patrick.net

You have got to be kidding.

It doesn't strike people like you Odd that neither the Clinton's nor the DNC has bothered to file libel law suits against Trump and the RNC for telling so many whoppers about her over the last 18 months.
And there's been some doozies let me tell you! Had you been watching the same news Hillary and I have been. You should be asking yourself, why isn't there a few hundred law suits being filed against Trump by his slander Victims? Jill Stein don't count.

It is likely that Trump exaggerated quite a bit here, however the evidence of historic voter fraud is real and it is usually in favor of the Democrats - that's why they are fighting so hard any ID laws which are common in most western European countries. The point is another though. Stephanopoulos is exactly that kind of hypocritical stickler people are sick of. If we're talking evidence here then they should have grilled and smoked the shit out of the Clinton campaign for all the fraud that came out of the DNC, the Clinton foundation and more in the Podesta emails. Laws were broken (perjury), yet nobody gave a fuck. Now Trump makes his hip shooting statements and they are salivating all over it and taking the troll-bait every opportunity they can. I can sympathize with people that maintain the stance that these sort of statements are not presidential or worry them - it's definitely a breath of fresh air not suitable for everyone - but only if they at the same time disavow the Clinton campaign, foundation and the DNC for the criminal enterprises they have become. There were plenty of non-criminal candidates and parties out there to cast your vote for. If you supported Clinton and now need a safe space for every Trump tweet you're pointing out to be hyperbole then you're a hypocrite. I mean Donna fucking Brazile came on national TV and said the emails were fabricated and she's been persecuted. At that point anybody supporting such a campaign should have said NO MORE!

mell says

It is likely that Trump exaggerated quite a bit here, however the evidence of historic voter fraud is real and it is usually in favor of the Democrats

No it's likely he's telling the truth and Historic voter fraud was child's play compared to what happened this year.
never before in any election has the President had active policy to churn Citizen applicants like they had this time had this been Bush with some Conservative Russians, Canadians, Haitians, and Nords the Left would have gone bananas. Especially the part where the voter registration booth was right by the exit and those sworn in were implored to vote for Hillary. Never before has there been sanctuary cities that coincide with sinister Voter obscurity in opposition to limiting voter verification as much as possible. Voter rolls were purged, not one single person that was purged filed a law suit. The Liberals took it upon them self to take it to supreme courts and won in many Blue states. There was so much Shenanigans not to mention the sad pathetic display Hillary and the DNC lopsided victory against Bernie and no one was surprised it was rigged from the get go. Not even Bernie and he campaigned for her. Even Trump had to spend tens of millions of dollars in legal wrangling across the country to prohibit a few local delegates voiding out voters votes and deciding the Primary GOP winners.

To scoff at the possibility of a rigged election, when the Left were so certain Hillary was going to win spite Her flaccid campaign rallies and lack of enthusiasm. It just wasn't there.

Had Wiki Leaks not dampened Hillary's resolve to win, with untimely evidence. Hillary would have won. Not because more people would have voted for her. But because the counting would have went on for weeks, there would have not been a call on November 8th. They would have pulled out the provisional votes and dumped them into the mix. In most of the purple and Blue states Trump won.
I believe California was a state that included bogus questionable ballots. They are the tech capitol of the world. For them to drag their ass finalizing the vote. They were trying to inject the Popular vote argument, that's why they went all in with every peice of paper they got from anybody that had Hillary's name on it, and counted it as a vote.

You know California wouldn't want a recount.
They didn't set this easy way to steal the election up for nothing. They had to walk away Trump out classed them.

And it burns Jill Stein's Ass too!

Pence is just taking after trump, saying anything to get a rise out of the left...

mell says

It is likely that Trump exaggerated quite a bit here, however the evidence of historic voter fraud is real and it is usually in favor of the Democrats

Want to present some of the evidence of VOTING fraud and how it affected elections?

bob2356 says

mell says

It is likely that Trump exaggerated quite a bit here, however the evidence of historic voter fraud is real and it is usually in favor of the Democrats

Want to present some of the evidence of VOTING fraud and how it affected elections?

This is a good article besides the PEW report: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/oct/17/no-voter-fraud-isnt-myth-10-cases-where-its-all-to/
Basically it debunks the myth of the myth, but, while there seems to be evidence for a solid slant towards the democrats, the extent in numbers is not known. Hence my suspicion of exaggeration, but clearly not a lie.