patrick.net

This is total fake news. They can't possibly give a decent blow job wearing those bonnets.

Ceffer says

This is total fake news. They can't possibly give a decent blow job wearing those bonnets.

Remember, they are "hand maids." You only get a reach-around anyway.

HeadSet says

Remember, they are "hand maids." You only get a reach=around anyway.

Must be what the gloves are for.

Ceffer says

HeadSet says

Remember, they are "hand maids." You only get a reach=around anyway.

Must be what the gloves are for.

Maybe they are splash guards.

Ceffer says

They can't possibly give a decent blow job wearing those bonnets.

In my case, those bonnets are a depth gauge so they do not choke.

https://wmbriggs.substack.com/p/trends-in-wokeness-and-girlbossery

Trends In Wokeness & Girlbossery In Science

HeadSet says

In my case, those bonnets are a depth gauge so they do not choke.

I can't see how they can get a head in those. Maybe that's why they call it a blow job.

Patrick says

Trends In Wokeness & Girlbossery In Science

The Girlbossery Glossary. I prefer sensitivity draining to sensitivity training.

What, lady, what? Cooking a Rotiserrie Chicken? Climbing Mt. Surabachi? Having threesomes with a Albanian Albino Lesbian Midget?

They are Legion

https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/lgb-vs-tqiaxyz

i care about watching dudes in dresses beat living hell of of women in the olympics and crush them in volleyball and swimming and cycling and track and have to listen to these raging frauds go on TV and talk about how “it’s really not known if male puberty gives men an athletic advantage” and somehow pretend that the fact that most female world records in track having been beaten by 15 year old boys is somehow “caused by cultural gender roles.”

Booger says

Booger says

No means a negotiation and extortion failure, or the price wasn't right.

I only fantasize about a Lamborgini, I don't actually want one.



"Bullshit!"

"Oh yeah, go pick 5 random romance novels from the used bookstore. They're not called Bodice Rippers because nice Al the bald in accounting swings by with flowers for m'lady"

AmericanKulak says

I only fantasize about a Lamborgini, I don't actually want one.

Yes, but does it want you.

Not to put too fine a point on it, feminism is fatal to humanity. Especially coupled with easily available birth control.

Either women accept that their most important role is to be good mothers, or we all die out.

I think female resentment of men is actually innate and inevitable, so everyone should stop catering to that resentment. It does not matter what men do. A large fraction of women will resent men anyway.

A real man inspires feminist resentment for being stronger and more aggressive than women are, and more successful because of those strengths. That is the true origin of the so-called "pay gap".

A weak man inspires contempt and loathing in women.

Might as well be a real man.

https://notthebee.com/article/heres-all-we-know-about-the-madison-christian-school-shooter

"Every single male must be wiped out": Here's all we know about the Madison Christian school shooter

We've got more information on the 15-year-old Abundant Life shooter, and it looks like she was a mass-shooting fanatic with violent feminist beliefs.

Journalist Andy Ngo has the scoop:




... Because it is important for us to understand the ideology driving these shootings, and because the government moves quickly to hush up killings done in the name of leftist ideology (see the 2023 Covenant School shooting in Nashville), we want you to see part of that manifesto.

When we say this stuff is a mind virus, we mean it. It's literally killing people.

I've heard this before. Can't decide whether I believe it's true, but might be.

Also disturbing: the majority of gay men seem to be dog owners.

Patrick says

I've heard this before. Can't decide whether I believe it's true, but might be.

I think 1 in 300 is a possibility. I think many exaggerate this.

I prefer not to dwell on such a disturbing subject.

Schoepenhauer, "On Women"
https://onemorelibrary.com/index.php/en/?option=com_djclassifieds&format=raw&view=download&task=download&fid=14411

The intuitive, emotionally intelligent sex, everybody:

AmericanKulak says

Schoepenhauer, "On Women"
https://onemorelibrary.com/index.php/en/?option=com_djclassifieds&format=raw&view=download&task=download&fid=14411

https://thevirtuallibrary.org/
On Women
Arthur Schopenhauer
Translated by Rudolf Dircks
From Book “Essays of Schopenhauer”, Walter Scott, London, 1890
On Women.
These few words of Jouy, Sans les femmes le commencement de notre vie seroit privé de
secours, le milieu de plaisirs et la fin de consolation, more exactly express, in my opinion,
the true praise of woman than Schiller’s poem, Würde der Frauen, which is the fruit of
much careful thought and impressive because of its antithesis and use of contrast. The
same thing is more pathetically expressed by Byron in Sardanapalus, Act i, Sc. 2:—
“The very first
Of human life must spring from woman’s breast,
Your first small words are taught you from her lips,
Your first tears quench’d by her, and your last sighs
Too often breathed out in a woman’s hearing,
When men have shrunk from the ignoble care
Of watching the last hour of him who led them.”
Both passages show the right point of view for the appreciation of women.
One need only look at a woman’s shape to discover that she is not intended for either too
much mental or too much physical work. She pays the debt of life not by what she does
but by what she suffers — by the pains of child-bearing, care for the child, and by
subjection to man, to whom she should be a patient and cheerful companion. The greatest
sorrows and joys or great exhibition of strength are not assigned to her; her life should
flow more quietly, more gently, and less obtrusively than man’s, without her being
essentially happier or unhappier.
Women are directly adapted to act as the nurses and educators of our early childhood, for
the simple reason that they themselves are childish, foolish, and short-sighted — in a
word, are big children all their lives, something intermediate between the child and the
man, who is a man in the strict sense of the word. Consider how a young girl will toy day
after day with a child, dance with it and sing to it; and then consider what a man, with the
very best intentions in the world, could do in her place.
With girls, Nature has had in view what is called in a dramatic sense a “striking effect,”
for she endows them for a few years with a richness of beauty and a, fulness of charm at
the expense of the rest of their lives; so that they may during these years ensnare the
fantasy of a man to such a degree as to make him rush into taking the honourable care of
them, in some kind of form, for a lifetime — a step which would not seem sufficiently
justified if he only considered the matter. Accordingly, Nature has furnished woman, as
she has the rest of her creatures, with the weapons and implements necessary for the
protection of her existence and for just the length of time that they will be of service to
her; so that Nature has proceeded here with her usual economy. Just as the female ant after
coition loses her wings, which then become superfluous, nay, dangerous for breeding
purposes, so for the most part does a woman lose her beauty after giving birth to one or
two children; and probably for the same reasons.
Then again we find that young girls in their hearts regard their domestic or other affairs as
secondary things, if not as a mere jest. Love, conquests, and all that these include, such as
dressing, dancing, and so on, they give their serious attention.
The nobler and more perfect a thing is, the later and slower is it in reaching maturity. Man
reaches the maturity of his reasoning and mental faculties scarcely before he is eight-andtwenty;
woman when she is eighteen; but hers is reason of very narrow limitations. This is
why women remain children all their lives, for they always see only what is near at hand,
cling to the present, take the appearance of a thing for reality, and prefer trifling matters to
the most important. It is by virtue of man’s reasoning powers that he does not live in the
present only, like the brute, but observes and ponders over the past and future; and from
this spring discretion, care, and that anxiety which we so frequently notice in people. The
advantages, as well as the disadvantages, that this entails, make woman, in consequence of
her weaker reasoning powers, less of a partaker in them. Moreover, she is intellectually
short-sighted, for although her intuitive understanding quickly perceives what is near to
her, on the other hand her circle of vision is limited and does not embrace anything that is
remote; hence everything that is absent or past, or in the future, affects women in a less
degree than men. This is why they have greater inclination for extravagance, which
sometimes borders on madness. Women in their hearts think that men are intended to earn
money so that they may spend it, if possible during their husband’s lifetime, but at any rate
after his death.
As soon as he has given them his earnings on which to keep house they are strengthened
in this belief. Although all this entails many disadvantages, yet it has this advantage —
that a woman lives more in the present than a man, and that she enjoys it more keenly if it
is at all bearable. This is the origin of that cheerfulness which is peculiar to woman and
makes her fit to divert man, and in case of need, to console him when he is weighed down
by cares. To consult women in matters of difficulty, as the Germans used to do in old
times, is by no means a matter to be overlooked; for their way of grasping a thing is quite
different from ours, chiefly because they like the shortest way to the point, and usually
keep their attention fixed upon what lies nearest; while we, as a rule, see beyond it, for the
simple reason that it lies under our nose; it then becomes necessary for us to be brought
back to the thing in order to obtain a near and simple view. This is why women are more
sober in their judgment than we, and why they see nothing more in things than is really
there; while we, if our passions are roused, slightly exaggerate or add to our imagination.
It is because women’s reasoning powers are weaker that they show more sympathy for the
unfortunate than men, and consequently take a kindlier interest in them. On the other
hand, women are inferior to men in matters of justice, honesty, and conscientiousness.
Again, because their reasoning faculty is weak, things clearly visible and real, and
belonging to the present, exercise a power over them which is rarely counteracted by
abstract thoughts, fixed maxims, or firm resolutions, in general, by regard for the past and
future or by consideration for what is absent and remote. Accordingly they have the first
and principal qualities of virtue, but they lack the secondary qualities which are often a
necessary instrument in developing it. Women may be compared in this respect to an
organism that has a liver but no gall-bladder.(1) So that it will be found that the
fundamental fault in the character of women is that they have no “sense of justice.” This
arises from their deficiency in the power of reasoning already referred to, and reflection,
but is also partly due to the fact that Nature has not destined them, as the weaker sex, to be
dependent on strength but on cunning; this is why they are instinctively crafty, and have
an ineradicable tendency to lie. For as lions are furnished with claws and teeth, elephants
with tusks, boars with fangs, bulls with horns, and the cuttlefish with its dark, inky fluid,
so Nature has provided woman for her protection and defence with the faculty of
dissimulation, and all the power which Nature has given to man in the form of bodily
strength and reason has been conferred on woman in this form. Hence, dissimulation is
innate in woman and almost as characteristic of the very stupid as of the clever.
Accordingly, it is as natural for women to dissemble at every opportunity as it is for those
animals to turn to their weapons when they are attacked; and they feel in doing so that in a
certain measure they are only making use of their rights. Therefore a woman who is
perfectly truthful and does not dissemble is perhaps an impossibility. This is why they see
through dissimulation in others so easily; therefore it is not advisable to attempt it with
them. From the fundamental defect that has been stated, and all that it involves, spring
falseness, faithlessness, treachery, ungratefulness, and so on. In a court of justice women
are more often found guilty of perjury than men. It is indeed to be generally questioned
whether they should be allowed to take an oath at all. From time to time there are repeated
cases everywhere of ladies, who want for nothing, secretly pocketing and taking away
things from shop counters.
Nature has made it the calling of the young, strong, and handsome men to look after the
propagation of the human race; so that the species may not degenerate. This is the firm
will of Nature, and it finds its expression in the passions of women. This law surpasses all
others in both age and power. Woe then to the man who sets up rights and interests in such
a way as to make them stand in the way of it; for whatever he may do or say, they will, at
the first significant onset, be unmercifully annihilated. For the secret, unformulated, nay,
unconscious but innate moral of woman is: We are justified in deceiving those who,
because they care a little for us — that is to say for the individual — imagine they have
obtained rights over the species. The constitution, and consequently the welfare of the
species, have been put into our hands and entrusted to our care through the medium of the
next generation which proceeds from us; let us fulfil our duties conscientiously.
But women are by no means conscious of this leading principle in abstracto, they are only
conscious of it in concreto, and have no other way of expressing it than in the manner in
which they act when the opportunity arrives. So that their conscience does not trouble
them so much as we imagine, for in the darkest depths of their hearts they are conscious
that in violating their duty towards the individual they have all the better fulfilled it
towards the species, whose claim upon them is infinitely greater. (A fuller explanation of
this matter may be found in vol. ii., ch. 44, in my chief work, Die Welt als Wille und
Vorstellung.)
Because women in truth exist entirely for the propagation of the race, and their destiny
ends here, they live more for the species than for the individual, and in their hearts take the
affairs of the species more seriously than those of the individual. This gives to their whole
being and character a certain frivolousness, and altogether a certain tendency which is
fundamentally different from that of man; and this it is which develops that discord in
married life which is so prevalent and almost the normal state.
It is natural for a feeling of mere indifference to exist between men, but between women it
is actual enmity. This is due perhaps to the fact that odium figulinum in the case of men, is
limited to their everyday affairs, but with women embraces the whole sex; since they have
only one kind of business. Even when they meet in the street, they look at each other like
Guelphs and Ghibellines. And it is quite evident when two women first make each other’s
acquaintance that they exhibit more constraint and dissimulation than two men placed in
similar circumstances. This is why an exchange of compliments between two women is
much more ridiculous than between two men. Further, while a man will, as a rule, address
others, even those inferior to himself, with a certain feeling of consideration and humanity,
it is unbearable to see how proudly and disdainfully a lady of rank will, for the most part,
behave towards one who is in a lower rank (not employed in her service) when she speaks
to her. This may be because differences of rank are much more precarious with women
than with us, and consequently more quickly change their line of conduct and elevate
them, or because while a hundred things must be weighed in our case, there is only one to
be weighed in theirs, namely, with which man they have found favour; and again, because
of the one-sided nature of their vocation they stand in closer relationship to each other
than men do; and so it is they try to render prominent the differences of rank.
It is only the man whose intellect is clouded by his sexual instinct that could give that
stunted, narrow-shouldered, broad-hipped, and short-legged race the name of the fair sex;
for the entire beauty of the sex is based on this instinct. One would be more justified in
calling them the unaesthetic sex than the beautiful. Neither for music, nor for poetry, nor
for fine art have they any real or true sense and susceptibility, and it is mere mockery on
their part, in their desire to please, if they affect any such thing.
This makes them incapable of taking a purely objective interest in anything, and the
reason for it is, I fancy, as follows. A man strives to get direct mastery over things either
by understanding them or by compulsion. But a woman is always and everywhere driven
to indirect mastery, namely through a man; all her direct mastery being limited to him
alone. Therefore it lies in woman’s nature to look upon everything only as a means for
winning man, and her interest in anything else is always a simulated one, a mere
roundabout way to gain her ends, consisting of coquetry and pretence. Hence Rousseau
said, Les femmes, en général, n’aiment aucun art, ne se connoissent à aucun et n’ont
aucun génie (Lettre à d’Alembert, note xx.). Every one who can see through a sham must
have found this to be the case. One need only watch the way they behave at a concert, the
opera, or the play; the childish simplicity, for instance, with which they keep on chattering
during the finest passages in the greatest masterpieces. If it is true that the Greeks forbade
women to go to the play, they acted in a right way; for they would at any rate be able to
hear something. In our day it would be more appropriate to substitute taceat mulier in
theatro for taceat mulier in ecclesia; and this might perhaps be put up in big letters on the
curtain.