patrick.net

Men do everything, generally always have. Even a stay at home dad is better if they have the finances. The kids I see failing at school are the ones without men involved 100% of the time. Kids getting in trouble, etc. I've yet to meet a successful single mother unless they fell into money. Even then they ultimately need a man. Witness it with my wife's family. Hell I have another kid because of it. One SIL had her husband off himself.

A good woman is hard to find. I lucked out. I'm not pushing my kids to get girlfriends and that crap at this point. Even in a wholesome community where I live women destroy lives. One of the local bars we call them Pub Sluts. I don't walk or jog, I run from that fucking place. Also outside of CA and probably FL, women don't keep their bodies in shape.

I don't know about the indigenous realm. I just think it's a woman problem overall. I'm probably old school on this and don't care, but I don't think they should be able to vote. My 0.02¢

They need to sell one way mirror tickets to the beaver shlepping. Still, the economics will depend on men.
MolotovCocktail says

Ceffer says

They need to sell one way mirror tickets to the beaver shlepping. Still, the economics will depend on men.
MolotovCocktail says

Yep.

Women simply cannot hang out with each other. There's always a breach in the "friendship" with other women. Guys need to be present to calm the cattiness of women. Because it's not as violent, most women fights go unreported to authorities. Men are more violent when it gets to that stage. So men are made out to be animals.

Women are way worse. Could be violence or emotional, but women without a moral compass are dangerous.

WookieMan says

Women simply cannot hang out with each other. There's always a breach in the "friendship" with other women. Guys need to be present to calm the cattiness of women. Because it's not as violent, most women fights go unreported to authorities. Men are more violent when it gets to that stage. So men are made out to be animals.

Women are way worse. Could be violence or emotional, but women without a moral compass are dangerous.

Yeah. At least men go out back, beat each other up and then it's over, usually.(Not so ironically, it is when a women involved the exception holds.)

But women...their shit can go on for decades.

Well, that's not the relationship optimism I was looking for.

https://t.me/tribunalsandexecutions/527294

Maybe comes back once in a while for a 20 minute conjugal visit with the kid in a locked room somewhere. That's first class parenting.
Patrick says

Booger says

Yep. If you’re well enough off that you don’t need a wife to work and afford all the things she wants, better get a prenup. For everyone else tradition is necessarily dead imo

Glock-n-Load says

Booger says

Yep. If you’re well enough off that you don’t need a wife to work and afford all the things she wants, better get a prenup. For everyone else tradition is necessarily dead imo

Many men stay ambitous and reach their earnings zenith later in life while womyn often slow down and slob and which makes this difficult as assets acquired during the marriage are still split. You'd have to either specify dollar amounts and/or explicitly state everything excluded in case of divorce. And then they'll find a judge to toss it ;)

Patrick says

Let me guess... mom was on vacation

mell says

Yep. If you’re well enough off that you don’t need a wife to work and afford all the things she wants, better get a prenup. For everyone else tradition is necessarily dead imo

Prenup just means the lawyers will litigate the divorce AND the prenup until the marital estate winds up mostly in their fee bucket as usual usual. Prenup is just a contract, and endless battles over contracts are just as possible as endless battles over divorce.

I read something that lawyers consider themselves rightfully entitled to at least 40 percent of any estate if they become involved. They will keep the paper churning and the parties adversarial until they have achieved that goal.

It’s a crapshoot. Make your wife your best friend. If you don’t think you’re her best friend, take measures.

Ceffer says

mell says

Yep. If you’re well enough off that you don’t need a wife to work and afford all the things she wants, better get a prenup.
For everyone else tradition is necessarily dead imo

Prenup just means the lawyers will litigate the divorce AND the prenup until the marital estate winds up mostly in their fee bucket as usual usual. Prenup is just a contract, and endless battles over contracts are just as possible as endless battles over divorce.

I read something that lawyers consider themselves rightfully entitled to at least 40 percent of any estate if they become involved. They will keep the paper churning and the parties adversarial until they have achieved that goal.

There are very few people who pay very expensive lawyers to draw close to iron clad prenups, but they must be delivered well ahead of time of the marriage etc. Most prenups don't hold.

Glock-n-Load says

It’s a crapshoot. Make your wife your best friend. If you don’t think your her best friend, take measures.

Or find someone loyal and/or religious enough to stay through thick and thin even when you're not best friends. There is no doubt that with the advent of vaginamony and child suppport the natural solipsists became far less stable and reliable and cut their work in half or less ;)

You got the wrong "ism" it was Globalism and Communism.
Feminist couldn't get two cats to keep a clean litter box.

Kill communism and most "isms" will disappear. But don't ever diminish its impact by throwing around social constructs, it's how they hide in the shadows.

Booger says

No doubt

mell says

Booger says

No doubt

More properly, "Marriage is the main way for women to appropriate the financial resources of otherwise successful men."

Sheee-it!

The dude starts early on this one:

https://www.newspressnow.com/stacker-science/2025/09/18/mind-the-gap-women-spend-over-50-more-than-men-on-mental-health-prescriptions/

https://www.instagram.com/share/reel/BAPMobchBg

Happy Columbus Day!

Liberated the indigenous people from a cycle of human sacrifice and poverty!

https://newrightpoast.substack.com/p/238-young-hitlerians

Helen Andrews elaborates on her theory previously communicated in her NatCon speech, which states that institutional feminization is the primary driver of woke. It’s being critiqued as light on data. Here’s hoping she gets the book deal that will beef up an argument that’s already persuasive to any guy who’s worked for a big company in the last decade.

"Women can sue their bosses for running a workplace that feels like a fraternity house, but men can’t sue when their workplace feels like a Montessori kindergarten. Naturally employers err on the side of making the office softer. So if women are thriving more in the modern workplace, is that really because they are outcompeting men? Or is it because the rules have been changed to favor them?"

https://www.compactmag.com/article/the-great-feminization/

In 2019, I read an article about Larry Summers and Harvard that changed the way I look at the world. The author, writing under the pseudonym “J. Stone,” argued that the day Larry Summers resigned as president of Harvard University marked a turning point in our culture. The entire “woke” era could be extrapolated from that moment, from the details of how Summers was cancelled and, most of all, who did the cancelling: women.

Patrick says

https://newrightpoast.substack.com/p/238-young-hitlerians

Helen Andrews elaborates on her theory previously communicated in her NatCon speech, which states that institutional feminization is the primary driver of woke. It’s being critiqued as light on data. Here’s hoping she gets the book deal that will beef up an argument that’s already persuasive to any guy who’s worked for a big company in the last decade.

"Women can sue their bosses for running a workplace that feels like a fraternity house, but men can’t sue when their workplace feels like a Montessori kindergarten. Naturally employers err on the side of making the office softer. So if women are thriving more in the modern workplace, is that really because they are outcompeting men? Or is it because the rules have been changed to favor them?"

To be fair, Summers was an arrogant asshole - while he was in government he ran Brooksley Born out on a rail when she had the temerity to suggest that credit default swaps needed to be regulated. Then, sure enough during the housing meltdown, what was the catalyst? Credit default swaps.

Fuck Summers. If anything, his punishment was too light.

https://x.com/cleobug101/status/1979976352087384339

children and a husband are the only antidote to a life spent obsessing over social currency and beauty in relation to others and men. the substance is a prime example of that. you get MAYBE 30 years of brunches and hot girl summers before the reality of the cruelness of life sets in, social currency slips away, and younger women steal the attention and freebies, children and a husband give you a purpose outside of yourself and hedonistic pursuits. like they say, if you don't use your eggs, they scramble.

Yes, but she should have said "a husband and children", in that order.