patrick.net

Blurtman says

You are shooting at the wrong target.

As if anyone is stupid enough to let you set the target.

Blurtman says

It seems to be a lesson that the unethical constantly miss.

Unethical? That’s rich coming from you. You willfully substitute “rape” for “accusation” for Bill but not for the #DoucheBag. You willfully substitute “rape victims” for Bill’s accusers but not for the DoucheBag’s. You willfully substitute “actual” for “alleged” in Bill’s case but not for the #DoucheBag.

Needs to be cleaned up to be both “more understandable” and less full of bullshit: “Doubts about a rape an accusation is to discrediting and attacking the rape victims accuser as doubts about an actual crime allegation is to thwarting an investigation.”

Now you get this nugget of nothingness, typical of your fictive “journalism”: “Doubts about an accusation is to discrediting and attacking the accuser as doubts about an allegation is to thwarting an investigation?”

I don’t blame you for still nurturing your Bernie Butthurt. Just don’t presume it passes for an objective criticism of the remaining candidates.

Blurtman says

Bill raping women is really not the issue

Correct. But it's your issue because it underlies and underpins your bullshit analogy. If it ain't Bill it ain't Hill and there's no "thwarting", and you're left with your head up your ass. So by saying it's not the issue makes you the fool. What's your target Blurty, fool or head-up-the-ass?