« First « Previous Comments 101 - 140 of 220 Next » Last » Search these comments
What if you already are, for most intents and purposes?
Promote rationality, including atheism, and point out the stupidity and dangers of religions. Don't be silent against these injustices. Silence allows problems to fester.
Point out any misinformation I posted about Christianity and I'll donate a $100 to Patrick.net
I already have. Patrick is waiting for his check!
Correct....exponentially lesser
Irrelevant. It's still the same fundamental problem. Religion is a cancer. It spreads and mutates. Remember, Islam was created from Judaism and Christianity. If those two religions did not exist, Islam never would have existed.
It's demonstrably true that Islam is NOT a religion of peace,
It's demonstrably true that Christianity is NOT a religion of peace. Just look at the 2000 year history of the religion. For most of the time, it's been every bit as violent as Islam. Counting up centuries of violence, Christianity is actually worse than Islam. Hell, if we gave Islam another 700 years, I'm sure it would become like Christianity is today. Might as well give both religions the same amount of time to mature, right?
Again, what's the upside to tolerating either religion?
Point out any misinformation I posted about Christianity and I'll donate a $100 to Patrick.net
I already have. Patrick is waiting for his check!
Show me. Sorry I cannot just take your wrod for it
Go to any prison, and you will meet the most devout Christians
Prison is one of the most fertile grounds for conversion to Islam:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conversion_to_Islam_in_U.S._prisons
Yup. One more way that Islam is just like Christianity
Was about to say the same thing.
Religion is terrible regardless of the specific stories in the specific holy book. The acceptance of a lie and the rejection of reality is always a bad thing.
No one has ever given a plausible reason why having the vast majority of the world population believe in a lie, especially a historically dangerous one, forever and ever is a good idea.
Develop some one-liners.
"My children's safety is more important than your community's feelings."
"Children Died, Tolerance Lied."
No one has ever given a plausible reason why having the vast majority of the world population believe in a lie, especially a historically dangerous one, forever and ever is a good idea.
Man is susceptible to brainwashing. They don't believe it's a lie, even though it's proven again and again to be a lie.
Only education and time will make people see the truth. In the meantime we are stuck with the nonsense of religion, especially Islam.
Develop some one-liners.
"My children's safety is more important than your community's feelings."
"Children Died, Tolerance Lied."
Only losers would want to be slaves to Allah.
Islam is for losers.
Islam is a hateful fraud, perpetrated by a dead charlatan.
I'd rather have free speech.
No Islam for me, I like cartoons.
N m N's
Not my Neighbor!
For all the suburbanites that pay for the privilege to make it someone else's problem
"No matter who you are, or where you're from, we're glad that you're our neighbor "
(Read the last neighbor with an emphasis on Nay, like a horse) Naaaaaaybur!!
Wiillllbbuurrrr!!
Point out any misinformation I posted about Christianity and I'll donate a $100 to Patrick.net
I already have. Patrick is waiting for his check!
Show me. Sorry I cannot just take your wrod for it
Dang Patrick, all your Christian brothers abandoned the cause, real fucking quick!
Only education and time will make people see the truth.
This is exactly why all religion, all superstition, and all irrationality has to be opposed. If children are not exposed to this brainwashing there is practically a zero chance that they will become brainwashed as adults. Every Christian or Jew converted into an atheist, or even an agnostic, makes the environment more rational and all people a little less susceptible to the brainwashing.
Only education and time will make people see the truth.
This is exactly why all religion, all superstition, and all irrationality has to be opposed. If children are not exposed to this brainwashing there is practically a zero chance that they will become brainwashed as adults. Every Christian or Jew converted into an atheist, or even an agnostic, makes the environment more rational and all people a little less susceptible to the brainwashing.
Once again........Can we start with that with the fucking religion of Islam first? Did you see the documentary Tovarichpeter posted?
Muslims themselves are the biggest victims of their own pathetic religion. We do a service to mankind by destroying that evil religion first.
Stop taking in random people as Refugees, and do not allow radical religious fanatics who endorse violence to be admitted, even if they are "Oppressed" by a Secular Dictator.
Refugees should only be allowed in if they themselves are Oppressed for Freedom of Speech or Democracy or Human Rights advocacy, like Journalists in Turkey or Lawyers from Saudi Arabia.
Also, single males 16-50 should never be allowed in from a War Torn Country, unless again they are a known dissident in favor of general Liberalism.
Smith tells the U.K.'s Channel 4 News, "What I don't understand is why are all the men young? Why do they leave their wives and families at home? Two million fellas could beat any f*king army. What if my dad had f*king gone to Ireland... (and) my grandad - what if they'd gone to a neutral country like Ireland in 1940? What would happen then? Nobody seems to ask that question."
Can we start with that with the fucking religion of Islam first?
It depends on what you mean. You could start fighting Islam right now and Christianity a minute later, but not a century later.
The fact is, the only way to fight Islam is to fight all religions simultaneously by fighting the very notion of religion and faith. It's not a do X before Y thing. It's a do X and Y together because that's the only way it works thing.
You seem to have this nonsensical idea that you have to completely end Islam before you can even start to tackle Christianity. Wrong. You end them both with the exact same tactics. You argue against the very existence of god, the usefulness of religion, the stupidity of faith, and the incapability of faith and science.
There is nothing mutually exclusive about fighting both religions. In fact, success depends entirely on fighting the very notion of religion.
Can we start with that with the fucking religion of Islam first?
It depends on what you mean. You could start fighting Islam right now and Christianity a minute later, but not a century later.
The fact is, the only way to fight Islam is to fight all religions simultaneously by fighting the very notion of religion and faith. It's not a do X before Y thing. It's a do X and Y together because that's the only way it works thing.
You seem to have this nonsensical idea that you have to completely end Islam before you can even start to tackle Christianity. Wrong. You end them both with the exact same tactics. You argue against the very existence of god, the usefulness of religion, the stupidity of faith, and the incapability of faith and science.
There is nothing mutually exclusive about fighting both religions. In fact, success depends entirely on...
That is absolutely incorrect. You go after the worst with the help of the second worst. Arguing against the existence of God in Islam is not very practical as they have no freedoms of speech.
You go after the worst with the help of the second worst.
And how has that worked out in the Middle East?
There comes a point where you have to admit that your current strategy isn't working.
You go after the worst with the help of the second worst.
And how has that worked out in the Middle East?
There comes a point where you have to admit that your current strategy isn't working.
A step at a time my friend. In the case of Islam Trump is going after the Shites, with the help of the Saudi Sunnis.
One by one we will finish them off.
One by one we will finish them off.
Not without address the root cause of the problem: faith.
One by one we will finish them off.
Not without address the root cause of the problem: faith.
Dan, we can't get rid of faith in our lifetime. We can make it easier for our future generations to get rid of faith, by taking steps towards the goal of eliminating the nonsense of faith.
Dan, we can't get rid of faith in our lifetime
Why does everything have to be a litmus test with you? You really need to accept the concept of gradients. Christian faith in the west is a tiny fraction of what it was in the Dark Ages. Every bit of erosion, including that over the past 50 years, betters America, Europe, and the world.
Victory comes in little pieces, not all at once. Steady progress in eliminating faith is the only way to win this war. And it is a war that must be fought on all fronts simultaneously. You cannot win if you let the barbarians burst through your back door. And there is no downside to fighting all fronts simultaneously. It's actually easier than fighting just one front. Project rational values everywhere. A lantern that shines in all directions provides more light than one that is cut off in all but one direction.
I think the separation of church and state has been a very good solution for the west.
Christians can believe and have their churches, but they cannot impose their religion on others. Science and technology can flourish without (much) religious interference, and so the economy does well. Everyone is basically OK with the arrangement, aside from the militant atheists like Dan, and militant Christians. But neither of those are even attempting to impose their views by force on everyone.
Islam is very different, in that it specifically demands an Islamic government and Islamic law for all citizens as part of the religion itself. And this kills their science, and their economies.
Islam is very different
In degree, not in principle. How many laws violate our freedom of religion by imposing Christian doctrine onto us? Every blue law. Every anti-decency law. Every law prohibiting alcohol, prostitution, and profane speech.
Now think of how Christianity has create bad policies like ignoring climate change and pollution, outlawing homosexual acts and marriage, prohibiting sex education and condom programs. Just looking at the spread of AIDS, Christianity has killed millions of people over the past 30 years. That's way more than Islam. Indirect consequences still count.
And again, what is the up side to promoting a delusion and giving the deluded privileges like not paying taxes on their land and income?
aside from the militant atheists like Dan
How exactly am I militant?
Just looking at the spread of AIDS, Christianity has killed millions of people over the past 30 years. That's way more than Islam. Indirect consequences still count.
Now you're really stretching.
AIDS is spread mostly by butt-fucking men and injecting drugs using needles shared with people who were infected by butt-fucking. Hard to blame Christians for those things people chose to do. And the people who do them know all about condoms. Heterosexual sex is a relatively rare mode of transmission, at least in the US.
How exactly am I militant?
That picture misrepresents the situation. How about you put Stalin up there for "Atheist", after all they were very much set on banning all religion. And that boy murdered millions, practiced ethnic cleansing, and murdered on a whim. No morals, because atheism has no morals.
So that's what you believe in, and that's what you'll act like... just another Stalin/Mao/Hitler.
Just looking at the spread of AIDS, Christianity has killed millions of people over the past 30 years. That's way more than Islam. Indirect consequences still count
Dan, you usually make good arguments. This isn't one of them.
That picture misrepresents the situation.
Christianity has been around for 2000 years. For 80% of that time it was as horrific as Islam. For 10% of that time, it was greatly weakened until it was at least under control. For the past 10% of that time, Christianity has been completely castrated, and that's why it is far less harmful than it was for the vast majority of its existence. That picture is painted by hard historical fact.
Stating the facts of history is not being militant. Is a person militant for writing that the Nazis committed genocide in the 1930s and 1940s? Telling the truth is not militant.
How about you put Stalin up there for "Atheist", after all they were very much set on banning all religion.
Conservative Logic: A person who is a member of group X does something bad, therefore all members of group X and their ideology are bad.
Let's apply this to Christians.
Joseph A. Abruzzese, a Christian priest, was convicted of pedophilia. Clearly all Christians are pedophiles and their teachings are evil.
This is called poisoning the well. You should know that since every single argument of yours is either this fallacy or an ad hominem or a baseless assertion.
I have addressed in great detail why atheism has absolutely nothing to do with Stalin's regime or communism in the classic thread Tom Selleck and Charlie Chaplin are the most dangerous despots ever. Please keep making that debunked argument so I can keep referring to this thread.
No morals, because atheism has no morals.
Bullshit. I'm an atheist and I have far better and more defensible morals than you. When I do good and choose not to do evil, it's because I believe in good, not because I'm afraid that some supernatural entity is going to hurt me. Nothing you do is a moral act. It is only an act out of fear. You cannot be a moral person is you constantly have the sword of Damocles over your head threatening you if you don't act a certain way. You have no moral backbone.
It is also a testament to how vile Christianity is that despite having that sword over your head, you still attack homosexuals, atheists, and foreigners with impunity. How vile must your god be that he doesn't disapprove of that behavior.
So that's what you believe in, and that's what you'll act like... just another Stalin/Mao/Hitler.
Wow, I've never seen a more succinct example of Godwin's Law.
I'm just wondering in which PatNet post exactly did I propose genocide as the ultimate solution. Seems like Christians are the ones always calling for the entire Middle East to be blown to bits and cheering whenever the U.S. drops a bomb even on civilian targets.
Just looking at the spread of AIDS, Christianity has killed millions of people over the past 30 years. That's way more than Islam. Indirect consequences still count
Dan, you usually make good arguments. This isn't one of them.
And what exactly do you think makes this argument invalid? Do you deny that the spread of AIDS in Africa has not been affected by Christian doctrine and proclamations stating not to use condoms? Or do you think that this spread of AIDS and the resulting deaths are insignificant? I'll gladly answer any challenge to this argument.
That picture misrepresents the situation. How about you put Stalin up there for "Atheist", after all they were very much set on banning all religion. And that boy murdered millions, practiced ethnic cleansing, and murdered on a whim. No morals, because atheism has no morals.
I think FortWayne would like your explanation of why people should treat each other well without religion.
Personally, I think that people innately understand that others suffer and want to be happy just like they want, and that it's possible to teach children sympathy for others outside of the context of any religion.
Islam of course teaches just the opposite, that non-Muslims are dirty, immoral animals who should be killed unless they can pay Muslims enough money to make it worthwhile to spare them. Muslims do teach sympathy and charity to fellow Muslims, but that's as far as it goes. Is there even one Muslim charity on earth that deliberately tries to help non-Muslims?
I think FortWayne would like your explanation of why people should treat each other well without religion.
People should treat each other well, not because of some fictitious afterlife or vengeful god, but because good just fucking works and evil just fucking fails. This is an empirical fact, indisputable and proved by literally millions of independent lines of evidence. It is a scientific fact.
Good isn't just good. It's useful. It's a survival strategy that works, that has been field tested, and that has been woven into the evolutionary history of countless social species. Every single species that lives in groups from bees to meerkats to elephants to lions to monkeys have moral codes imprinted both in their brains and in their genetic code. These moral codes aren't perfect -- nothing in evolution is -- but they work remarkably well.
There are countless scientific examples in nature and in experimentation that demonstrate this beyond any doubt, even the most unreasonable doubt. I've cited many of them, and you can easily Google thousands of other examples.
A false god is neither necessary nor helpful to establish morality that works. Every social species has morality. None of them, save us, have religion or a belief in a god.
People should treat each other well, not because of some fictitious afterlife or vengeful god, but because good just fucking works and evil just fucking fails. This is an empirical fact, indisputable and proved by literally millions of independent lines of evidence. It is a scientific fact.
You are not answering a question Dan, you are on Katy Perry's level here... "Like people should just get along because it works". Morality is subjective Dan, one person thinks murder is bad because he was raised to believe that, yet another man murders at a whim because his morality is different.
You are not answering a question Dan, you are on Katy Perry's level here... "Like people should just get along because it works". Morality is subjective Dan, one person thinks murder is bad because he was raised to believe that, yet another man murders at a whim because his morality is different.
Your ignorance is unbearable. Read a book. Read this book: The Moral Animal: Why We Are, the Way We Are: The New Science of Evolutionary Psychology
You are not answering a question Dan, you are on Katy Perry's level here... "Like people should just get along because it works". Morality is subjective Dan, one person thinks murder is bad because he was raised to believe that, yet another man murders at a whim because his morality is different.
Your ignorance is unbearable. Read a book. Read this book: The Moral Animal: Why We Are, the Way We Are: The New Science of Evolutionary Psychology
No Dan, it's your ignorance of reality around you that is just sad.
I think FortWayne would like your explanation of why people should treat each other well without religion.
People should treat each other well, not because of some fictitious afterlife or vengeful god, but because good just fucking works and evil just fucking fails. This is an empirical fact, indisputable and proved by literally millions of independent lines of evidence. It is a scientific fact.
People should treat each other well because it's just common sense, especially in a well educated civilized society. Cooperation with other humans leads to a better chance of survival.
If you need a religion to tell you what is common sense, fine, you must be stupid to begin with. Atheists can figure out the difference between right and wrong on their own. We don't need the threats of burning in hell forever to behave. As a matter of fact, Atheists don't consider the morals of religion to be good enough for them.
Here are some commandments God forgot.
Thou shall have no slaves
Thou shall treat women as equals
Thou shall treat all humans as equal
Thou shall be kind to animals
Thou shall not destroy the environment
Now we both know there is no such thing as common sense. Bad argument strategist.
If it was common than all atheists would act the part of your list, but they don't.
I think FortWayne would like your explanation of why people should treat each other well without religion.
People should treat each other well, not because of some fictitious afterlife or vengeful god, but because good just fucking works and evil just fucking fails. This is an empirical fact, indisputable and proved by literally millions of independent lines of evidence. It is a scientific fact.
People should treat each other well because it's just common sense, especially in a well educated civilized society. Cooperation with other humans leads to a better chance of survival.
If you need a religion to tell you what is common sense, fine, you must be stupid to begin with. Atheists can figure out the difference between right and wrong on their own. We don...
What you can do about Islamic terrorism
Jerk off to Islamic porn and clean it up with a burka.
FortWayne is a perfect example of how Christianity harms America. Do you really think we're better off with tens of millions of him running around instead of tens of millions of Sam Harris's? Intellect and knowledge matter in a modern republic. Ignorance, especially willful ignorance, is highly destructive to a republic.
There are over 320 million Americans. Do you really think that Trump and Hillary are the best candidates for president? They were both nominated because of the ignorance of the common voter. Knowledge matters. The ability to reason matters. Religion, in any form, is detrimental to thinking and results in Hillaries and Trumps gaining power and fucking things up.
Here are some commandments God forgot.
Thou shall have no slaves
Thou shall treat women as equals
Thou shall treat all humans as equal
Thou shall be kind to animals
Thou shall not destroy the environment
I think the Sikhs have all those.
« First « Previous Comments 101 - 140 of 220 Next » Last » Search these comments
The most important thing is to tell the truth no matter how much they shout "Islamophobia!"
The media and most of our so-called "leaders" still refuse to tell the truth that Islamic terrorism is caused by Islam itself.
Some countries in Europe have gone so far as to make it illegal to tell the truth about Islam. It takes courage to fight Islamic bombs and hate with mere words of sincere honesty, especially when you will be mocked by the media, perhaps fired from your job, and maybe even fined or imprisoned.
Bogus arguments that you can easily refute:
What if those things are true, and well documented by Muslims themselves? Doesn't that make Muslim apologists Truthophobic?
Then how do you explain Islamic murder of random innocent people in Denmark, Sweden, Germany, Argentina, Russia, Nigeria, Kenya, India, China, Thailand, Bali, the Phillipinies, etc? They had nothing to do with US policy in the Mideast.
It is, however, valid to point out that Islamic terror in each country generally followed Saudi funding of Wahhabi madrassas (Koranic schools) in that country, and that America always supports Saudi Arabia no matter what they do. So it is Americas fault to some degree, for supporting Saudi Arabia. And it is also true that George W Bush's attack on Iraq in bogus "retaliation" for the Saudi attack on America on 9/11 greatly inflamed the existing problem. Bush should be in jail for starting a war under false pretenses.
No, terrorism is the deliberate murder of random unarmed civilians. America does not try to kill civilians. If we did try, they would all be dead.
The only reason we are not all dead is that the Islamic world is so weak and ineffective.
Not it's not. Most terrorists are fairly well educated and not poor. In fact, propensity to Islamic terrorism increases with income and education. Osama bin Laden was very rich.
Islamic terrorism is motivated mainly by a desire to prove devotion to Islam to other Muslims, and to one's family. "See, look how many kuffar I killed! Aren't you proud?" The horrifying part is that most so-called "moderate" Muslims and the families of terrorists are indeed proud of the terrorists for "fighting back" against dirty unbelievers by killing random unarmed civilians, such as teen girls in Manchester.
No, Muslims were always this way. What's different is that now they can use the Internet, and especially YouTube, to share and amplify their resentment of all non-Muslims and their bomb-making techniques. Google helps terrorists by spreading terrorist ideology via YouTube.
If you've done anything to offend Muslims, it's simply being part of a successful, generally happy and tolerant non-Muslim society, clearly proving that Islam is not only unnecessary, but obviously a huge impediment to success, happiness, and tolerance.
See https://patrick.net/1306992/2017-06-05-saudi-arabia-egypt-bahrain-uae-cuts-off-diplomatic-relations-with-qatar#comment-1416821
So rarely as to make the comparison comical. The difference is about 1,000-fold. For every Christian attack on an abortion clinic there are about 1,000 Islamic attacks on random people. See http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/
No, Jesus himself did not rob, rape, or kill anyone. Mohammed robbed, raped, and killed lots of people. For just one example of many, Mohammed murdered Safiya's father, then tortured her husband to death to get him to tell the location of his money, then raped her the same day, according to Islamic history.
There is no exhortation to hate in the New Testament, but butt-hurt resentment of non-Muslims is the main theme of the Koran and the hadith. See https://patrick.net/Islam
It is true that the Old Testament has some similarities to Islam in its very harsh punishments for violating its rules, and some genocidal wars.
No, Islam allows Jews and Christians to remain alive (outside of Saudi Arabia) but only if they pay an annual ransom (jizya) to Muslims under deliberately humiliating conditions, and "feel themselves subdued". Hindus, athiests, and members of other religions are officially not allowed to live at all, and must be killed, according to Islam. No other religion is allowed to exist in Saudi Arabia. No synagogues or churches, no torahs or bibles allowed.
Anyone who leaves Islam must also be killed, according to Islam. And this is actually the law in many Islamic countries.
Not the same "Jesus" at all. Muslims believe that Jesus was a Muslim first of all, and was never crucified and reject the whole story about his redeeming mankind with his own sacrifice. They also believe he will come back in the final days to kill the Jews. They use the name "Isa" and say he is the same Jesus, but he's obviously a totally different guy with far different ideals. They do not include the gospels at all in their beliefs.
Of course, most Muslims are better human beings than Muslims. If they are friends with you at all, they are already violating Islam, for the Koran says (5:51) - "O you who believe! do not take the Jews and the Christians for friends. It's good to be friends with them, and to tell them the truth about Islam because they will listen if you are friendly and don't make it about them personally.
Lying to non-Muslims is officially a praiseworthy part of being a Muslim. Muslims are encouraged to lie about anything that makes Islam look bad. You can easily look up the truth for yourself. See http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/ for a good introduction to the truth.
Sorry, but they are actually very authentic Muslims doing what their religion commands them to do. Who are you to tell them they are not Muslim? They are giving their lives for Islam by killing unbelievers. At least they are honest about it. If they are not Islamic, then Mohammed was not Islamic either. The head of ISIS has a PhD in Islamic studies. He knows exactly what he's doing and why.
If someone says "radical Islam", you should ask them which version of the Koran these radicals are reading and acting on. Is it any different from the moderate Muslims' Koran?
True, but most terrorists are indeed Muslim, and most "moderate" Muslims have sympathy for radical Muslims' terrorist attacks. And so we have the saying "Radical Muslims want to kill you. Moderate Muslims want radical Muslims to kill you."
No it isn't. Islam has made murderers out of people of all races. It's very egalitarian that way. Chinese Muslims murder random non-Muslims in China, and Nigerian Muslims murder random non-Muslims in Nigeria. The only thing they have in common is the Islamic teaching to hate and murder non-Muslims.
No, Muslim countries need to open their doors to Muslim refugees, especially oil-rich Muslim countries. The majority of so-called "refugees" are angry young men looking for easy money and easy women in the West. The legitimate Muslim refugees are nonetheless still infected with a very dangerous virus of the mind, and their children often grow up with hate for the host countries that generously took in their parents, such as the Manchester bomber who blew up all those teen girls.
This is true. But we are talking about protecting ourselves from Islam here.
Nope, there are only about 20 shark attacks per year, and Islamic terrorist attacks kill tens of thousands worldwide and are increasing exponentially.
No, the constitution forbids the government from establishing a state religion. Non-citizens may be excluded from entry for any reason or no reason at all. Islam is more than just a religion. It is a violent subversive political movement which demands that secular government be overthrown and replaced with sharia. We banned communists for decades for much less violence and subversion.
No, it's more dangerous to shut up and let your family and civilization die because you were merely too sensitive to speak the truth in time. Muslims are human beings. Deep in their core they know that there is something very wrong with Islam, and they need encouragement from millions of honest people to admit this so that they can free themselves and rejoin the rest of humanity. If you speak with respect and sincerity, they are likely to listen.
They never hear the truth about Islam in their home countries, so it's up to us. Speak up or die.
OK, then Islamic atrocities are now to be expected and tolerated and there is no reason to be alarmed. Please continue moving toward the slaughterhouse in an orderly manner.
Here are some nonviolent ways we can end Islamic terrorism in the West: End all Islamic immigration, instantly revoke citizenship and deport all members of the extended families of anyone who commits terrorism in the West (this idea was proposed by an English Muslim in the wake of the Manchester bombing), allow freedom of speech about Islam, and stop teaching that Islam is a religion of peace, because it is not. And Trump has a good line: Islamic terrorists are losers, so call them that.
If you want to take the long view, stop using foreign oil, and demand that we cut off all diplomatic relations with the ultimate source of almost all terrorism: Saudi Arabia.
Permission is granted to copy this and distribute it. Please do, in fact. Copy it to your own website and look back here for updates now and then.