patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,198,793 comments by 14,148 users - Patrick, The_Deplorable online now
US Proxy War in Syria Becoming Less Proxy and More War
invite response
2015 Dec 7, 3:52pm 5,145 views 11 comments
Comments 1 - 11 of 11 Search these comments
Tenpoundbass
2015 Dec 7, 4:00pm
Obama reminds me more everyday of Jerry Lundegaard.
He can't fuck people and countries over without getting screwing him self with the sloppy transparent evidence.
MisdemeanorRebel
2015 Dec 7, 4:07pm
Isn't it amazing? Bombing is supported by "Progressive" and "Conservative" - but putting a temporary halt to MENA immigration is "Fascist".
What kind of world do we live in?
lalalala
2015 Dec 7, 4:25pm
According to the article, US led coalition forces bombed a Syrian army camp
Who said it was our forces? Where is the proof? It could be some kind of "little green men" or some such.
FortWayne
2015 Dec 7, 4:27pm
Isn't it amazing? Bombing is supported by "Progressive" and "Conservative" - but putting a temporary halt to MENA immigration is "Fascist".
What kind of world do we live in?
Bombing makes those who sell bombs a lot of money. Halting terrorists from entering our country doesn't make anyone important any money, so they don't care for it. We the people got no fucking say in this at all! None at all!
NuttBoxer
2015 Dec 7, 4:27pm
Who said it was our forces? Where is the proof? It could be some kind of "little green men" or some such.
As I mentioned it was "coalition" forces, led by the US. Apparently Syria made a complaint about it to the UN, I'd confirm using their records.
MisdemeanorRebel
2015 Dec 7, 10:30pm
Regime change is illegal Fascistic behavior, too. But that is what Yinon called for over 30 years ago. And we are led around, to ww3, by Israel.
Let me help you.
Yinon's 1982 Article on conquering half the Middle East for Israel is to Israeli Policy Today (if Ever)
as
Soldier of Fortune Mag in 1980s on re-invading Rhodesia and claiming it for the Whites:US African Policy Today (if ever)
Yinon was never a member of the Israeli Government. He was a journalist and lecturer of the far, far right but never came close to the least whiff of power.
Yinon's single article is the new Protocols of the Elders of Zion, where conspiracy theories match every moment of Arab instability or regime change with the "Yinon Plan".
Back when there was actually serious discussion of splitting Iraq, more than 10 years ago, into constitutent Kurdish, Sunni, and Shi'a states, the same Conspiracy Theorists that today see Zionism behind every combination of Alawite, FSA, and ISIS, said "Aha, as shown in Yinon's plan - Zionist Plot!"
MisdemeanorRebel
2015 Dec 7, 10:37pm
The remnants and essence of Yinon are in the regime change doctrine implemented in Syria, Libya, Egypt (fail), and Iraq.
Please explain how a single article by a single journalist is evidence of an official Israeli Policy.
MisdemeanorRebel
2015 Dec 7, 11:00pm
Oded Yinon was a member of the Israeli government before going to work for Haaretz or somebody like that.
Not Haaretz. Some minor Likudnik publication put out by a group called "Kivunim". Translated by Israel Shahak, a rabid anti-Zionist and Communist praised by David Duke.
As for working in the Foreign Ministry, I can find no source except claims by Anti-Zionist, Islamist and Palestinian sources. He was opposed to Camp David, yet it happened anyway and the Sinai was returned to Egypt.
Note the title is "A Strategy for Israel in the Nineteen Eighties". 1982 was 33 years ago. Sure doesn't look like Israel has expanded it's control over new territory since then.
Again, a good match for this is comparing some ultrahawkish 1980s article about "US in the 80s: attacking the Soviet Union to reunite East and West Germany" published in some John Bircher magazine. Even if the author was some kind of assistant undersecretary in the State Department, means nothing to US Policy.
It would be even more ridiculous if somebody used that article from 30+ years ago to explain Russia-US relations today, and countless anti-American publications ran it as if it was a "Secret Glimpse into long term US Strategy".
lalalala
2015 Dec 8, 10:38am
As I mentioned it was "coalition" forces, led by the US. Apparently Syria made a complaint about it to the UN, I'd confirm using their records.
Hot air. There is no proof or it would be provided to the media. Which it wasn't.
NuttBoxer
2016 Jan 27, 9:58pm
Hot air. There is no proof or it would be provided to the media. Which it wasn't.
LIke the media I linked to in my original post, and here:
http://www.telesurtv.net/english/news/U.S.-led-Coalition-Airstrikes-Kill-Syrian-Military-Personnel-20151207-0004.html
That was so obvious and easy to point out you either don't know what media is, don't know how to click a link, or have made a very ironical use of the term "hot air".
You also seem to have indicated that UN records are not to be believed unless they are released to "the media". What makes state run new such a beacon of truth that it easily trumps UN reports?
According to the article, US led coalition forces bombed a Syrian army camp
http://www.prisonplanet.com/us-targets-syrian-military.html
This escalation of aggression toward Syria has conveniently occurred right as the US population is distracted by a "terrorist" attack in San Bernadino.