor is worried that he may not be able to impanel a jury that would convict. After all, would you convict this guy? And yes, CiC and Strategist would, but they are outliers. It takes 12 votes to convict a person in 'Murica.
I sure would. You do not want a precedence that makes it easy to target American politicians.
American politicians being targeted........cough cough....a couple of drinks might change my mind.
The mere fact that a plea deal was offered means that the prosecutor is worried that he may not be able to impanel a jury that would convict.
Federal prosecutions are rigged show trials. They overcharge radically to terrorize defendants into pleading guilty.
Well over 90% do!
If you dare to go to trial they have a 90% conviction rate.
So, you see, they are never wrong.
Damn that Obama! He should have shot down that gyro-copter,it could have been a Saudi & could have taken out three buildings.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/06/22/us-usa-security-gyrocopter-idUSKBN0P22B120150622
It would be interesting to see this go to trial. Does the First Amendment trump "violating the registration requirements for an aircraft and violating national defense airspace"?