patrick.net

Booger says

How does a human get that way? Seriously. That's eating every hour and getting a midnight snack. Her toilet has to look like ass lava.

I'll be direct. Why is that thing even alive? Can't produce anything physically. Drain on the healthcare system. Backbreaker for EMT's when her fat ass can't get up. Harsh, but if there's an emergency call, probably should just let her die.

WookieMan says

Why is that thing even alive?

Pffft... Because it's Gorlock the Destroyer obviously.

Maga_Chaos_Monkey says

Pffft... Because it's Gorlock the Destroyer obviously.

WookieMan says

Why is that thing even alive?

Which is more than can be said for the people she ate.

HeadSet says

Which is more than can be said for the people she ate

I think Gorlock may be a he? Or at least was born that way.

AI:

Gorlock The Destroyer's Gender
Based on the provided search results, Gorlock the Destroyer is a transgender influencer who has publicly discussed their gender identity. According to the search results, Gorlock the Destroyer has come out as transgender and has spoken about their desire to find someone who can handle traditionally masculine traits.

DOGEWontAmountToShit says

Maga_Chaos_Monkey says

Pffft... Because it's Gorlock the Destroyer obviously.

https://gorlockthedestroyer.org/

https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/derangement-syndrome-as-symptom-of

the authoritarian/leftist intersect seems to always focus on individuals and avatars as “prime movers” imbuing movements and times with purpose and doctrine. they do not become fixated upon the positions or the values of that which they oppose so much as the people. the idea of emergent order or opinion is conspicuously absent.

they may care about roe v wade or climate, but it’s always “trump did this” and “musk did that” and always myopia and selective blindness to european standards for abortion or celebrities taking private jets to collect climate awards. there is no consistency nor any seeming whole or holistic framework.

such variance of standard on in group/out group belies a lack of general case logical or ethical thinking or extrapolation from first principles. instead, this collage of viewpoints tends to be tribal allegiance rather than intellectual underpinning. the fact that the tribe has mistaken itself for intellectual and critical (right down to naming their theories after it) makes this far more flagrant. in fact, this is, to great extent what gives rise to the problem:

there is no critical thinking allowed in critical race or gender theory. ...

so what is taught instead is the aping of critical thinking by the rote memorization of case by case tribal position enabling and ennobling what ultimately amount to arbitrary sets of rules to “be in the tribe” and be told you’re a good little boy or girl or whatever dizzyingly complex bespoke pronouned ersatz identity has been foisted upon you.

this elevates a very different sort of person to prominence, captive thinkers and memorizers rather than free thinkers and analyzers.

it’s also simply awful for those who do think critically, a suppressive tour of false education and assessment, a doctrinaire force feeding devoid of nourishment. it drives them away. selection become adverse.

and pretty soon you have a complex system of thought that few (if any) of the individuals who comprise it are capable of actually assessing for accuracy or consistency. everyone is just following some guru who followed some other guru turtles all the way down until just about no one has any ideas what any of this means and a few “bosses” are interpreting everything for everyone with the hyper-prickly exclusionist zeal of medieval popes.

what pervades is not as spirit of inquiry but rather one of inquisition.

meanwhile, such a system is infinitely seductive to low identity followers who form the marrow and musculature of a new sort of cargo clerisy. these are the “upper midwits” who so willingly subsume self to the useful idiocy of playing at tribal teleological enforcer because to gain the coveted hall monitor sash and lord power and position over those smarter than one, all one need do is memorize by rote, regurgitate upon demand, and brook no deviation or dissent. you just learn whatever new word be it “racist” or “sexist” or “fascist” or “transphobe” that has been semantically mapped onto “heretic” and off you go! easy peasy.

the selector is not for intellect but rather for obedience.

as a result this scupper collects all the aspiring head girls and lead boys as it offers the promise of vaulting the lesser up onto the vaunted perches of elite intellect by displacing and discrediting those who belonged there.

perversely, this seems to carry with it an inherent need for the organizing dogmas to be false, even ostentatiously so.

after all, what better way to purge the sound of mind and extensive of vision than to claim that up is down, sideways is straight, and ruin is renovation until no right thinking person can inhabit the hallucinatory landscapes of your contrived cancel culture?

what could be a more perfect strainer to remove competence and accuracy and supplant it with doctrinaire dictatorship than immediately casting anyone who gets the right answer to “how many genders am i holding up, winston?” into the struggle sessions of cancel culture and branding them bigot and oppressor? ...

and so it is natural for them to presume that other ecosystems function likewise. but they don’t. those capable of critical thinking did not go away. they did not stop thinking, they were silenced, buried beneath omerta and proscription. ...

the university as institution has been destroyed and stripped of its original purpose, colonized by weak, useless people, but the purpose itself perseveres persisting and thriving in new environs and ushering in an era of unprecedented access and true popular populism in intellectual, economic, political, and philosophical ideation.

social media is the new academy. ...

the authoritarian left experiences this as assault and erasure, as genocide. they keep doubling down on “but muh credential” and “but all this stuff i memorized” but bringing doctrine to a critical thinking fight is like bringing concrete foot blocks to a game of tag: you just lose. bigly. ...

the whole thing has become wonderfully self defeating, a doubling down on becoming less rational and less consistent and ever more dogmatically demanding with each new interaction with the very critical thought the authority left apes but cannot achieve. each iteration invites and enables the next takedown and weakening of “the campus” yet further.

it’s like fighting ants with jam.

this battle is long since over.

and the fun is just getting going as we retake that which was ours.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/llOBF8O2ppc

Woke Dude RAGES He Can't Change With Women

The violin is a nice touch!

Yes. This idiot blames a crash in Canada on Trump. He even actually acknowledges it is in Canada but then rails about ATC in America getting layoffs that haven't happened.

https://nitter.poast.org/TrumpWarRoom/status/1900912359775879337#m

I think they are MKUltra kickapoo joy juice drug eyes. They were drugged to elevate their cognition and their base abilities. In Tampon Tim, he was resistant except to become a bouncing maniac.

"we are reaching the cognitive breakage point where the intensity of belief
required to sustain the hallucinatory universes that many people have
occupied simply cannot stand up to any more collisions with reality.
as the evidence against it mounts, the magnitude and implausibility of dogma
needed to protect a false world view starts to rise in an exponential fashion.
such a rise rapidly overwhelms people, seemingly out of nowhere because
the last 2 doublings are 75% of the cognitive burden and so you go from
"barely holding it together" to "wildly, ostentatiously out of control" all at once.
buckle up, you're going to see a lot of this.
for a great many people who have been isolated in a great many echo
chambers, the bumpy part of re-entry to reality is starting and the self
appointed "moral majority" coming to terms with the fact that it was never
either of those things is going to cause mass scale breakage.
you're going to see this kind of attack, threat, vandalism, and rage because
when the stories they have told themselves become too absurd to sustain, it's
the only outlet left to externally validated zealots whose external referents
have long been fantasies.
wish i had better news, but it's likely to get worse before it gets better.
you can see how out of control this spirals and how each new mirror or
encounter with reality just sets of the next surge into wild new persecution
theater and savior complex to justify actual violence and to project what’s
going on in the desperate swirling of one’s own mind onto one’s enemies.
suddenly “team luigi” is all about “you’re going to assassinate us!” while they
urge attacks upon anyone they dislike.
TDS is Mental Illness pdf

https://www.kunstler.com/p/there-will-be-boundaries

You don’t negotiate with two-year-olds. You tell them how things are and what sort of behavior is required of them, as plainly and simply as possible. Mr. Trump, having been the father of many two-year-olds over time, appears to get this. It has been apparent for years that Mr. Trump’s symbolic role as a father figure is the most deeply resented feature of his role in US politics.

... the Democratic Party has become the party run by women, and by particular types of women — women who have traded the management of children and households for bureaucratic careerism, women too lacking in feminine appeal to attract mates, women attempting to become the men missing in their lives — and men wishing to become women, or pretending to be women. ...

What is most obviously insane in matters like this, is that the female governor is so eager to punish and humiliate her younger fellow females in order to merely press a political point — that she is the boss of Maine, and nobody can tell her what to do, even if she deranges the cultures of schooling and sports. This illustrates, by the way, a principal difference in the way men’s and women’s brains work. Men typically understand boundaries, where things begin and end. It is a necessary cognitive device for regulating behavior in the household and for acting in the face of danger when required. ...

The whole gestalt of Woke-Jacobin politics is driven by the wish to dissolve boundaries. That is, it is driven by female minds, and what the Woke-Jacobins might call female-adjacent minds. That is why the open border fiasco was another point-of-principle for the Democratic Party — and why “Joe Biden” the phantom president (actually the shadowy figures behind him) pretended that nothing could be done about it.

Mr. Trump demonstrated that was a lie in a New York minute.

Excellent point that there are a lot of unspoken sexual dynamics at play.

Trump is indeed a resented father figure, imposing limits and boundaries on women with a permanently teen mindset.

It's hard to hear what isn't said, but it's always the most important point.

https://removingthecataract.substack.com/p/thought-terminating-cliches

I was recently sampling wine at a tasting room in Placerville, CA, which happened to be located across from the El Dorado County Court House. There was a noisy and peaceful demonstration in progress at the Court House. The signs proffered in protest had simple phrases: Habeas Corpus Counts, Transitioning is Life Affirming, Save DEI, Trump or Musk is Hitler or a Fascist. All of the posters expressed slogans that were intended to elicit an emotional response and were presented as if ideological analysis was unnecessary.

All rhetorical arguments include, either independently or in combination some form of the following three classical components:
1. Ethos, an appeal to authority
2. Pathos, an appeal to emotion
3. Logos, an appeal to logic or reason

The protesters mentioned above relied almost exclusively on pathos. I have noticed a similar trend prevalent in the comment sections of Substack essays or Newspaper articles that allow for comments. Stock phrases are used to define a person’s viewpoint in lieu of reasoned discourse. ...

“The language of the totalist environment is characterized by the thought-terminating cliché. The most far-reaching and complex of human problems are compressed into brief, highly reductive, definitive-sounding phrases, easily memorized and easily expressed. These become the start and finish of any ideological analysis.”

https://removingthecataract.substack.com/p/conjecture-on-extreme-tds

A majority of the voters in the 2024 election saw through the legacy media’s propaganda and lies. They rejected, for a myriad of different reasons, the falsehoods and misrepresentations sermonized within the media’s coverage of the Harris campaign. However, a still significant number of voters supported the Democratic platform. A platform which was primarily focused on hatred of Trump. That animus has not diminished. A Scott Rasmussen's Napolitan News Service poll conducted in April of this year found that 28% of Democrats believed America would be better off if Donald Trump had been assassinated. What is the mental construct that allows for such irrational hate in the first place? How do you rationalize a moral equivalency between opposition to a policy and death for the advocate of that policy? Driven by hatred of the man they consider akin to Hitler, they unquestionably support the opposite position of any Trump policy regardless of how absurd that may be. ...

A moral philosophy without stable boundaries grounded in objectivity has inherent dangers. It can promote selfishness, and foster a disregard for the property, life and liberty of others. It explains why Luigi Mangione who murderer the CEO of a Health Insurance Company is a hero to some. It explains the progressive’s justification for destroying someone else’s Tesla. Counter intuitively, it also explains the manifestation of intolerance to any opinion contrary to one’s own. If relativism is the guiding principle, then fanatical defense of a personal viewpoint is mandatory. It explains why there is a minority cohort locked in by Trump Derangement Syndrome. They are incapable of accepting any truth other than the one they created for themselves, regardless of the fallacies, inconsistencies or outright stupidity of their position.

Relativism breeds political intolerance which is justified by the bias misinformation propagated by the media. Nietzsche also said, “Sometimes people don’t want to hear the truth because they don’t want their illusions destroyed.”

They don't have to report to Bass.

clambo says

They don't have to report to Bass.

Didn’t she added B to her original name!

clambo says

They don't have to report to Bass.

She'll get some activist federal judge to 'enforce' it. Just watch.