patrick.net

When fox news becomes the only semi-reputable MSM news source...

It's a total coincidence that Fox is coming out with this now.

marcus says

It's a total coincidence that Fox is coming out with this now.

Check your timing

marcus says

It's a total coincidence that Fox is coming out with this now

Well I will wait for evidence before I decide. But it could be something big is coming out and the inteeligence agencies are waging an all out war on our president and our country to maintain their cushy jobs-so that no one dares question them or their budgets-why do we need 17 intelligence agencies??

CBOEtrader says

Fox News bombshell

Iraq has WMD!

lostand confused says

Well I will wait for evidence before I decide.

Yes ofc! Anonymous sources cant be trusted. I hope we've all learned that much

HEY YOU says

CBOEtrader says

Fox News bombshell

Iraq has WMD!

So now you trust the MSM? Makes sense

CBOEtrader says

Yes ofc! Anonymous sources cant be trusted. I hope we've all learned that much

Examples of anonymous sources that were later proven false?

It definitely happens--but not very often. I'd say a LOT less often than Trump and his cabinet are proven wrong.

joeyjojojunior says

Examples of anonymous sources that were later proven false?

The spin is a lie. It always is. This narrative was totally and completely debunked by everyone in the room.

He shared a plot to use laptops as bombs on planes... thats not exactly a newsworthy conversation. Its been general knowledge for a while.

This new story today is the ultimate in selective fact sharing. You know exactly one line from Comey's supposed journal. This is enough to start a fake impeachment narrative? Its pure hysteria, over and over again.

The pee dossier was completely fabricated.

This will continue as the seth rich case starts to break. What was your explanation for why the DNC wont share their servers?

http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/31/politics/terrorist-laptop-bombs-may-evade-security/

OMG cnn leaked classified intelligence to their readers... unsurprisingly, no one noticed.

CBOEtrader says

http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/31/politics/terrorist-laptop-bombs-may-evade-security/

OMG cnn leaked classified intelligence to their readers... unsurprisingly, no one noticed.

What was classified? Homeland security banned laptops from certain countries. How classified was that?

CBOEtrader says

He shared a plot to use laptops as bombs on planes... thats not exactly a newsworthy conversation. Its been general knowledge for a while.

So that's why REPUBLICANS on the senate intelligence committee are demanding transcripts of the meeting. Because trump divulged things that have been general knowledge for a while. You need to call up set those people straight.

Hillary would not have shot him in the back. She would have twerk decapitated him, consumed the spurting head in her labia, and spit the digested skull out on the pavement.

So I see CBOE has no examples of MSM printing anonymous sources that were proven to be incorrect. That's what I figured.

bob2356 says

CBOEtrader says

http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/31/politics/terrorist-laptop-bombs-may-evade-security/

OMG cnn leaked classified intelligence to their readers... unsurprisingly, no one noticed.

What was classified? Homeland security banned laptops from certain countries. How classified was that?

I hope you are being sarcastic. I certainly was. TBH, your troll-ish communication style is difficult to follow.

Lets review what we know. McMasters made a very clear statement that Trump didn't reveal any ISIS military operation not already publicly known. Bombs on laptops to take down planes was that military operation. Confirmed. The potential criticism of trump would be in revealing the target city of the attack which was classified information (as best as I can tell anyways.) The danger of sharing this location was disregarded as fake news by everyone in the room.

What you probably missed was McMasters also saying Trump didn't know the source of the intel. Presidents get daily briefings, not full reports. Trump would have to specifically request the full report to know the source. This makes sense.

Washpo reported that revealing details leading to the identity of the intelligence partner is the big evil here.

It is later reported in the MSM that Israel is that partner... So if trump didn't know it was Israel AND revealing Israel as out intelligence partner is double secret classified intel AND the papers are reporting the Israel as the source WHO BROKE THE LAW? WHO LEAKED INFO? It wasn't Trump. How would the WashPo know?

Answer: the leaker told them. The leaker told WashPo classified intel that Trump not only DIDNT but also COULDNT have discussed. This means the leaker committed a serious felony AND put our national security at risk. Given the small circle of people who know this level of information, my guess is they will catch this guy. Someone is going to prison. Shit just got real.

bob2356 says

So that's why REPUBLICANS on the senate intelligence committee are demanding transcripts of the meeting.

The committee doesn't have a choice. Its their job to find the leaker, and investigate all available information. They will listen to the conversation, confirm Trump did not mention Israel, and move on to finding the leaker. Shit just got real.

joeyjojojunior says

So I see CBOE has no examples of MSM printing anonymous sources that were proven to be incorrect. That's what I figured.

Your time would be better spent working on reading comprehension skills rather than trolling.

http://money.cnn.com/2017/05/16/media/seth-rich-family-response-claims-of-wikileaks-contact/index.html

And the fake news is once again proven to be FOX. You and Goran can put your dunce caps on and stand in the corner now.

joeyjojojunior says

http://money.cnn.com/2017/05/16/media/seth-rich-family-response-claims-of-wikileaks-contact/index.html

And the fake news is once again proven to be FOX. You and Goran can put your dunce caps on and stand in the corner now.

Put down CNN. Its rotting your brain. They are ofc mischaracterizing his statements.

Wheeler is quite fair about what he is claiming. He, by no means, is suggesting he has any hard evidence. His sources are anonymous DC police and FBI. Try posting his exact words instead of a CNN quote.

"Wheeler is quite fair about what he is claiming. He, by no means, is suggesting he has any hard evidence. His sources are anonymous DC police and FBI. Try posting his exact words instead of a CNN quote."

I thought you didn't believe any anonymous sources?

joeyjojojunior says

"Wheeler is quite fair about what he is claiming. He, by no means, is suggesting he has any hard evidence. His sources are anonymous DC police and FBI. Try posting his exact words instead of a CNN quote."

I thought you didn't believe any anonymous sources?

I don't. That was part of the tongue in cheek declaration of proof. But yes its fair for you to ask. Sarcasm doesn't come across well in a chat room.

W seth rich we have a known crime (murder) as well as a motive, some vague wikileaks references, and a few anonymous sources.

All we have w trump/Russia is anonymous sources. We have no crime and no evidence. Its pure conjecture.

CBOEtrader says

Answer: the leaker told them. The leaker told WashPo classified intel that Trump not only DIDNT but also COULDNT have discussed. This means the leaker committed a serious felony AND put our national security at risk. Given the small circle of people who know this level of information, my guess is they will catch this guy. Someone is going to prison. Shit just got real.

And Dems and the MSM would then need to have a cup of STFU since they didn't mind when Obama went after more Whistleblowers than any President in History.

This leak was purely for political hay, rather than informing the public of problems.

"And Dems and the MSM would then need to have a cup of STFU since they didn't mind when Obama went after more Whistleblowers than any President in History. This leak was purely for political hay, rather than informing the public of problems."

The leaker was a member of Trump's inner circle. Go get him!

joeyjojojunior says

"And Dems and the MSM would then need to have a cup of STFU since they didn't mind when Obama went after more Whistleblowers than any President in History. This leak was purely for political hay, rather than informing the public of problems."

The leaker was a member of Trump's inner circle. Go get him!

Maybe. If so he's a traitor and should be in prison. Let the facts lead where they may.

CBOEtrader says

Maybe. If so he's a traitor and should be in prison. Let the facts lead where they may.

Yup.

CBOEtrader says

Team Hillary murdered Seth Rich

Hillary probably was involved in murdering Seth Rich, but you are only condemning her for partisan reasons. If Trump were in this position with the exact same evidence, you would say there is no evidence that Trump or any of his people were involved and that the story is fake news. This is pure hypocrisy.

In contrast, I have no problem stating that both Hillary and Trump are crooked.

What we need is a stupid conspiracy theory to take our attention off of Trumps embarrassing mistakes. I know what let's do, let's reincarnate that Set Richards theory. All the alt right dimbulbs will just at the chance to talk about how much they hate Hillary. The Pizza gate one is too ridiculous. Even the TPBs of the world don't buy (or sell) that one.

Its always a plane crash, a suicide, or a totally random homicide.

Dan8267 says

Hillary probably was involved in murdering Seth Rich, but you are only condemning her for partisan reasons. If Trump were in this position with the exact same evidence, you would say there is no evidence that Trump or any of his people were involved and that the story is fake news. This is pure hypocrisy.

lol, YOU would be such a hypocrite IF you did the things that I imagine in MY head. Did I get that right?

The day you get something right physicists will have to come up with entirely new theories on how the universe works.

Another entry in the Clinton hit list, get over it.

Any chance this special cousel starts w the DNC server? What are the chances the DNC server never gets examined?

CBOEtrader says

To see if Russia hacked the server.

There's no need. It's already been proven.

joeyjojojunior says

CBOEtrader says

To see if Russia hacked the server.

There's no need. It's already been proven.

Far from it. Only Platte River Networks has examined the server. No US authority has examined it, and the DNC denied the FBI access to it. The Platte River Networks report was the cornerstone of our forensic evidence of the russia hacking narrative. If we want truth, and we want to eliminate the seth rich narrative as a valid theory, the special counsel must examine the DNC server.

marcus says

It's a total coincidence that Fox is coming out with this now.

I keep hearing the Seth Rich story broke before the trump classified leaks story. Timestamps are hard to factcheck but they broke within the same hour regardless.

So im not saying i know for certain you are wrong, but the other side is claiming the exact same logic.

Remember I told everybody last year before the summer both these guys had the dirt?

PS This is from Seth Rich's social media. He was a big league Bernie Bro and "Didn't Trust Hillary":

APOCALYPSEFUCK_is_ADORABLE says

Vince Foster

Clinton fired Wiliam Sessions 24 hours before Vince Foster was killed.

TwoScoopsMcGee says

Remember I told everybody last year before the summer both these guys had the dirt?

PS This is from Seth Rich's social media. He was a big league Bernie Bro and "Didn't Trust Hillary":

APOCALYPSEFUCK_is_ADORABLE says

Vince Foster

Clinton fired Wiliam Sessions 24 hours before Vince Foster was killed.

Poll: on Tuesday after Kim dotcom releases his statement explaining how he helped Seth Rich leak documents to wikileaks, the fake news MSM will 1) attack Kim dotcom and JA as Russian spies 2) ignore the facts of the statement completely 3) release fresh anonymous sourced fake news as a cover, or 4) all of the above.

I vote for 4.

CBOEtrader says

I vote for 4.

You're probably right. When more Seth Rich stuff comes out they'll find some Knickerbocker Dem Donor to say he grabbed their pussy in 1993.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4531696/Panic-DNC-Kim-Dotcom-s-claims-Seth-Rich.html

'Complete panic' at highest levels of DNC over internet hacker Kim Dotcom's claims murdered Democratic aide Seth Rich WAS the source of Wikileaks