« First « Previous Comments 41 - 80 of 95 Next » Last » Search these comments
Strictly speaking, "sea level" always remains the same, as it is the reference height from which all other land masses are measured.
No you're the retard the sea level is the exact same now as it was when I first looked at Hollywood Beach even if the coast line is moving.
Actually, See levels usual rise the most during puberty, but level out somewhat in your early 20's....
See levels have already risen 20 cm since 1880
I love when this happens in the same paragraph....
My god, you are so fucking stupid.
If sea levels are rising, then land mass levels are falling.
This is a good thing for the elimination of high altitude sicknesses....
Name one major airport that has changed it's 'true altitude' reference point due to 'sea levels rising'....
uh huh...didn't think you could...
Sea levels are increasing at a faster rate today than over the last century and is continuing to accelerate.
Shall I continue? Follow the money, indeed.
So you're suggesting that everyone believes Global warming is a bunch of hooey because a couple rich guys gave a couple of rich guys money to figure out ways to poltically beat the Political Science machine?
This isn't a battle over Science it's a war over the Voodoo Witch Doctor against the Exorcist.
So you're suggesting that everyone believes Global warming is a bunch of hooey because a couple rich guys gave a couple of rich guys money to figure out ways to poltically beat the Political Science machine?
This isn't a battle over Science it's a war over the Voodoo Witch Doctor against the Exorcist.
I agree it isn't a battle of science. The science is settled. It's a battle of big corporate money brainwashing folks like you and CIC vs. the sane population.
Yup I'm brainwashed just little ole me sitting in my room with my wall mounted TV that the plug fell out of the back of about 4 months ago and I can't be bothered putting the plug back in.
Because if I do, I'll just catch shows I have to turn off right away, or switch channels as fast as I can when Liberal PSA's come on, telling me how evil I am, and how great thugs and gay people are.
I cut the cable cord 4 years ago because of the same thing. I've been content with OTA television because up until recently they did a pretty good job of not broadcasting Liberal comon core entertainment.
Liberals got a lot of fucking gall to talk about Brainwashing.
Yup I'm brainwashed just little ole me sitting in my room with my wall mounted TV that the plug fell out of the back of about 4 months ago and I can't be bothered putting the plug back in.
Because if I do, I'll just catch shows I have to turn off right away, or switch channels as fast as I can when Liberal PSA's come on, telling me how evil I am, and how great thugs and gay people are.
I cut the cable cord 4 years ago because of the same thing. I've been content with OTA television because up until recently they did a pretty good job of not broadcasting Liberal comon core entertainment.Liberals got a lot of fucking gall to talk about Brainwashing.

How's this working out?
Wow, this thread is chock-full of conservative stupidity. Maybe there needs to be an IQ test and licensing to use the Internet.
That has been successful for the Ostriches, they have managed so survive millions of years, without going the way of their long list of predators.
Like the sabre tooth tigers. The ones that stopped to listen to the Lions shit got gobbled up in the bureaucracy of the lion pride.
So YES! I'm quite content to sit quietly at home and not being bombarded by Liberal filth, after a long day of having to tread through a minefield of it.
God forbid that every now and then the government puts research money in to real problems ?
Government grants gave us rockets for space missions and military, same for most other defense related technology, and a lot of electronics. Even the internet development and the human genome research was funded by government grants.
Guess what ? People were making money from grants on each and every one of these, and countless others, even including drug and medical research that gave profits to private industry. But it was all real. What kind of retard thinks that because the government spends money on this that it's therefore false ? Even the stupidest idiot on Patrick.net must know that if it is real, the government would be funding a lot of research on it.
So how do these retards logically conclude that government money means it's bs ?
Wow, this thread is chock-full of conservative stupidity. Maybe there needs to be an IQ test and licensing to use the Internet.
Here we see that millennial tolerance thing in action.
Even the stupidest idiot on Patrick.net must know that if it is real, the government would be funding a lot of research on it.
Look, the government has put money into you, since you live off of the taxpayer's dime.. Look what they got!
I stand corrected.
Here we see that millennial tolerance thing in action.
Why should stupidity be tolerated?
You know who else thought certain people were stupid?
Hitler
Stalin
Pol Pot
the Kim clan
General Custer...
You know who else thought marriage was important? Or that raping babies was wrong? Or that crops should be grown?
Hitler
Stalin
Pol Pot
the Kim clan
General Custer...
Just because someone evil believes X does not mean X is evil.
Thank you for demonstrating how stupid conservatives are.
What about Dyson, quite a skeptic and some qualifications to show? It was hard to find an article that exactly used his words and not the journalists opinion/spin, but he sounds very skeptical on the matter.
How do you know something is stupid?
When thousands of independent lines of evidence all verify one conclusion and conservatives ignore all that evidence, that's stupidity.
When thousands of independent lines of evidence all verify one conclusion and conservatives ignore all that evidence, that's stupidity.
This is off the top of a google search:
There is no consensus
The Petition Project features over 31,000 scientists signing the petition stating "There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide will, in the forseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere ...". (Petition Project)
https://www.skepticalscience.com/global-warming-scientific-consensus.htm
So you are replacing the word evidence with the word consensus. The problem is that that ain't science.
There is no consensus
The article you referenced demonstrated that the statement "There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide will, in the forseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere" is a lie.
So you are replacing the word evidence with the word consensus.
No, I'm talking about the thousands of independent lines of evidence from around the world that prove man-made climate change is happening. To deny all the evidence is the very definition of stupidity.
There is literally more evidence and harder evidence that man-made climate change is happening than there is that George Washington fought on the side of the American colonies during the American revolution. Think about how retarded you would look if you argued that George Washington was fighting for the British, and then multiply that by a thousand.
Well Dan, you've proven to us beyond a shadow of a doubt that Global Warming is all about the science and there's NO politics involved at all.
There are sane people, who regardless of politics acknowledge the indisputable science that climate change, including global warming, is happening. Then there are batshit crazy conservatives who deny truth, even scientific truth, because of politics. Of course there's politics involved and it's all on your moron side. But there is no politics in the science and there is no science in your politics.
There is literally more evidence and harder evidence that man-made climate change is happening than there is that George Washington fought on the side of the American colonies during the American revolution. Think about how retarded you would look if you argued that George Washington was fighting for the British, and then multiply that by a thousand.
These are lines of consensus not science.
The so-called petition has been thoroughly debunked many times including on other PatNet threads. For anyone to consider repeating that lie shows lack of character and illustrates why no one should ever listen to conservatives.
You argue like a 6-year old having a temper tantrum. Every time.
As the parent of a 6 year old I can concur.
No dumbass, that is simply the Wogster projecting.
Wow, CIC is in full circle jerk mode. He's following the principle that if you repeat a lie enough it becomes the truth, and like a madman laughing at everybody else as they shake their heads in pity of his insanity. Just remember kids, this is what happens to your mind when you listen to conservative media and vote Republican.
CIC, you can lie all you want, but that doesn't change the facts.
1. Man-made climate change has been proven by thousands of independent lines of evidence.
2. Fact 1 is acknowledged by 99% of climate scientists.
3. The public that acknowledges climate change does so because of the consensus of science and are not motivated by politics.
4. The public that denies climate change are motivated by politics and greed.
Your constant spouting of verbal diarrhea on this subject matter just demonstrates how much of an idiot you are and why your posts on any subject should not merit any consideration.
Everyone else should take a good look at you to see the type of person who denies climate change and supports every harmful Republican effort. Of course, you cannot refuse the temptation to repeat your lies, so take the last word. Everything you've ever said on this matter has already been refuted.
1. Man-made climate change has been proven by thousands of independent lines of evidence.
2. Fact 1 is acknowledged by 99% of climate scientists.
3. The public that acknowledges climate change does so because of the consensus of science and are not motivated by politics.
4. The public that denies climate change are motivated by politics and greed.
ROFL
ROFL
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
Right now, the dumber members of our species are still stuck on step one. Climate change denial has become a litmus test for identifying stupid people.
I woke up this morning in San Diego, less than a mile from the bay, and I was cold. You guys keep saying this is true, and my nutz keep shinking into my stomach.
Maybe if you all come down to my house in private jets(just like real climate change crusaders), form a circle around my house, and simultaneously spout every article based on faked NOAA data, the hot air might keep my hanging low and warm like real global warming should.
CIC, you can lie all you want, but that doesn't change the facts.
1. Man-made climate change has been proven by thousands of independent lines of evidence.
2. Fact 1 is acknowledged by 99% of climate scientists.
3. The public that acknowledges climate change does so because of the consensus of science and are not motivated by politics.
4. The public that denies climate change are motivated by politics and greed.Your constant spouting of verbal diarrhea on this subject matter just demonstrates how much of an idiot you are and why your posts on any subject should not merit any consideration.
Everyone else should take a good look at you to see the type of person who denies climate change and supports every harmful Republican effort. Of course, you cannot refuse the temptation to repeat your lies, so take the last word. Everything you've ever said on this matter has already been refuted.
And this boys and girls is known as a tautology...
First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
ROFL. you're a clown.
please tell me when the world will end due to climate change? do you have a year in mind?
you sound like a fucking cult member prepping for mass suicide.
You need a better dictionary.
The one I use is accurate
Though the same can't be said for your comprehension skills.
Seriously though, humans activities are infinitesimal in their impact on the temperature or weather of our planet. It's a testimony to our arrogance and self-centeredness that we believe our activities have any impact on things so far out of our control. If you want information this article seems to be more accurate than most:
http://spectator.org/articles/55208/false-alert-global-warming
How on earth does that counter the vast body of scientific research that has been done by climatologists the world over? This is exactly what I find ridiculous about the posts on here. You find one article, one scientist (invariably not working in the actual field) etc. and you then accept that unsupported argument as fact despite the mountain of research that says they are wrong. You're just demonstrating an absurd mixture of stupidity and arrogance.
Though the same can't be said for your comprehension skills.
they tell me that I'm not easily indoctrinated. I'm not the one with suspect comprehensions skills.
« First « Previous Comments 41 - 80 of 95 Next » Last » Search these comments
Nope
https://www.nEQghbA3pLM