« First « Previous Comments 123 - 162 of 162 Search these comments

Yesterday, CNN ran a story simply headlined, “Trump signs order designating Antifa a terrorist organization.” It was another move the President teased last week, and another small escalation in the civilizational war of self-defense. ...
It is true that the order did not create any new laws and required compliance with “all applicable law.” The short order’s material provisions merely declared Antifa to be a “domestic terrorist organization,” and directed federal agencies to “investigate, disrupt, and dismantle” the group along with anyone who funds or “provides material support” to them.
@WhiteHouse • 9h
Antifa is a militarist, anarchist enterprise that explicitly calls for the
overthrow of the United States Government, law enforcement authorities,
and our system of law.
Thanks to the leadership of President Trump, they are now classified as a
domestic terrorist organization.
The effect of designating Antifa as a “domestic terrorist organization” is largely symbolic, since there isn’t any standalone federal crime of “domestic terrorism.” Misbehaving citizens must still be prosecuted under traditional federal criminal law, although penalties can be enhanced under the lone domestic terror statute.
The move was less legal and more political. It appears intended to be bait, tempting Democrats into defending Antifa, whose popularity dwells down on the dusty shelf where the pickled eggs are stored. “Many Democrats in elective office have now been totally captured by a radical fringe of the far left who want to dehumanize every person they disagree with,” Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt daringly pointed out.
Leavitt was practically daring Democrats to defend the far-left terror group. Democrats yearn to support Antifa, and to complain about this order, but they are yellow-bellied chickens and have largely stayed silent. Charlie Kirk’s assassination has pushed the debate into a new phase. And Trump’s order pushed the argument a little further along.
It’s almost as if the global Antifa network is anarchist street muscle deployed to destabilize any government who resists UN pressure to enact government policies that profit UN-linked financial profiteers
11:15 AM · Sep 23, 2025
Delahunt identifies as a "socialist, anarchist, Marxist, communist
AD says
Delahunt identifies as a "socialist, anarchist, Marxist, communist
She is just a nutcase. One cannot be a Marxist (total government control) and an anarchist (no government at all) at the same time. That is like being a devout Catholic and an atheist.
Chaos is now the Democrats’ preferred milieu for American daily life. They call it The Resistance, bethinking themselves heroic revolutionaries, much like the Jacobins did in Paris, 1793-94, when they tried to turn French society upside-down and inside-out with their insane social “reforms” while they went about chopping the heads off of 17,000 fellow citizens (another 10,000 died in prison awaiting the guillotine). The Jacobins were intoxicated by blood-letting. Their antics lasted less than one year, at the end of which they were briskly routed from the revolutionary assembly hall and escorted within hours to appointments with their own beloved head-chopping device. . . end of story.
The Democratic Party is likewise demonstrably insane. Look no further than the mobs calling themselves Antifa and Transtifa assaulting the federal immigration buildings around the country and promising overtly to injure and even kill their opponents. These are not mere protesters, and everyone knows it, including the upper echelons of the party. They are a riffraff of the violent mentally ill committing criminal acts. Many of them are getting paid for their capers by shadowy NGOs, backed by deranged billionaires. In the case of Portland, Oregon, they have been protected for years by the political establishment, including the governor, the mayor, the police, who will not arrest them, and DAs who won’t prosecute them. ...
The play here for the Party of Chaos is the same old routine straight out of Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals: instigate action on the enemy in order to provoke a reaction by them that will allow the radicals to yell “tyrant” and “fascist.” The Party of Chaos is against all order and authority that is not their own order and authority — which is the kind you get with Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot: rank despotism, mass murder, lockdown, prison, censorship, poverty, and lawless law. The objective is to maneuver President Trump into declaring a national emergency so they can call him names.
“kick the dog until it bites, then demand the dog be shot for biting.”
this is very much the current playbook of the agents provocateur seeking to decry as fascism any resistance to their own depradations.
it’s all the simple, well worn playbook of “force your enemy into an impossible choice and then make the story about how they react.”
they call it “putting your target in a decision dilemma.”
the whole point is to act badly, provoke reaction, and then act as though the reaction were the story, that self-defense is aggression, and that those trying to clean up your mess or deal with your violence are the mess making bad guys.
the same people who flooded the country with illegal intruders to shift the census, electoral college, congressional seat counts, and to taint voter rolls (often using tax dollars to do it) always knew that the day might come when people got fed up and sought to reverse this.
they also know how incredibly difficult this would be, the draconian actions it would require, and how bad this could be made to look.
the whole point is to be so provocative and violent that only violence can serve to resist or constrain it, then they call you violent.
even folks like CATO are either playing a dirty game (or are simply too lazy to check their own bias confirmation)
it turns out that this allegedly ICE ziptied child is actually an excerpt from some sort of seeming fiction on tik tok. (link here) what they describe never happened.
obviously, these images and claims are being used to incite rage.
the whole setup is.
when you have this many illegals and they are so dug in and determined to resist, of course this process is going to be messy. there is no other choice apart from “ignore it and let everyone stay.”
and they know that.
the goal is to demand that everyone use “a system” to process this that could not possibly do so because it lacks the processing power to even keep up with the inflow, much less reduce the current census.
this is not a debate about whether illegal “immigrants” are owed due process.
it’s a debate about what process is due.
if you come here as an illegal intruder, are you owed 20 levels of slow nice-nice where you can keep living here, often subsidized and at taxpayer expense in a whole variety of fashions, while you wind through years of accommodative court and NGO hoops?
it seems like there is a sound argument to be made that you are not and that such process as is “due” is actually quite rudimentary and quick.
and it seems like this “deprival of due process” claim is being used as a smoke screen to mask the real issue which is “precisely what process is reasonably due to foreign invaders upon your land?”
this whole gang knows full well what is required to undo what they did and they have created and funded militia style direct action groups in the US of the exact sort that they like to pretend prevail on the “far right” and that pose such a “danger” to try to make that undoing telegenically bad. ...
the clear goal here is to provoke a national guard response and then make the story about “military dictator” instead of about lawless cities and corrupt officials.
it seems like this is the hill they want to die on.
they are spoiling for a fight and want to isolate trump and federal agencies to try to cast them as some sort of invading army as opposed to the ones coming to fix the wild mess and federal funding sinkhole created by their actions.
they are creating bad, high risk, difficult to navigate situations on purpose.
they are releasing rabid puppies into your house and then trying to make you the bad guy when you get caught on camera kicking one to keep from being bitten.
with this many turns at bat, of course you’re going to get some bad ICE-capades.
this is a technique used with calculation and deliberation.
the whole democratic talking point complex has become a “horns of the dilemma” drama machine.
they act lawless and punch you in the face, then, when you fight back, they claim the response was unprovoked and that their brownshirts are innocent freedom fighters.
the goal is to act badly, trigger response, and then make the story about you reacting to them as if stopping their misbehavior is injustice and violence.
this is done over and over again. you flood the country with illegals then make the story about “how cruel and lawless it is to remove them.”
the goal is always to efface the crime and make the story an inversion tale about ICE being the bad guys for trying to stop it.
it works well in a world where one team can control all the messaging, but poorly in a world where more than one side of a story is shared.
it becomes a self-defeating behavior that one cannot cease because it plays so well to the core base that still gets its news and worldview from “approved sources.”
but it plays terribly in the center who keep seeing the dishonesty on such vivid display.
worse, all the hollering of “fascist” at anyone trying to wrest control from them and all the stepping outside of accepted and acceptable norms and social contract quite literally begets that which they claim to oppose.
when one acts so badly and without regard to law, weaponizes all processes, and acts in a manner that can only be put down through authoritarian means, guess what you get when the people get sufficiently sick of you?
you get this.
"ANDY NGO REPORTS: First Antifa terrorism convictions in US history
Texas: Five far-left extremists in Texas have admitted in federal court to being Antifa members in a North Texas Antifa cell that carried out an ambush terror attack on an ICE facility."
Speaking of widening nets of corruption, late last week, the outstanding Andy Ngo ran a story in the Post Millennial headlined, “First Antifa terrorism convictions in US history.” Progress!
https://thepostmillennial.com/breaking-first-antifa-terrorism-convictions-in-us-history
"FORT WORTH, Texas — Five far-left extremists have admitted to being Antifa members and terrorists in federal plea deals stemming from a coordinated ambush shooting on a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility on the Fourth of July.
It is the first known case in U.S. history in which Antifa members have officially admitted to being part of an organized Antifa cell.
On Nov. 19, Seth Sikes, Joy Abigail Gibson, Lynette Read Sharp, Nathan Baumann and John Phillip Thomas each admitted to one count of providing material support to terrorists for their role in the shooting attack on the Prairieland facility in Alvarado, Texas, that resulted in a police officer being shot in the neck and other officers being fired upon."
... If the ambush looked like a paramilitary operation, the arrests resembled the finale of a dramatic police procedural. Within days, federal agents fanned out across North Texas with sealed warrants, grabbing suspects in door-kicking predawn raids that left neighbors blinking through screen doors and asking why the FBI was in their driveway.
Agents recovered masks, clothing, shell casings, improvised explosive components, encrypted messaging devices, and — in one case — an entire drawer full of “revolutionary literature” more like a freshman-year anarchist starter kit.
The biggest break in the case came when one suspect’s burner phone turned up with an unexpected automatic iCloud backup. Whoops. Investigators pulled GPS pings placing him at the detention center minutes before the shooting, along with group chats coordinating the approach, the firing positions, and the getaway route. From there, the dominos toppled quickly. Each arrest added another link in the network, another target in the growing conspiracy. ...
By the end, prosecutors didn’t only have a case. They had a conspiracy narrative: a self-declared Antifa cell, armed, masked, coordinated, launching an in-and-out, ninety-second ambush on a federal facility, leaving an officer shot in the neck and a detention center shaken.
Last week, the six cell members marched in single file into plea agreements confirming under oath that their attack was intentional, organized, and meant to do serious harm.
As Andy Ngo pointed out, this is not just a minor legal victory. It’s a historic pivot point.
These otherwise unmemorable ne’er-do-wells became the first Antifa terrorism convictions in U.S. history. It didn’t happen because a prosecutor got creative. The defendants copped to it. Their own plea deals cemented the terrorism narrative into the permanent judicial record.

« First « Previous Comments 123 - 162 of 162 Search these comments
www.q8z5DPQfwFs
#crime #politics