3
0

Patrick, these latest changes have made patrick.net user-unfriendly & there are bugs


               
2017 Jan 22, 11:52am   4,717 views  28 comments

by freespeechforever   follow (2)  

Threads are opened by opening separate window, which is awkward on my tablet as I go from one window open, to two windows open.

Often, threads with external links (i.e. with news article link embedded) often don't even allow me to even open thread and see comments, but automatically open new window that goes directly to the article that's been linked.

Thanks.

Comments 1 - 20 of 28       Last »     Search these comments

1   justme   @   2017 Jan 22, 12:05pm  

I observed today

1, different and less bold headline font
2. threads-pop-open-in-new-tab
3. references to underlying links appear in listing

Also recently but maybe not today

4. When editing a comment it would create a duplicate comment of the edit.

Number 2 I find a bit bothersome. I would (before) usually instead reopen a specific thread as a new tab if I needed to stay with it for a while (I currently have about 70 of these accumulated). One of the problem is that the "new" tab will open at the BOTTOM of a long list (I use firefox tree-style-tab with vertical tabs). That could maybe be fixed with a FF or TST setting, but that would affect other default uses.

2   Blurtman   @   2017 Jan 22, 12:23pm  

freespeechforever says

Patrick, these latest changes have made patrick.net user-unfriendly & there are bugs

Agree. The latest makes the site a bit of a chore to use.

3   BayArea   @   2017 Jan 22, 12:29pm  

Not user friendly, please go back

4   Tenpoundbass   @   2017 Jan 22, 12:34pm  

I think the Discussion link needs to be an obvious glyph then it would become apparent the link is the news story and the icon is the comment thread.
Maybe a Comic bubble or something unique only to Patnet. Could be your defining feature. Know any decent branding graphics people?

5   missing   @   2017 Jan 22, 12:40pm  

I don't like the direct link to articles. Prefer to open the comments thread.

6   Dan8267   @   2017 Jan 22, 12:40pm  

freespeechforever says

Threads are opened by opening separate window, which is awkward on my tablet as I go from one window open, to two windows open.

I almost always open threads in a new tab, but I do so by explicitly holding down the control key while clicking. Although it's a minor convenience not to have to hold down control, in general it's a good principle to leave it up to the end user whether or not to open a link in the current tab or another. This means two things. First, never force a new tab in the link. Second, always use a link, not a JavaScript handler as that forces the new page to be opened wherever the handler says, usually the same tab.

The general principle is let your users' decided how to interact with your site.

7   Dan8267   @   2017 Jan 22, 12:42pm  

freespeechforever says

Patrick, these latest changes have made patrick.net user-unfriendly

Another unfriendly change recently is displaying posts by CIC instead of redirecting to his goat porn site.

8   Patrick   @   2017 Jan 22, 1:52pm  

OK, it's a failed experiment.

Titles now point to the patrick.net discussions again.

I kept the external links in parentheses. That should not trip anyone up.

Nothing pops open a new tab anymore.

Thanks for your feedback! More advice?

9   marcus   @   2017 Jan 22, 2:04pm  

FP says

I don't like the direct link to articles

Not so sure it's a failed experiment. THe same issue exists with reddit, but people are used to it. On reddit one linc gives you both and the top link gives you just the image, video or link.

Maybe TPB is right. Try having the two links but somehow sort of at an equal level ? I wouldn't give up on it. I like the idea of a lot of links to things people are sharing. If you do that well. The ideal would be if you have both of these:

1) a place with a lot of good shared content

2) optional discussion tied to the content.

This is what works on reddit, youtube and many other places. So don't give up just becasue of negative feedback form people that find the change difficult.

10   Patrick   @   2017 Jan 22, 2:07pm  

marcus says

Maybe TPB is right. Try having the two links but somehow sort of at an equal level ? I wouldn't give up on it. I like the idea of a lot of links to links to things people are sharing. If you do that well. The ideal would be if you have both of these:

Wow, you guys agree on something?

Can I improve on the way it is now, where the main title is the link to the discussion, but then if there is an external link in the original post, the external host appears in parentheses just after the main title, like this:

Israel approves settlements in new capital, Jerusalem (www.bbc.com)

11   marcus   @   2017 Jan 22, 2:14pm  

rando says

Wow, you guys agree on something?

HE's an idiot savant. With all the work he's probably done on fake news websites, you should respect his opinion on the limited subject of "information architecture."

12   marcus   @   2017 Jan 22, 2:15pm  

rando says

Can I improve on the way it is now, where the main title is the link to the discussion

How about a unique glyph as TPB said, with mousover saying "go directly to linked content" or something to that effect.

13   marcus   @   2017 Jan 22, 2:43pm  

I guess the link on the right showing the top level part of the URL serves that purpose now.

14   Patrick   @   2017 Jan 22, 3:23pm  

I improved the favicon.ico (shows up in bookmarks, etc) by making the background transparent. Now it looks like this:

I could put that on post lists before each title, but maybe it's just clutter and people will figure out there are two links:

post title goes to discussion
(host) in parentheses goes to an external link

15   AllTruth   @   2017 Jan 22, 5:49pm  

rando says

OK, it's a failed experiment.

Titles now point to the patrick.net discussions again.

There remains a link to the hostname of external links. That should not trip anyone up.

Nothing pops open a new tab anymore.

Thanks for your feedback! More advice?

Agreed with OP.

It's much better/easier to use now.

Thanks Patrick.

*block quotes and indentations still aren't functioning 100%

16   marcus   @   2017 Jan 22, 6:03pm  

THe asterisk for making things bold doesn't work inside a bockquote, and never did. For that you still need to use the 'b' tag

17   Patrick   @   2017 Jan 22, 6:12pm  

Ah, thanks for telling me!

test of bold within blockquote

18   Patrick   @   2017 Jan 22, 6:12pm  

wait, worked for me just fine above

19   Blurtman   @   2017 Jan 22, 6:15pm  

rando says

OK, it's a failed experiment.

Always good to try to improve. And wise to listen to your "customers."

20   marcus   @   2017 Jan 22, 6:19pm  

Well, when it didn't work for me, maybe there was something else going on. IT was maybe a week or more back. So I've used the b tag since then in the quote. But the tag is sort of a habit anyway. Easily user error on my part.

Comments 1 - 20 of 28       Last »     Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   users   suggestions   gaiste