by zzyzzx follow (9)
Comments 1 - 5 of 5 Search these comments
DieBankOfAmericaPhukkingDie says
The 2nd Amendment guarantees every American the right to carry anti-tank weapons and to mount Aegis missile systems on their front and back lawns to combat tyrannical governments, CANNIBAL ANARCHISTS, murderers, burglars and squirrels.
Actually, it does.
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
Now you could make the case that the Second Amendment only applies to "well-regulated militias", not the individual, but our society has adopted this amendment to apply to all individuals. That said, the amendment says "the right of the people to keep and bear arms". Notice the word "arms", not "guns".
The term arms includes all weapons, not just guns. So, if we actually have a Second Amendment right, then that right includes having nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons as well as tanks, attack helicopters, land mines, and ICBMs. The Second Amendment states that there shall be no infringement on the right to bear arms, and that clearly includes what kind of arms you want. Of course, this amendment was passed in a time when the cutting edge military technology was the musket.
If on the other hand, you say that the Second Amendment should only protect the use of some arms, then why the hell draw that line along guns or certain classes of guns? Why not say that firearms aren't included and that you only have the right to bear melee weapons and crossbows? The drawing of a line around firearms or even certain classes of firearms in arbitrary and clearly not what the Second Amendment says.
This is why the Second Amendment should be wholesale repeal and the country should vote on what weapons citizens and the government are respectively allowed to use and under what circumstances. Of course, this will never happen because the last thing the government wants is to let the people decide how the government can behave. That would be crazy talk like "government of the people, for the people, by the people". Only extremist terrorists like the founding fathers talk like that.
Only extremist terrorists like the founding fathers talk like that.
Dan please don't make DieBofA walk thru the full interpretation of his selective logic. It makes their head hurt. If the NRA really believed in the reasoning that they throw at us, they would go to every ghetto in the USA and pass out free handguns.
If the NRA really believed in the reasoning that they throw at us, they would go to every ghetto in the USA and pass out free handguns.
Free handguns is the last thing the NRA wants. They are the marketing department for gun and ammo sellers.
If I can't "bare" a personal nuclear weapon armed drone,fuck all 2nd amendment lovers.
http://www.kirotv.com/news/news/police-assisting-atf-possible-explosive-device-tac/npgF6/
Former soldier charged with having live anti-tank round at Tacoma home
Tacoma, Wash. - A former soldier has been charged with illegally possessing a live anti-tank round at his home in Tacoma, causing the evacuation of a nearby elementary school and an order for nearby residents to lock down inside their homes.
According to charges filed in Pierce County Superior Court, Tracy Worwood kept an AT-4 anti-tank rocket at his home, saying it was given to him as a going away present when he left the Army.
Charges state the 44-year-old claimed he didn't know it was live, and potentially deadly.
The AT-4 is designed to be fired from a shoulder-mounted weapon, penetrate armor, and destroy a tank.
Tacoma police, agents from the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms and soldiers from a U.S. Army explosives disposal team swarmed around Worwood's home on south McKinley street Wednesday after federal authorities were notified about the round.
According to a probable cause affidavit the projectile, designed to fire from a shoulder mounted weapon and pierce armor, "pierced a 3/5 inch thick steel plate†in a protective container when it was destroyed by a bomb squad