« First « Previous Comments 30 - 69 of 170 Next » Last » Search these comments
When one is the President, one isn't allowed to "express opinions" that contradict the Constitution.
Hmmm, Obama expressed his opinions about a Supreme Court Decision.
"express and opinion" that a US citizen shouldn't be allowed to exercise his right to free speech
He can certainly express his opinion that an employer cut an entertainer's contract over behavior he regards as crossing the line.
As can anybody else.
Just like Obama can express his opposition to a Supreme Court Decision, literally the most "contradicting the Constitution" thing you can do. Bar sending in the Army and declaring their opinion "Null and Void by Act of the President" of course.
Just like Obama can express his opposition to a Supreme Court Decision, literally the most "contradicting the Constitution" thing you can do. Bar sending in the Army and declaring their opinion "Null and Void by Act of the President" of course.
Hardly. Obama's opinion was that the Supreme Court's decision was at odds with the Constitution. He didn't contradict the Constitution at all. He defended the Constitution actually.
He can certainly express his opinion that an employer cut an entertainer's contract over behavior he regards as crossing the line.
No, as President, he really can't. As Donald Trump, private citizen, he can. As Trump Inc., he can. As leader of the US, he can't.
Hardly. Obama's opinion was that the Supreme Court's decision was at odds with the Constitution. He didn't contradict the Constitution at all. He defended the Constitution actually.
The final, legal arbiters of Constitutionality disagreed with Obama. Yet Obama dared exercise his free speech as President to criticize it. Unprecedented! (LOL)
Was it free speech, or not?
No, as President, he really can't. As Donald Trump, private citizen, he can. As Trump Inc., he can. As leader of the US, he can't.
Show me this in the US Code, Constitution, etc.
Was it free speech, or not?
Show me this in the US Code, Constitution, etc..
It was Obama stating policy. Again--not at all similar to Trump attempting to stifle a private citizen's free speech
Rules are different for POTUS however. You should know this.
There are a lot of things going on in this country to get outraged about
Breast Cancer Awareness? FUCK YOU, Pay Me. Goodell is fining your ass, Susan B. Komen didn't pay the NFL for the privilege of promotion. Freedom of Speech doesn't pay for the box seats, asshole!
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3294400/NFL-fines-players-mothers-died-breast-cancer-domestic-violence-violating-uniform-rules-wearing-kit-supporting-causes.html
I think your bias is showing. Rosa Parks is a symbol for many. Would you tolerate disrespect for Parks? Should she be dismissed as a symbol as well? The Statue of Liberty is a symbol to many. Should we dismiss it as well? You are creating little stories that fit within your own little world of narrow beliefs, which you are sure are correct. This is exactly what is wrong with the world today.
WTF does the Rosa Parks, the Statue of Liberty etc. have to do with Trump creating another distraction for his failed leadership ?
"America isn't easy. America is advanced citizenship. You've gotta want it bad, 'cause it's gonna put up a fight. It's gonna say, "You want free speech? Let's see you acknowledge a man whose words make your blood boil, who's standing center stage and advocating at the top of his lungs that which you would spend a lifetime opposing at the top of yours." You want to claim this land as the land of the free? Then the symbol of your country cannot just be a flag. The symbol also has to be one of its citizens exercising his right to burn that flag in protest. Now show me that, defend that, celebrate that in your classrooms.
Then you can stand up and sing about the land of the free."
Now what have you done to serve your country besides pretend to be a patriot on this forum along with TPB and many others ?
And the President of the United States should believe in and protect the right of free speech. Don't you agree?
He does believe in it, that's why he is making use of it. DT did not demand Kaepernick getting fired (by decree or law), but voiced his opinion that he should get fired. The NFLs response is equally hypocritical as Kaepernick's quota negro bullshit. Kaepernick has as much to do with the common black man as OJ did, at least OJ didn't lie about it, only his lawyers did. The NFL has been battling criticism from the mainstream left for a while as football becomes less popular, lawsuit mount over concussions etc. So they play nice with all the SJW bullshit because they try to extract as much money as possible for as long as they can. I think though that they are legitimately waging whether they would lose more money by punishing Kaepernick vs supporting him,...
Trump said a US citizen shouldn't have the right to protest.
He has a right to protest.
Currently, his tax-exempt, heavily taxpayer-subsidized employer has the right to let him go/bench him/not renew his contract.
Where was your outrage when Google fired that IT Guy?
I believe if you can be fired (in California, no less) for writing a memo expressing skepticism, you can certainly be fired for going out of your way (Kneeling) to disrespect the national anthem while on camera while employed by "America's Pasttime" and damaging the brand.
Hey, I think Entertainers and Artists are free to express themselves, but not free to demand to get patronage while they do it.
Right! Only Christian Republicans have things in common with the common black man!
Mell and Thunderlips can speak for the common black man! Not Kaepernick!! Because yous relate with them so well! Yous are THE champions of the common NEGRO!!
VOTE ONLY REPUBLICANS ALL THE TIME!!!
CRITICIZE ONLY DEMOCRATS ALL THE TIME!!!
There are a lot of problems there, none of which can be solved by somebody with a 114MM contract kneeling at the Anthem
Let me guess, you hate liberal
trump exercised his free speech, now if he passed a law or an executive order on the same-I would be up in arms condemning him. he expressed his opinion-oh the irony-liberals now claim free speech itself is under threat because the president used his first amendment rights-hate, hate, hate.
He would be well within his rights to express his opinion as a private citizen. The problem is he is speaking as the leader of the United States trying to silence a private citizen's free speech.
No he is not. he is expressing his opinon in a campaign rally
But by twisting this into a free speech issue- WHEN THE LEFT IS DEMANDING THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES NOT USE HIS FREE SPEECH RIGHTS-that scares normal people even more. if the president can't express his opinion-who can???? Yeah I know-only one who expresses leftie view and sings kumbaya of kapernick. Any opposing view has to be drowned out -hate, hate, hate.
When you become President of the United States, you speak for the United States
Give me a break. The left is alerting people that the President of the United States is advocating for limiting the free speech of private citizens. That should bother you. Why doesn't it?
What isn't allowed is the President of the US trying to stifle free speech, however.
Free speech is obviously only worth defending when it's Milo or Alex Jones or the KKK marching. When it's a black athlete--shut up and play nice.
It was inevitable with BLM, thug culture, and everything else that this behavior would rear it's head in the NFL. Lets see if throwing black power signs becomes the norm next every time a white gets tackled.
Free peech and taking action are two different things-which eludes lefties.
The left is upto their usual tricks-attempting to silence the president of the United States no less.
Yep. When a white IT guy who isn't on TV can write a memo on not be fired. When a couple can refuse to bake a cake because they don't endorse gay marriage. Yet an employee on live television can conduct a protest while on the employer's time, and suffer no reprecussions. However, if he wore Cancer Awareness or 9/11 Remembrance eye black, the NFL would fine his ass more than most people make in a month as they've done time and time again to fellow Players. I remember when they banned the Cowboys wearing decals to remember the murdered cops at all regular games
Joey Democrat is at it in full force today. This must be a battleground topic that was identified by his manager early this morning.
ol--you're hilarious. The President is trying to stifle free speech and once again Trumpkins try to turn it around. Has there every been a bigger bunch of babies? The only thing they are good at is feeling sorry for themselves and complaining about how mistreated they are. Get over yourself already.
« First « Previous Comments 30 - 69 of 170 Next » Last » Search these comments
He just picked a fight with the NFL and has them and the Democrats basically defending the 6-figure and millionaire players' right not to stand for the anthem.
"I'm so oppressed, I just signed a multimillion dollar contract. I just have to kneel during the National Anthem."
A private in the US Army makes $1600 a month. Is he allowed to kneel when the Anthem is played without jeopardizing his career?
The difference of course, is the private has an important job, whereas an NFL Player is just an entertainer.
"Leave the oppressed guys who make 6-7 Figures alone, Orange Douche! If the NFL wants to market itself as America's Pastime while kneeling in front of the flag (which started under a Black President, BTW), nobody should criticize it!"