patrick.net

Flynn quit because he made a mistake, and should have known better. Trump asked him to resign. The FBI investigated and found no collusion.

Sessions was a witch hunt. Pure and simple. His response was a PR move. FBI investigated and found no evidence of collusion.

If Russia hacked DNC servers, forensic evidence on their server MAY help prove or disprove the theory. If Russia obviously hacked the DNC, why wont they give up their servers to the FBI?
www.youtube.com/embed/TRHASCfBY_Q

Three possibilities: 1)zero evidence of Russian hacking further suggesting this neo-McCarthyism is a highly illegal political witch hunt 2)more evidence of dark/illegal activity from team Hillary not involving trump, or russia, or this election 3)forensic evidence of the actual hackers, which at best disproves the DNC narrative, at worst shows trump and/or russia was framed.

As Trump delves further into details of the previous administration, he will learn more about their executive overreach. Their constant surveillance of american citizens, foreign leaders including our allied heads of state, and business execs will open up before a POTUS who is an outsider to this international crime gang. Heads will roll.

Its good not to have a criminal in the whitehouse for once in my lifetime.

CBOEtrader says

Flynn quit because he made a mistake, and should have known better. Trump asked him to resign. The FBI investigated and found no collusion.

Sessions was a witch hunt. Pure and simple. His response was a PR move. FBI investigated and found no evidence of collusion.

If Russia hacked DNC servers, forensic evidence on their server MAY help prove or disprove the theory. If Russia obviously hacked the DNC, why wont they give up their servers to the FBI?

www.youtube.com/embed/TRHASCfBY_Q

Three possibilities: 1)zero evidence of Russian hacking further suggesting this neo-McCarthyism is a highly illegal political witch hunt 2)more evidence of dark/illegal activity from team Hillary not involving trump, or russia, or this election 3)forensic evidence of the actual hackers, which at best disproves the DNC narrative, at worst shows trump and/or russia was framed.

As Trump delves further into de...

Well said. The entire "Trump had russia help" started about 2-3 weeks after the election after all the marches did not work.

At issue is, if there was hacking, what were the head of the security agencies doing PRIOR TO THE ELECTION. Obama kicking out the russians after Hillary lost might have been a red herring to stir up a hornets nest for the new president, even under the knowledge of a weakened national security, a weakening of the Russian relations, which Obama had bungled.

Obama so covered up by the gangsters in the leftist media - started playing the "russia helped" soundtrack 2 weeks after the election was over.

I tell you the truth, Benedict Arnold looks honorable in comparison the the Previous Potheadus.

How can any liberal say - that what was in the hacked emails caused this. The emails were actually fairly benign. Some folks were ignored at Chelsea. Hired some operative to go create riots at Trump Convention.

The reason why she lost was the legacy NAFTA job loss that millions were affected by.

The reason why she lost is that she lied about not have classified emails in open server.

The reason why she lost is the anger over State Departments non effectiveness in Ukraine, Syria, ignoring the Chinese threats.

Ask any Republican, Libert, or Democrat if their reasons for voting stemmed from Wikileaks......

Dumb and Dumbercrats..

Entitlemented says

Well said. The entire "Trump had russia help" started about 2-3 weeks after the election after all the marches did not work.

The Russian accusation came before the election. https://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/10/08/us/politics/us-formally-accuses-russia-of-stealing-dnc
The marches were well more than 2 to 3 weeks after the election. Is there a reason your timeline is so messed up?

YesYNot says

Entitlemented says

Well said. The entire "Trump had russia help" started about 2-3 weeks after the election after all the marches did not work.

The Russian accusation came before the election. https://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/10/08/us/politics/us-formally-accuses-russia-of-stealing-dnc

The marches were well more than 2 to 3 weeks after the election. Is there a reason your timeline is so messed up?

That link is broken. Some of the pieces were there... such as the Trump tower server, wikileaks came from russia, etc... all w/o any actual facts to support the assumptions. Suggesting that this was an election "hack" was a narrative pushed after the election. If you recall before the election Obama's story was "At the end of the day it's the American people's decision." "Of course the election wont be hacked. What does that even mean?" -august 2016, over a month after his administration applied and was denied for a FISA warrant. He knew everything then everything we know know about the russia story. They weren't "hacking our elections" until that became the convenient narrative.

Its all lies.

www.youtube.com/embed/sWLn3CZyP2A

President Obama says Donald Trumps claim that US elections will be rigged is ridiculous'. President Barack Obama has a suggestion for Donald Trump and his claims that the election will be rigged: "Go out there and win the election." Obama said Trump's recent suggestions that this fall's election won't be completely fair are "ridiculous." He added, "Of course the election will not be rigged. What does that even mean?" President Obama on Thursday laughed off Donald Trumps claim that the November election could be rigged" against him. Obama appeared befuddled by Trumps claim when asked about it during a press...

Obama doesn't give a rat's ass. He got his 60 million dollar paycheck from all the cum on his face aka "book deal", and he's checking out.

Really, who is going to buy Obama's shitty ghost written vanilla screed and actually read it. They may as well just publish random words.

CBOEtrader says

Heads will roll in the Obama administration

The obama administration ended when trump took the oath of office. No one let you know?

Just for giggles CBOE might want to read a fake news comie pinko reality based interpretation.

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/03/why-trump-is-accusing-obama-of-wiretapping/518793/

Ironman says

bob2356 says

CBOEtrader says

Heads will roll in the Obama administration

The obama administration ended when trump took the oath of office. No one let you know?

So Bobby, does that mean no one can be convicted of a crime they committed last year when Obama was President?

Plain english, It means just what it says. There is no obama administration, there are only former officials of the obama administration.

Ceffer says

Really, who is going to buy Obama's shitty ghost written vanilla screed and actually read it. They may as well just publish random words.

Various think tanks groups set up by Citigroup and Saudi Arabia.

"We'll take 100,000 for distribution."

Obama can't wait to be the Black Tony Blair and pocket the millions.