patrick.net

Dan8267 says

And the United States could definitely deteriorate into a theocracy.

It can't. Very few Christians are fanatical. Most lawmakers, even though they call themselves Christians, are really secular.

Strategist says

Dan8267 says

And the United States could definitely deteriorate into a theocracy.

It can't.

That's what they said about Trump being elected.

Strategist says

Very few Christians are fanatical.

That has changed in the past. It can change again. It takes constant opposition of religion to keep it in check.

Strategist says

Most lawmakers, even though they call themselves Christians, are really secular.

There are key senators in charge of important committees who cite Noah's Ark as evidence that rising sea-levels are impossible. That should scare you.

Dan8267 says

Quite well. If the communists were Christians, the world would have ended in nuclear war already.

Ha ha! The ideology responsible for the murder of more human beings on the planet did "quite well" according to Dan.

Dan8267 says

In any case, all the evil in the Soviet Union had nothing to do with atheism,

Has everything to do with atheism. It was a central tenet of Marxism/Leninism. You couldn't be a member of the Communist party and be a practicing Christian or Jew.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marxist%E2%80%93Leninist_atheism

socal2 says

Whereas, the super sophisticated atheists types used "science" to justify slavery and eugenics. Isn't slavery and racism our country's biggest sin?

Slavery was supported by Christianity. The Bible even tells you how slaves should be treated, and what the price of a slave should be.
The Bible was used to justify American slavery.
If it wasn't for science, atheism and secularism we would still be living in a rotten world with slaves.

socal2 says

Every fanatic I encounter on internet forums like this are "AA's" (angry atheists).

And this would be an example of a poisoning the well argument. It goes like this.

Step 1, claim that atheists are all angry people. This, of course, is completely untrue, but socal2 expects the audience are idiots who can be fooled. Step 2, since you've demonized the target group, claim that therefore anything they say must be untrue. After all angry people can never be right about anything. Case in point, all those Jews who are angry about the Holocaust cannot be right, therefore the Holocaust must have never happened. It's just logic, man.

Atheists are not angry. A lot of Christians are pissed the fuck off because atheists are now winning the popular opinion about religion by exposing how ridiculous it is. Of course, being angry doesn't make Christians wrong about their god. Reality makes them wrong about their god.

When one side uses nothing but lies and logical fallacies, it's a red flag.

Dan8267 says

Atheists are not angry. A lot of Christians are pissed the fuck off because atheists are now winning the popular opinion about religion by exposing how ridiculous it is. Of course, being angry doesn't make Christians wrong about their god. Reality makes them wrong about their god.

Ha ha ha. Quite right.
Even if atheists are angry, so what? They are the victims. They are hated, discriminated, and cursed just because they don't believe the silly nonsense in the fairy tale Bible.

Strategist says

Slavery was supported by Christianity.

Slavery was supported and practiced by virtually every society and ideology on the planet at the time of Christ and the Old Testament. Slavery was around thousands of years before the first Jew walked the earth and the most scientifically brilliant societies of the ancient Greeks and Romans practiced slavery and worse.

Unlike Islam, Christianity and Judaism has evolved as humans gain more understanding of the universe. A central tenet of Catholicism is science and man's reason.

My point stands that the American Abolitionist movement which was at the forefront of eliminating slavery in America was a profoundly Christian movement.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_Abolitionism

My point also stands that the political, economic and social ideology responsible for more human deaths than anyone else in modern times was an explicitly atheist movement.

I am all for the separation of Church and State. There is no more awesome power in this world than that of organized governments who control our military, security services, and ability to tax. I think it is healthy for governments to have some competing outside moral ideologies to contend with. The atheist Communists and ISIS are very similar in how they fanatically eliminate any competing moral ideology.

Strategist says

Even if atheists are angry, so what? They are the victims.

We certainly would have the right to be angry. Anger is an appropriate emotional response to crimes against humanity like genocide, torture, rape, infanticide, burning people at the stake, etc.

However, the typical "angry" or "militant" atheist is summed up in this cartoon.

Quite frankly, most of us are more likely to get into a heated discussion about which captain is better, Kirk or Picard, than one about gods. By the way, Picard is clearly the better captain. Kirk is basically Trump, a pussy-grabbing hot head. Picard is a diplomat and thinker, and has inspirational speeches.

socal2 says

But I still recognize the massive benefits Christianity and Judaism provided Western Civilization.

Like the dark ages? The inquisition? The thirty years war? The albigensian crusade (kill them all , god will know his own)? The crusades? Hypatia and the library at alexandria?

Dan8267 says

And this would be an example of a poisoning the well argument. It goes like this.

Step 1, claim that atheists are all angry people. This, of course, is completely untrue, but socal2 expects the audience are idiots who can be fooled. Step 2, since you've demonized the target group, claim that therefore anything they say must be untrue. After all angry people can never be right about anything.

And this would be an example of Dan's staggering hypocrisy.

Because Dan saying something like this below ain't poisoning the well or anything. No demonization or untruths going on there - right Dan?

Dan8267 says

Christianity does more harm to America every day than Islam ever could. It corrupts our government, our laws, our policies, endangers the entire world ecosystem, and violates civil and human rights, all while holding morality back to Iron Age standards.

socal2 says

And this would be an example of Dan's staggering hypocrisy.

www.youtube.com/embed/G2y8Sx4B2Sk

A hypocrisy requires a contradiction in behavior and principle. There is none on my side.

socal2 says

No demonization or untruths going on there - right Dan?

Dan8267 says

Christianity does more harm to America every day than Islam ever could. It corrupts our government, our laws, our policies, endangers the entire world ecosystem, and violates civil and human rights, all while holding morality back to Iron Age standards.

No, there isn't any demonization or untruths in the above quote. One cannot state the facts of the Holocaust without making the Nazis look bad. That doesn't make those facts untrue or biased. Similarly, one cannot state the facts of Christian history without Christianity looking bad.

Historical truths make people on the wrong side of history look bad. You don't get to rewrite or whitewash history because your religion's evil deeds are well known. Stating historical facts is not poisoning the well. Historical truth matters.

www.youtube.com/embed/xefh7W1nVo4?start=189

bob2356 says

Like the dark ages? The inquisition? The thirty years war? The albigensian crusade (kill them all , god will know his own)? The crusades? Hypatia and the library at alexandria?

What are the most advanced, tolerant and prosperous nations on earth today Bob? Dare I say it is Christian dominated nations in the West? Is it a coincidence that Christian dominated nations are also the most secular, pluralistic and allow for diversity of faith or lack there of?

And for the record, Stalin killed more in one year than all of the inquisitions combined.

Crusades? Pushing back Islam's invasion of Europe and the Middle East is still considered a black mark against Christianity? Are the Crusades less pure than the Allies defeat of the Axis powers because the Allies fire-bombed and nuked cities killing hundreds of thousands of innocent people?

Dan8267 says

You don't get to rewrite or whitewash history because your religion's evil deeds are well known. Stating historical facts is not poisoning the well. Historical truth matters.

Says the dude that is trying to whitewash atheism's massive involvement in the most destructive ideology every to be inflicted upon our planet.

As you say, historical truth matters. The Commies are really good at revising history.

socal2 says

Strategist says

Slavery was supported by Christianity.

Slavery was supported and practiced by virtually every society and ideology on the planet at the time of Christ and the Old Testament. Slavery was around thousands of years before the first Jew walked the earth and the most scientifically brilliant societies of the ancient Greeks and Romans practiced slavery and worse.

It's irrelevant. Just because it was a common practice back then, does not make it moral. If the Bible allowed slavery, then the Bible is a piece of trash that belongs in the recycle bin.

socal2 says

Unlike Islam, Christianity and Judaism has evolved as humans gain more understanding of the universe. A central tenet of Catholicism is science and man's reason.

Religions don't evolve, the interpretations of religions evolve, due to education and science. The central tenet of Catholicism cannot be science, because science considers religions as silly mythology.

socal2 says

My point also stands that the political, economic and social ideology responsible for more human deaths than anyone else in modern times was an explicitly atheist movement.

Not it isn't. Almost all wars were a result of religion. Atheism is just a lack of belief.
The great majority of scientists are Atheists. Atheists are more intelligent, more educated and are the cause of scientific progress. Religions, which don't even believe in evolution are not capable of advancing the human race. Religions can only keep mankind in the era in which it was created.

socal2 says

My point stands that the American Abolitionist movement which was at the forefront of eliminating slavery in America was a profoundly Christian movement.

This IS True.

The first person in the world to get a government to ban slavery on Moral Grounds was William Wilburforce.

Naturally most SJWs have never heard of him, because he's not good for their narrative.

Toussaint of Haiti led a slave rebellion, only to end up re-legalizing it so he could have Slaves himself.

Nelson Mandela's wife kept Slaves, also.

socal2 says

Says the dude that is trying to whitewash

Honeybuns, I've whitewashed nothing. I called out your bullshit that Communism is an atheistic movement. It's not. The economic system does not have anything to do with religion, and just because the Soviet Union eliminated competition from it doesn't mean all Communist societies are atheistic or that the two things have anything to do with each other. Just look at Cuba.

You are trying to equate mustaches with mass murder and you just look stupid trying to do that. But hey, keep doing it. I love pointing out the dishonesty. It just kills your credibility.

socal2 says

What are the most advanced, tolerant and prosperous nations on earth today Bob? Dare I say it is Christian dominated nations in the West? Is it a coincidence that Christian dominated nations are also the most secular, pluralistic and allow for diversity of faith or lack there of?

What were the most advanced nations on earth 2000 years ago when Christianity was founded? Why did the advances in science and civilization decline badly right in step with the rise of Christianity? Why did progress begin again with the decline of the churches power and the rise in governments power. The most advanced, tolerant, and prosperous nations on earth got that way in spite of Christianity, not because of it.

Dan8267 says

They believe(d) in the divinity and resurrection of Christ. By definition, that makes them Christians.

Where are your witnesses? Surely there must be witnesses that say Vlad the Impaler confessed Jesus as his Lord and Savior? Where are these people who witnessed these men confessing Christ? I'm sure a true Christian would have a lot to say about how much Christ meant to them. They probably would talk about Jesus every day and want to share it with others.

Still waiting to hear from your witnesses.

Till then you are lying about their conversion.

Dan8267 says

PeopleUnited says

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/joseph-jakubowski-search-accused-of-stealing-guns-sending-manifesto-to-trump/

One of Dan's fellow anti-God warriors.

OK, you have one evil anti-religious person. How long did it take you to find that,

Um, honey it happened like Monday. It was national news.

Dan you have lost your sanity man.

God has a strange way of rewarding the people who embraced his religion, by setting famine, plague (during Justinian's reign), and barbarian invasions upon them mere decades after conversion. I think Rome fell less than a century after the official conversion of the Empire.

PeopleUnited says

Um, honey it happened like Monday. It was national news.

It's still the extremely rare exception to the rule, unlike 80% of Christian history.

FortWayne says

Dan you have lost your sanity man.

Feel free to back that up. I don't take crazy accusations from crazy seriously.

socal2 says

Crusades? Pushing back Islam's invasion of Europe and the Middle East is still considered a black mark against Christianity? Are the Crusades less pure than the Allies defeat of the Axis powers because the Allies fire-bombed and nuked cities killing hundreds of thousands of innocent people?

Try again. Islam didn't invade europe setting off the crusades. They never even made Constantinople. The closest the muslims came was Battle of Manzikert in 1071. After the surrender of Jerusalem on 637 muslims had control of the holy lands for 450 years before the crusades started. Alfonso VI of Castile, Sancho the Great, and Ramiro I of Aragon, were doing a nice job of driving the Moorish muslims out of the Iberian peninsula well before the crusades started.

The crusades were to regain the holy lands after the Seljuk prohibited pilgrimages to the holy land. Secondarily it gave Urban II an outlet to divert most of europes fighting men to something other than the rapidly spiralling out of control wars across the continent. The crusaders frequently managed to cause more trouble in the lands they passed through, especially Christian Constantinople, than in the holy land.

There was nothing pure about the crusades. Plunder was a bigger draw than religion for most crusaders.

bob2356 says

Try again. Islam didn't invade europe setting off the crusades. They never even made Constantinople. The closest the muslims came was Battle of Manzikert in 1071. After the surrender of Jerusalem on 637 muslims had control of the holy lands for 450 years before the crusades started. Alfonso VI of Castile, Sancho the Great, and Ramiro I of Aragon, were doing a nice job of driving the Moorish muslims out of the Iberian peninsula well before the crusades started.

Dude, the Arab Muslims besieged Constantinople THREE times, right at the dawn of Islam in the 600s and 700s. Repulsed mostly thanks to Greek Fire.

Constantinople eventually fell to the Turks in the 1400s, and by then the Turks held parts of Europe proper. The was just after a previous Jihad failed to be beaten back by Hungary.

Southeast Europe, including Greece, Bulgaria, Romania, what was Yugoslavia, parts of Hungary and even Austria were besieged by the Turks. Jesus, the Colonialist Imperialist Muslim Turks ruled a huge chunk of Europe right up until the time of the American Civil War, a mere century and a half ago.

They besieged Vienna, the heart of Europe FFS, in the 1500s and again in the 1600s. And the battle of Lepanto and the Siege of Malta, in the heart of the Med.

Islam did not spread from Mecca and Medina as far as Spain, Bengal, the North Shore of the Black and Caspian Seas, by handing out of Tracts and Evangelist Oratory, but by blood and iron. They filled a vacuum left by a bloody, ruinous conflict between Byantium and Persia, and all but exterminated the Zoroastrian religion. Only a few remnants survived by fleeing to India and Mozambique, the Indian exiles are known as the Parsi

Imperialist Colonialist Muslim Turks still control Constantinople, and have defaced the Hagia Sophia with their Islamic scribbles. Just like they converted or built deliberately on top of the Temple Mount in JEWrusalem, imposed the Babri Mosque over the Birthplace of Lord Rama in Ayodhya, and many, many places of worship from Hungary to the Menara Kundus in Indonesia.

Edit: I just remembered the Buddhas of Bamyian.

Jihads regularly took place on the Byzantine and Arab Frontiers, seasonally every year.

"Grand Strategy of the Byzantine Empire" by Edward Luttwak has a whole chapter on how the Byzantines would use a mix of bribery and small scale counter-raids by elite horsemen to counter the endless seasonal Jihads, where Arabs (later Turks also) from all over the MENA would gather to raid and plunder and terrorize Christian lands.

I think Victor Davis Hansen has a good bit on the Battle of Lepanto in one of his books, the one that deals with several Critical Battles. I think maybe Martel's turning of the Jihad from Spain near Tours is in there, also.

Roger Crowley has a great book on the siege of Malta.

Then there's John Julius Norwich who has a mega-tome on the history of Byzantium and his modern successor, Lars Brownworthy, has a great podcast series:
https://12byzantinerulers.com/

Europe came damn close to being overrun by Imperialist Colonialist Arab-Muslim Supremacists multiple times. God knows how many Slavs, taken in such numbers that most historians believe they gave their racial name to "Slaves", were enslaved. Ivan the Terrible burned the huge River Port of Astrakhan, a major gathering point for slaves taken by Muslim Tartars for shipment to the Middle East.

The Muslims were the greatest Slave Traders of all time, lasting almost 1400 years and still going on under terms like "Guest Worker" today in places like Qatar and Kuwait.

Even in the 18th Century, Arab Slavers raided as far as Ireland. In the 19th Century, after the Napoleonic Wars, British Industrialists were still leaving money in their wills to liberate White Christian slaves in North Africa.

Anybody who argues that the Muslims weren't expansionist, slaving, and almost entirely by the Sword is ignorant of history.

Some viewers may find Disturbing...
www.youtube.com/embed/-cTgk4oqEQw

An Ethiopian maid who survived a fall from the seventh floor of a building in Kuwait’s Sabah el-Salem area while her employer filmed has explained that she wasn’t trying to commit suicide.

“I wasn’t trying to commit suicide, I was trying to escape from the woman who tried to kill me,” the unnamed maid said in a video posted by Ethiopian media this weekend from the hospital where her broken arm is being treated.

Her "employer" (ahem) did not help but rather laughed and called her crazy as she begged for help.

She survived, but she wasn't trying to kill herself, but escape her brutal Kuwaiti Slave Mistress.

Origins of Slav:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/africa/features/storyofafrica/9chapter1.shtml

There may have been barbarism by Europeans in the past, but today it belongs to the followers of the Most High One.

During and leading up to the 2022 World Cup, expect Cuckmedia, ignorant of history and of offending "Oppressed Brown People", to say little of how the infrastructure was built by Slaves, who have their passports taken away, live in desert tents, are beaten regularly, have their water taken away, die in huge numbers, and often billed for their 'upkeep' so they end up with no or little pay at the end. They often end up begging for work, unable to buy a plane ticket home despite a year or more of employment for their "Employer"

PeopleUnited says

I suggest that you consult God's book of promises for you will find them to be faithful and true.

Oh, we're quoting the Bible now. OK.

Infanticide
"Happy is the one who seizes your infants and dashes them against the rocks." - Psalms 137:9

Rape and sex slavery after murder rampages of men and children and non-virgin girls.
"Now therefore, kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman who has known man intimately. But all the girls who have not known man intimately, spare for yourselves." Numbers 31:17-18

Slavery
"You may purchase male or female slaves from among the foreigners who live among you. You may also purchase the children of such resident foreigners, including those who have been born in your land. You may treat them as your property, passing them on to your children as a permanent inheritance. You may treat your slaves like this, but the people of Israel, your relatives, must never be treated this way." Leviticus 25:44-46 NLT

Sorry Lance Armstrong
"No one whose testicles are crushed or whose penis is cut off shall be admitted to the assembly of the LORD." Deuteronomy 23:1

Those are from the Old Testament, but the New Testament absolutely supports all those things and the unerringness of the Old Testament.

"Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. I tell you the truth, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished. Anyone who breaks one of the least of these commandments and teaches others to do the same will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever practices and teaches these commands will be called great in the kingdom of heaven." Matthew 5:17-19

"But it is easier for heaven and earth to disappear than for one dot of the Law to become void." Luke 16:17

"All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness," Timothy 3:16

And remember, the Christians opted in for including the Old Testament as half of the Bibile.

But wait, there's more. The New Testament is also morally bankrupt. Sprinkling in a few "be nice to your neighbor" doesn't mitigate this any more than doing that in the Old Testament did.

Those who bear bad fruit will be cut down and burned "with unquenchable fire." Matthew 3:10, 12

Jesus recommends that to avoid sin we cut off our hands and pluck out our eyes. This advice is given immediately after he says that anyone who looks with lust at any women commits adultery. Matthew 5:29-30

Jesus says that most people will go to hell. Matthew 7:13-14

Jesus sends some devils into a herd of pigs, causing them to run off a cliff and drown in the waters below. Matthew 8:32

Families will be torn apart because of Jesus. "Brother shall deliver up the brother to death, and the father the child: and the children shall rise up against their parents, and cause them to be put to death." Matthew 8:32 10:21

Jesus says that he has come to destroy families by making family members hate each other. He has "come not to send peace, but a sword." Matthew 10:34-36

Jesus condemns entire cities to dreadful deaths and to the eternal torment of hell because they didn't care for his preaching. Matthew 11:20-24

Jesus will send his angels to gather up "all that offend" and they "shall cast them into a furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth." Matthew 13:41-42, 50

Jesus is criticized by the Pharisees for not washing his hands before eating. He defends himself by attacking them for not killing disobedient children according to the commandment: "He that curseth father or mother, let him die the death." Matthew 15:4-7

In the parable of the unforgiving servant, the king threatens to enslave a man and his entire family to pay for a debt. This practice, which was common at the time, seems not to have bothered Jesus very much. The parable ends with this: "So likewise shall my heavenly Father do also unto you." If you are cruel to others, God will be cruel to you. Matthew 18:23-35

God is like a rich man who owns a vineyard and rents it to poor farmers. When he sends servants to collect the rent, the tenants beat or kill them. So he sent his son to collect the rent, and they kill him too. Then the owner comes and kills the farmers and rents the vineyard to others. Matthew 21:33-41

Jesus believed the story of Noah's ark. He thought it really happened and had no problem with the idea of God drowning everything and everybody. Matthew 17:26-27

Those who do not believe in Jesus will be cast into a fire to be burned. This also proves that PeopleUnited is full of shit when he says the defining characteristic of Christianity isn't faith in Jesus's divinity and resurrection. Matthew 15:6

And Christ, that's just part of the Gospel according to Matthew. There are three other gospels to go through as well as many other books. Not even I have the patience to list all the evil things in the New Testament, so just a few more for now.

Peter claims that Dt 18:18-19 refers to Jesus, saying that those who refuse to follow him (all non-Christians) must be killed. Acts 3:23

Peter and God scare Ananias and his wife to death for not forking over all of the money that they made when selling their land. Acts 5:1-10

Homosexuals (those "without natural affection") and their supporters (those "that have pleasure in them") are "worthy of death" - - along with gossips, boasters, and disobedient children. Romans 1:31-32

The guilty are "justified" and "saved from wrath" by the blood of an innocent victim. Romans 5:9

God punishes everyone for someone else's sin; then he saves them by killing an innocent victim. Romans 5:12

James says Abraham was justified by works (for being willing to kill his son for God); Paul (Romans 4:2-3) says he was justified by faith (for believing that God would order him to do such an evil act). James 2:21

God will set the entire earth on fire so that he can burn non-believers to death. Peter 3:7

The New Testament is evil, too.

Lashkar_i_Trumpi says

Her "employer" (ahem) did not help but rather laughed and called her crazy as she begged for help.

She survived, but she wasn't trying to kill herself, but escape her brutal Kuwaiti Slave Mistress.

Fucking Kuwaiti bitch.

Even Patrick isn't willing to defend Christianity in this thread, and he's usually apt to do so. The evidence is that overwhelming.

Slavery is still normal in Kuwait.

http://financialjuneteenth.com/african-women-sold-into-slavery-in-kuwait-as-domestic-workers/

Good thing we liberated Kuwait from Saddam, right? He might have ended slavery there. Under US protection, the Kuwaitis get to keep their slaves.

Dan8267 says

It's funny how the biggest liars accuse honest people of lying.

Its funny how the biggest liars are the ones who make statements like Vlad the Impaler is a Christian and back it up with absolutely no evidence. We are still waiting to hear about how Vlad became a new creature in Christ, repenting of his murderous ways.

rando says

Slavery is still normal in Kuwait.

http://financialjuneteenth.com/african-women-sold-into-slavery-in-kuwait-as-domestic-workers/

Its Jesus fault (according to lying Dan's "logic")

rando says

Good thing we liberated Kuwait from Saddam, right? He might have ended slavery there. Under US protection, the Kuwaitis get to keep their slaves.

@Patrick

Good point, Saddam was a murderous prick but at least he kept a clean house. We didn't go to Iraq as liberators, that is for sure. It was the wrong thing to do for America, and for the world. A shameful part of American history.

https://culturalglimpse.com/2015/01/30/saddam-vs-king-of-saudi-arabia/

Dan8267 says

To say that Christianity has nothing to do with the evil actions of Christians from burning homosexuals to death, to committing assaults on them, to suppressing their basic civil rights is completely disingenuous.

To contribute evil actions such as burning homosexuals, assults on them etc... to Jesus is dishonest and shameful. When did Jesus tell His people to do such violence? Never. Not once. It is just more lies.

You can't attribute a bad act to teacher who told people to do the exact opposite. Unless you are a lying sack of shit.

Dan8267 says

90% of all self-identifying, church-going Christians weren't really Christians

I did not say that you did. But I agree with the premise based on the preponderance of evidence. Only around 10% of people who claim to be Christians live a life that reflects Jesus in them. Only around one in ten "christians" I know is even interested in talking about Jesus outside of church.

You got that right Dan! Be careful you are starting to make sense.

PeopleUnited says

Its funny how the biggest liars are the ones who make statements like Vlad the Impaler is a Christian and back it up with absolutely no evidence

OMFG, you must be kidding me! Are you seriously that ignorant of history? Vlad the Implaler was an Eastern Orthodox Christian who later converted to Catholicism under duress. Furthermore, his atrocities were committed for the express purpose of defending Christianity and the Church from those god damn Muslims.

https://orthodoxwiki.org/Vlad_the_Impaler

Vlad III, Prince of Wallachia, became a Romanian national hero for his defense of the Orthodox Christian faith against the Turk.

www.youtube.com/embed/FAvuzTQciew

He was celebrated throughout Christendom for his achievements against the Turks.

Way to completely rewrite history, PeopleUnited. Once more you are caught lying about historical fact, and quite frankly, that's just plain stupid because historical fact is the easiest damn thing to verify what with history being literally a written record of the past.

Hey - Dan is now quoting Russia's propaganda arm "Global Research" to criticize Christians!

You can't take the Commie out of the Atheists!

socal2 says

Hey - Dan is now quoting Russia's propaganda arm "Global Research" to criticize Christians!

1. If you think anything cited from there is inaccurate, grow a pair of balls and challenge it.
2. I presented a multitude of evidence from different sources. If you want my argument to collapse, you must take out all its legs. Start with the NY Times article if you dare.
3. The hypocrisy of you calling anything propaganda is pungent. Same goes for anyone who quotes climate change denial propaganda.

socal2 says

You can't take the Commie out of the Atheists!

Tell that to Cuba, dumb ass. It's highly religious and communistic.

Really, how dumb do you have to be to think that the disbelief in gods has anything remotely to do with an economic system in which ownership and distribution is done by the state? Those two things have less in common with each other than cats and nuclear submarines.

socal2 says

Apparently every day Christianity is harming America. I guess all these Christian charities just need to go away because they are doing so much harm.

An example of deliberately flawed and dishonest logic. Some charities are ran in the name of Christianity. Therefore, Christianity must be good no matter what else it does and anyone who judges Christianity negatively must be against charity.

Here's a list of 1,271 Islamic charities. Now let's apply your logic.

Some charities are ran in the name of Islam. Therefore, Islam must be good no matter what else it does and anyone who judges Islam negatively must be against charity.

You fucking asshole. How can you be for shutting down charities that help starving children? Or are you now an advocate of Islam?

I'm beginning to wonder if hypocrisy is also an inescapable characteristic of faith.

Dan8267 says

I've never said that Islam is not a bigger threat to the world than Christianity.

You did say that Christianity is a bigger threat to America than Islam. It is practically verbatum what you said earlier in this thread.