Comments 1 - 10 of 50 Next » Last » Search these comments
That's why the entire country must be a gun-free zone. Allowing guns any place means the plague will spread. Treat guns like narcotics. Zero tolerance.
After the sit in, Republicans will pass a funding bill to make sure all terrorist can afford "arms".
Liberal playbook.
1) Disarm law abiding citizens
2) Arm criminals
3) Blame gun ownership for crime and further disarm law abiding citizens.
4) Convince people that only they can protect them from criminals to keep themselves in power.
That's the rough draft there...
Liberal playbook
Disarm everyone who isn't on duty military or police personnel. You cannot tell who is going to be a terrorist, criminal, or crazy. There's a reason we don't let people have nukes and bombs. That same reason applies to guns. Protect actual rights like free speech, privacy, and the right to peacefully assemble, and the right to make legal challenges to state actions.
Conservative playbook
1. Remove all the basic human rights from law biding citizens such as the right not to have your ass and genitals fondled and penetrated against your will, i.e. rape.
2. Pretend that owning one particular kind of murder weapon is a basic human right even though the vast majority of arms are completely illegal and it's so obviously insane to propose making them legal.
3. Arm everyone and hope their not criminals, crazies, or terrorists.
4. When the criminals, crazies, and terrorists you armed kill people with guns, blame the ability to have a private conversation or secure data on an iPhone instead of the gross availability of murder tools.
5. When anyone proposes a common sense measure like not letting people on the terrorist watch list buy guns, call the proposal an assault on liberties and the proposer a no-good liberal.
The NRA and the gun nuts are not there to protect you. They only arrive after the fact, like the cops.
I don't need anyone to protect me, I can protect myself just fine.
1) Disarm law abiding citizens
2) Arm criminals
3) Blame gun ownership for crime and further disarm law abiding citizens.
4) Convince people that only they can protect them from criminals to keep themselves in power.
Absolutely correct.
Liberals may as well ban pressure cookers, vehicles, matches, box knives, air travel, crock pots, fertilizer, gasoline, fireworks, knives, kitchen utensils - including sporks, hammers, any and all tools.... see where this is going?
At this rate, we may as well ban gyms and not allow personal fitness - to limit people from staying in shape. Because, those who are stronger than others are a physical threat to the weak.
Liberals may as well ban pressure cookers, vehicles, matches, box knives, air travel, crock pots, fertilizer, gasoline, fireworks, knives, kitchen utensils - including sporks, hammers, any and all tools.... see where this is going?
And conservatives may as well legalize nuclear weapons for all... see where this is going?
And conservatives may as well legalize nuclear weapons for all... see where this is going?
Bad point. Look at your turd Obama:
"Obama has backed investment in new nuclear delivery systems, upgraded warheads, resilient command networks, and industrial sites for fabricating nuclear hardware that, when added to the expense of maintaining the existing arsenal, will cost $348 billion between 2015 and 2024. At least, that’s what the Congressional Budget Office estimated earlier this year. If the Obama plan continues to be funded by his successors, it will be the biggest U.S. buildup of nuclear arms since Ronald Reagan left the White House."
Comments 1 - 10 of 50 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,364,385 comments by 15,735 users - SouthMtn, TheAntiPanicanLearingCenter online now