« First « Previous Comments 16 - 26 of 26 Search these comments
Patrick, you can sleep well tonight. Split infinitives are not really a broken rule anymore. At least according to MLA and OED, and Chicago Manual of Style et al. agree. It would be interesting to know if they still teach that nonsense in school today.
Woohoo, thanks! Seriously, always hated that rule. I was taught it in high school.
Does you boss only give you projects now that only last 40 mins? Does you boss give you 10 min breaks and snackie breaks every hour?
I suspect that you are being sarcastic, but still I will reply. I don't have a boss who gives me projects. My projects last months, sometimes years. When working in my office, I usually take brakes every half an hour or so. However, I do my best thinking while walking.
Reduce team work in class, focus more on individual work. The latter is what current students are weak at.
Lot of people who go to Med school and get into residency, often suck at the former, which is important in last two years Med school, residency and beyond.
It may be something specific for med school. Or they suck at both :)
This is more or less what is done in India. Of course, many go to school after school to review said topics
From what I've seen, Indians go to after school regardless of what the school curriculum is.
simply babysitting paid for by the state, with education taking a secondary role.
Torturing so many children is a crime against humanity. It is millions of hours of wasted human lives every year.
I absolutely agree. There once was a time where you could accelerate out of school if you were advanced. Back in the day my father graduated high school at 15 and later my older sister graduated after three years of high school. By the time I was in school there were no early options, only dropping out or taking your GED.
Make high school courses something that students and parents consume and shop for.
This makes no sense. People are already funding the schools through their taxes -- why should the parents or kids pay extra for a sub-par education at a public school? Why wouldn't they just go to a charter school or private school instead?
Make high school courses something that students and parents consume and shop for.
This makes no sense. People are already funding the schools through their taxes -- why should the parents or kids pay extra for a sub-par education at a public school? Why wouldn't they just go to a charter school or private school instead?
You TOTALLY misunderstood my point. Yes, it's already paid for, but too many view it as something their kids have to do, rather than a purchased opportunity they should get the most from. Give them a lot of choices - individual choices - tell them the ultimate minimal requirements, pros and cons of different paths and so on, but they make the choices with the understanding their decision is a lot like consumer decisions - it's just that it's already paid for.
I've got a better idea. Make school optional. Remove federal funding for schools and let families, cities and states decide what is mandatory vs optional with respect to education.
Patrick says
We all know from personal experience just how soul-killing the endless hours of middle school and high school can be. To a large degree, school is simply babysitting paid for by the state, with education taking a secondary role.
Torturing so many children is a crime against humanity. It is millions of hours of wasted human lives every year. A better solution would be to give students some reward for learning the material well and quickly. Namely, students should be able to gain the sweet release from the endless drone of a teacher by passing the final exam for the class at any point in the semester.
A student with a passing grade should be liberated to read any subject they like in the library, and to quietly converse (fuck split infinitives) with the other students there. This would be a better education for those students, and the remaining students would have more of the teacher's time to themselves.
Make school optional. Remove federal funding for schools and let families, cities and states decide what is mandatory vs optional with respect to education.
Yes. THat's what we need, an even less informed less intelligent citizenry.
There are many reasons for requiring education. Even economically it's critical that people have the benefit of an education if they are going to be productive members of society. I can see arguing for more choices in how kids are educated, but to deny a child education is child abuse. It's unfair to the child to assume that their working parents have the time or resources to properly educate their kids.
If robots and automation make the economic aspect of education less important for the future - or less critical that people are educated that they might contribute to society in some ways, then it is still essential just in helping them reach their human potential whatever that might be. Don't children deserve that ? I get it that those on the right resent the fact that there are people that want to help children, and they assume they are indoctrinating them somehow in to being leftists(becasue the kind of person that would choose such as career obviously is probably a liberal). But that really is for the most part a myth. Social studies and English teachers (through the discussion of literature) may have some small impact in those directions, but believe it or not there are conservative teachers too, and many subjects are totally apolitical.
They would probably drop out before taking class second time
ACtually in rough areas there are a lot of students, and even in better areas with much better schools there are always some students that don't buy in at all, and or who might be behind with their foundation, e.g. in Math, and so they take algebra 2 or 3 times before passing. For some they just don't care, and they know they can take it again, so why try very hard or worry about it. I'm talking about a certain segment of the population that don't want to be there and don't buy in to it. These are the ones that have the most to gain by realizing it's an opportunity rather than something they are forced to do.
That is one difference between you and I. I trust people to choose if school is in their own best interest or not. Forcing schooling on people who don't want it wastes not only their time but also diminishes the experience for those that do wish to be there and wastes the efforts of the teachers on a race to the lowest common demoninator.
I trust people to choose if school is in their own best interest or not.
LOL That was a good one.
« First « Previous Comments 16 - 26 of 26 Search these comments
We all know from personal experience just how soul-killing the endless hours of middle school and high school can be. To a large degree, school is simply babysitting paid for by the state, with education taking a secondary role.
Torturing so many children is a crime against humanity. It is millions of hours of wasted human lives every year. A better solution would be to give students some reward for learning the material well and quickly. Namely, students should be able to gain the sweet release from the endless drone of a teacher by passing the final exam for the class at any point in the semester.
A student with a passing grade should be liberated to read any subject they like in the library, and to quietly converse (fuck split infinitives) with the other students there. This would be a better education for those students, and the remaining students would have more of the teacher's time to themselves.
patrick.net's 40 proposals