patrick.net

Strategist says

It guarantees a victory every time.

This is why I love masturbation.

lostand confused says

I was curious , why he continues to respond to my posts. i am assuming if you ban someone , you don't want to deal with them?

I'm curious too, why @Bellingham Bill (who bans me) chose to litter a thread I created to follow the published trades of a different User who has a much more successful record. I know people who have made their family fortunes by following Warren Buffett's trades, but they don't seem interested in following the trades of people who aren't Warren Buffett. I ended up having to ban BB, because the ban function is currently global rather than per thread, and there is currently no "delete" or "move" function to keep a thread on topic.

curious2 says

and there is currently no "delete" or "move" function to keep a thread on topic.

Ad-hom button deletes messages pretty good. (evil laugh)

Straw Man says

Ad-hom button deletes messages pretty good. (evil laugh)

Yes, or at least it moves them to "comment jail", but I feel an aversion against making false accusations. I was once accused of marking a comment as "spam," even though I hadn't. (I had Disliked more than one comment by that user, and that activated somehow an automatic "spam" designation without ever clicking "spam".)

Dan's been in a ban rage ever since georgies shuttered up...

I think the OP ban might have something to do with this comment.

BlueSardine says

Dan's been in a ban rage ever since georgies shuttered up...

It's sad. Very very sad. I feel his pain. (Actually i don't, but i just like saying it)

Same here.

Most people cant even reply to his posts so whats the point he is just taking up space?

Hmm, I am banned by BB, too. I think he is a day trader and only wants to talk about investment superstitions and gambling frenzies.

Let's all retaliate.

No dodge ball allowed the snowflakes will melt.

curious2 says

The issue is finding exactly what he said about investing in the haystack of his other comments. If you find specific trades and investment opinions, please comment & link in that thread.

No, I will pretty much comment where I want and let the snowflakes ban at will.....

curious2 says

The issue is finding exactly what he said about investing in the haystack of his other comments.

And most of that haystack you speak of the bulls have already ate and shit..... Oh, can I say shit I can't remember all the rules to free speech and who's opinion on free speech matters and who's don't.

komputodo says

I've been banned by dan8267. My first ban.

Everyone who doesn't worship the ground dan walks on has been banned by dan. You are in very good company along with everyone else who doesn't suck dan's ass.

curious2 says

I think the OP ban might have something to do with this comment.

That was posted in the NATIONAL POLITICAL INCORRECTNESS thread.

komputodo says

curious2 says

I think the OP ban might have something to do with this comment.

That was posted in the NATIONAL POLITICAL INCORRECTNESS thread.

Yes, and I've never banned you.

Don't piss off that Adorable APOCALYPSEFUCK!
I've heard he's an expert with a belt fed.

Quigley says

a micro penis.

I take that as an ad hominem attack even if it is true.

Straw Man says

Let's all retaliate.

Effin funny!

Dan's the only person I've ever used the former 'ignore' feature on. It was only because he kept posting pictures of gay guys and I didn't have enough brain bleach to handle it all.

I actually like his tech posts. The rest of the stuff - the long walls of text I usually just scroll past. After Patrick removed the ignores, I haven't noticed hairy dick when I've been scrolling so no reason to do so again even if I had that feature again...

Strategist says

komputodo says

I've been banned by dan8267. My first ban.

Congratulations on your victory. You obviously won an argument against him.

Yep. Here is more info.
http://chataboutyou.com/online-forum-bully

Dan is unable to have a rational discussion without getting his HUGE ego involved. He starts retching emotional hair balls whenever someone contradicts him.

See, ever since you banned Ironman, Dan has all of his energies to turn on other forum members. At least Ironman sequestered him into pointless, endless, circumlocutory and repetitive ad hominem exchanges that could easily be glossed over.

Ceffer says

See, ever since you banned Ironman, Dan has all of his energies to turn on other forum members. At least Ironman sequestered him into pointless, endless, circumlocutory and repetitive ad hominem exchanges that could easily be glossed over.

A very good reason to bring back Ironman. Adds fun to the forum, and keeps Dan focused.

FortWayne says

A very good reason to bring back Ironman. Adds fun to the forum, and keeps Dan focused.

I agree, something I thought I would never say involving ftwayne. Dan needs something to focus on the 22 hours a day he is posting on patnet.

I also thought ironman was fun. I was always fine with trading hands (ok fingers) with him. If he got tedious there was always the option of just not responding. I actually respected the fact that he could find any tiny flaw in your argument.

That's right. There has been a refreshing lack of pictures of goats' assholes and overweight internet stalkers since Ironman left.

Ceffer says

See, ever since you banned Ironman, Dan has all of his energies to turn on other forum members. At least Ironman sequestered him into pointless, endless, circumlocutory and repetitive ad hominem exchanges that could easily be glossed over.

I miss it the way i miss the mushy drunks at the bar that will tell the same fucking story to anyone that may appear to be listening. Over and over and over again

komputodo says

I've been banned by dan8267. My first ban.

No soup for you!

komputodo,
Don't hurt the sensitive feelings of crybaby banners.

I'm having fun going after them because they have nothing but "You hurt my feelings, you're banned."
Someone needs to man up around here.

komputodo says

I've been banned by dan8267. My first ban.

Not Dan's first though. That guy will have one of the safest spaces on Patnet ever when he's through.

@Patrick

Look at Dan's last ad-hominem use. He is obviously triggered by me violating his safe space, and is now abusing the system.

Stick to your own safe threads Dan. Thar be danger in these waters...

komputodo says

I've been banned by dan8267. My first ban.

Since Dan abused the ad-hominem feature...

Not Dan's first. That guys bans more people than Trump at a refugee center.

I've got a million of these Dan, and everytime you mark one, I know you've been triggered.

And yes, Dan is actually trying to control a thread by wrongly flagging comments, and the threads about him banning people for no reason.

I think that is the problem when you think you are genius, you can't take any dissent or even ponder that you may be wrong.

IT'S AN OLD VOLVO. IT'S A LUXURY CONVERTIBLE. MAKES ME LOOK HOT WITH MY FLORIDA WHITE TRASH MULLET.

Patrick,
Bring back "ignore" in full force.
Watch the snowflakes get mad because they want to ban but still want to comment or click "ad hominem".
They couldn't stand being stuck in their little "ignore" world with their other ilk.
They are so caught up in their their brilliance they can't simply look at the posters name,not read the comment & move on/ "I must comment."

If this is your first ban, you obviously haven't been trying very hard!

Where's ignore?
While ignoring,assholes can't comment on the ignorees' threads.

Blurtman says

komputodo says

I've been banned by dan8267. My first ban.

No soup for you!

But I didn't ask for bread.

Booger says

If this is your first ban, you obviously haven't been trying very hard!

Moco, I have yet to achieve your greatness in this fine art but hopefully with time and dedication, I will achieve half of your skills.

no, bring it back at 1/4 impulse power so we can think we are ignoring but we really aren't...
HEY YOU says

Patrick,

Bring back "ignore" in full force.