patrick.net

Booger says

Translation: "They dumped me for another actress in Season 3 OR they cancelled the series entirely OR Bella & I are both in on this..."

Hell, that entire scene was a violation. I haven't seen such a scene since "Monster".

Musta been quite an orgasm if it 'shook' Hollywood. Takes a lot to shock Hollywood, much less shake it. It's the land of grabbed twats.
MolotovCocktail says

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/momsville-tuesday-september-2-2025

Early last month, Time Magazine quietly ran a sleeper story headlined, “Why So Many Women Are Quitting the Workforce.” As usual, it never actually answered the question, but rather was a massive bat-signal for the conservative counter-revolution at work, which is probably why you never heard anything else about it.

Get this: According to the most recent labor statistics (as of August 1st), -212,000 women between ages 20 and 44 have left the workforce. It’s clearly a gender-specific phenomenon. During the same period, +44,000 more men in that same age range entered.

Something is happening. ...

But the Washington Post went where Time refused to go. A week later, WaPo ran a much more thoughtful story about the same statistics, headlined, “Mothers are leaving the workforce, erasing pandemic gains.” Mothers. So … it’s not back-to-work, OnlyFans gigs, or ICE raids on nursery schools. It’s motherhood. That’s the “problem.”

It turns out that, if you pick apart the official labor data, the largest cohort of ladies fleeing traditional jobs were those with kids under 5. WaPo admitted that a lot of them are pretty happy about it, too:

In some cases, mothers say they are giving up jobs happily, in line with
MAGA culture and the rise of the "traditional wife" (#tradwife on social
media), which celebrates women choosing conventional gender roles by
focusing on children instead of careers. The Trump administration has
doubled down on its message that Americans should be having more
babies, with Vice President JD Vance promoting the benefits of having a
parent at home, saying "young children are clearly happier and
healthier" in such arrangements.

The same theme tracked straight through the story. “Work was a big, big part of my identity, but all of these little things added up,” said Isabelle Beulaygue, 37, who this year left her job as a university professor in Santa Fe, New Mexico, to stay home with her infant. Ellie Santoni, 39, said, “I was working so much, there were weeks when I saw my kids for maybe 30 minutes a day. Finally, it was like, ‘Let’s slow this down, so I can be a present mother.’”

Don’t misunderstand; both Time and WaPo unquestionably presented the trend as a deplorable setback for women’s rights. Instead of seeing the joyful fulfillment these mothers achieved, both pessimistic platforms saw only losses; lost income, lost opportunity, lost respect.

But what was possibly most impressive about this underreported story was how these women —happier working for their families instead of for their bosses— were quoted at all, and quoted unskeptically, at that. We have apparently achieved a new cultural milestone where motherhood is now finally re-recognized as a viable option for young women, and not necessarily always the lesser option.

Adore me, maybe I'll let you touch me. Adore me and you pay for a nice dinner and holiday, maybe I'll make out with you. Adore me and you're gorgeous and rich, maybe I'll let you fuck me. Adore me and you are rich and powerful, I will definitely suck your cock.

The image summarizes human history. Man kills other man and steals his woman, who falls in love with him. Women love the winner.

And if someone yes more powerful kills Conan and carries her away a second time, she will fall in love with that new guy too.

It's rational even if entirely selfish. It's about getting the best genes and best protection for her children.

Patrick says

You should totally mention that time Mohammed tortured Safiya's husband to death to find the location of his money, murdered her father, and then raped her the same day.

It was truly a hilarious episode.

https://covidsteria.substack.com/p/karensteria-best-phillies-karen-memes-baseball-karen

Men do everything, generally always have. Even a stay at home dad is better if they have the finances. The kids I see failing at school are the ones without men involved 100% of the time. Kids getting in trouble, etc. I've yet to meet a successful single mother unless they fell into money. Even then they ultimately need a man. Witness it with my wife's family. Hell I have another kid because of it. One SIL had her husband off himself.

A good woman is hard to find. I lucked out. I'm not pushing my kids to get girlfriends and that crap at this point. Even in a wholesome community where I live women destroy lives. One of the local bars we call them Pub Sluts. I don't walk or jog, I run from that fucking place. Also outside of CA and probably FL, women don't keep their bodies in shape.

I don't know about the indigenous realm. I just think it's a woman problem overall. I'm probably old school on this and don't care, but I don't think they should be able to vote. My 0.02¢

They need to sell one way mirror tickets to the beaver shlepping. Still, the economics will depend on men.
MolotovCocktail says

Ceffer says

They need to sell one way mirror tickets to the beaver shlepping. Still, the economics will depend on men.
MolotovCocktail says

Yep.

Women simply cannot hang out with each other. There's always a breach in the "friendship" with other women. Guys need to be present to calm the cattiness of women. Because it's not as violent, most women fights go unreported to authorities. Men are more violent when it gets to that stage. So men are made out to be animals.

Women are way worse. Could be violence or emotional, but women without a moral compass are dangerous.

WookieMan says

Women simply cannot hang out with each other. There's always a breach in the "friendship" with other women. Guys need to be present to calm the cattiness of women. Because it's not as violent, most women fights go unreported to authorities. Men are more violent when it gets to that stage. So men are made out to be animals.

Women are way worse. Could be violence or emotional, but women without a moral compass are dangerous.

Yeah. At least men go out back, beat each other up and then it's over, usually.(Not so ironically, it is when a women involved the exception holds.)

But women...their shit can go on for decades.

Well, that's not the relationship optimism I was looking for.

https://t.me/tribunalsandexecutions/527294

Maybe comes back once in a while for a 20 minute conjugal visit with the kid in a locked room somewhere. That's first class parenting.
Patrick says

Booger says

Yep. If you’re well enough off that you don’t need a wife to work and afford all the things she wants, better get a prenup. For everyone else tradition is necessarily dead imo

Glock-n-Load says

Booger says

Yep. If you’re well enough off that you don’t need a wife to work and afford all the things she wants, better get a prenup. For everyone else tradition is necessarily dead imo

Many men stay ambitous and reach their earnings zenith later in life while womyn often slow down and slob and which makes this difficult as assets acquired during the marriage are still split. You'd have to either specify dollar amounts and/or explicitly state everything excluded in case of divorce. And then they'll find a judge to toss it ;)

Patrick says

Let me guess... mom was on vacation

mell says

Yep. If you’re well enough off that you don’t need a wife to work and afford all the things she wants, better get a prenup. For everyone else tradition is necessarily dead imo

Prenup just means the lawyers will litigate the divorce AND the prenup until the marital estate winds up mostly in their fee bucket as usual usual. Prenup is just a contract, and endless battles over contracts are just as possible as endless battles over divorce.

I read something that lawyers consider themselves rightfully entitled to at least 40 percent of any estate if they become involved. They will keep the paper churning and the parties adversarial until they have achieved that goal.

It’s a crapshoot. Make your wife your best friend. If you don’t think you’re her best friend, take measures.

Ceffer says

mell says

Yep. If you’re well enough off that you don’t need a wife to work and afford all the things she wants, better get a prenup.
For everyone else tradition is necessarily dead imo

Prenup just means the lawyers will litigate the divorce AND the prenup until the marital estate winds up mostly in their fee bucket as usual usual. Prenup is just a contract, and endless battles over contracts are just as possible as endless battles over divorce.

I read something that lawyers consider themselves rightfully entitled to at least 40 percent of any estate if they become involved. They will keep the paper churning and the parties adversarial until they have achieved that goal.

There are very few people who pay very expensive lawyers to draw close to iron clad prenups, but they must be delivered well ahead of time of the marriage etc. Most prenups don't hold.

Glock-n-Load says

It’s a crapshoot. Make your wife your best friend. If you don’t think your her best friend, take measures.

Or find someone loyal and/or religious enough to stay through thick and thin even when you're not best friends. There is no doubt that with the advent of vaginamony and child suppport the natural solipsists became far less stable and reliable and cut their work in half or less ;)

You got the wrong "ism" it was Globalism and Communism.
Feminist couldn't get two cats to keep a clean litter box.

Kill communism and most "isms" will disappear. But don't ever diminish its impact by throwing around social constructs, it's how they hide in the shadows.

Booger says

No doubt

mell says

Booger says

No doubt

More properly, "Marriage is the main way for women to appropriate the financial resources of otherwise successful men."

Sheee-it!

The dude starts early on this one: