Comments 1 - 6 of 6        Search these comments

1   BayArea   2016 Nov 13, 4:35pm  

for every one of these stories, there are 10 stating that some super predictor with XX years of nailing the results picked Hillary.

Remember, there were two candidates with any real chance of winning. Two choices. Thus it's not so surprising when some predictors got it right lol

2   indigenous   2016 Nov 13, 4:52pm  

BayArea says

for every one of these stories, there are 10 stating that some super predictor with XX years of nailing the results picked Hillary.

Remember, there were two candidates with any real chance of winning. Two choices. Thus it's not so surprising when some predictors got it right lol

None of them have been 100% correct since 96, none of them can be back tested to 1900 with 100% accuracy save one election in 1960.

You might want to actually read the article...

3   Tenpoundbass   2016 Nov 13, 5:20pm  

This guy did come out way earlier in the election with his prediction. CNN just decided to report Nate Silver and only Nate Silver as the indisputed King of Poll phish hooks.

4   HEY YOU   2016 Nov 13, 5:56pm  

Let's let right wing nutz wish he wasn't right.

BOYCOTT Rep/Con/Teas!

5   indigenous   2016 Nov 13, 7:03pm  

BTW 1960 is when Kennedy bought the election. Maybe dead people don't vote in primaries?

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions