patrick.net

CBOEtrader says

Dan8267 says

If at this point you still think it's ISIS behind the shooting, you're a fucking idiot.

and yet the researchers who follow ISIS disagree with you. Why do you deny science dan?

http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/353518-terror-experts-puzzled-by-isis-claim-in-las-vegas-attack

Seriously, how fucking stupid are you? First you site Fox News as a credible source, and now The Hill. What's next, Breitbart? Even a cursory look at The Hill's front page reveals itself as a thinly veiled propaganda site that is right now blaming Obama and the Democrats for the Las Vegas shooting. Yeah, because the Democrats have blocked gun control for all these decades.

And you have the gall to attack The Daily Show while ignoring the evidence presented by that show and then present The Hill as experts and cite and article that has absolutely no evidence to support it's assertions and doesn't even make the claim that you want it to make? No where in the article does it say that ISIS is responsible or that there is any reason to believe that ISIS is. I guess after looking for cherry picked articles for the past few hours, this is the only straw you could grasp.

But hey, let's all think that ISIS is almost certainly behind it because, because, JESUS!

Every time you double down on the now obviously wrong idea that ISIS is behind the shooting, you look more and more foolish. The face saving move would have been to say,

My bad. I jumped the gun and listened to the unfounded rumors that have become rampant in our social media driven society. I've learned an important lesson that in the age of instant communication, the fastest information is often the least accurate and sometimes completely wrong. I won't make this mistake again. My apologies for unintentionally spreading a false rumor involving this tragedy.

Of course, now that you have lied repeatedly to cover up the mistake your batshit crazy ideology forced you to make, it's impossible for you to save face, so you'll continue to lie under the philosophy that no matter how deplorable you look to the world, it's always better than admitting you were wrong and dishonest.

John Muhammed molested Malvo, according to both Malvo and his Mother, the latter said so BEFORE they became the DC Snipers. Somehow Muhammed got Malvo out of the Caribbean and into the USA. Malvo was also molested, according to both himself and his mother, by another family member.

Muhammed's diary was full of Koranic messages

I mention this because this went largely unreported back in the day.

Bush was trying to gin up the Iraq War and didn't want the brand new DHS to look like an expensive, useless boondoggle. The Media didn't want Terror ties to Black Gay Muslims.

There are all kinds of rumors about Paddock but the most damning evidence is that his leg is under a rifle, which backs up the "got up and hugged his rifles,his hammerless snub nose in his hand, when he tripped or slipped, and pulled the trigger on the latter". The fact that his car was full of explosives and more arms is also a red flag.

Dan8267 says

Seriously, how fucking stupid are you?

Dan proving yet again he is a barely functioning retard. The source isn't the hill dummy.

The source is prof amaranth amarasingam, fellow at George Washington university and expert on extremism. http://gwu.academia.edu/AmarnathAmarasingam
Prof Amarasingam disagrees w Dan. Stop digging yourself into a hole dummy. Try reality over your identity politics narrative for once.

me123 says

Dan8267 says

More likely, it's obvious that ISIS is not behind the shooting and the FBI has plenty of evidence of Russian collusion but is following strict procedures to ensure the chain of evidence.

Like I said:

me123 says

You really are gullible

Dan believes whatever his MSM masters tell him to believe. He clings to his identity politics like a child clings to his favorite blanky

CBOEtrader says

Dan believes whatever his MSM masters tell him to believe.

I don't even watch MSM, you dumb ass. And the only one here engaging in identity politics is you. I'll believe the FBI over you and Fox News and The Hill any day. But hey keep the tin foil hat conspiracies going. You just expose yourself as a batshit crazy moron. You just bet your entire reputation -- what little that is worth -- on the Las Vegas shooting being planned and executed by ISIS. Good job, idiot.

As an American, your patriotic duty requires you to own a gun or five, practice with them enough to become competent, and stand ready as a hedge against government tyranny. Every government eventually becomes tyrannical, thus we must put ourselves as citizen warriors, set to defend our natural rights and liberties from governmental encroach. The mere fact of us being here as a potential force to oppose totalitarianism is usually enough to guard against it coming to fruition in the public square. However, we should also continue to use our free speech rights as a counter against Leftist and totalitarian propaganda intended to advance their agenda.

That's what I've been doing this whole time.

It's not about Trump.

It's about freedom..

PCGyver says

Hey CBO this is also what your source said. But you don't want to acknowledge it because it doesn't fit your narrative.

"The group does often claim responsibility for attacks that may have been merely inspired by the group’s ideology — not directed or funded by ISIS leadership. In either case, the group will credit “a soldier of the Caliphate""
- Amarnath Amarasingam

Lol, yes I have read his words. I'm glad we can finally agree that there is far greater than zero % chance this shooter was "a soldier of the Caliphate."

We accept your apology for being wrong Dan, again.

PCGyver says

CBOEtrader says

PCGyver says

Hey CBO this is also what your source said. But you don't want to acknowledge it because it doesn't fit your narrative.

"The group does often claim responsibility for attacks that may have been merely inspired by the group’s ideology — not directed or funded by ISIS leadership. In either case, the group will credit “a soldier of the Caliphate""
- Amarnath Amarasingam

Lol, yes I have read his words. I'm glad we can finally agree that there is far greater than zero % chance this shooter was "a soldier of the Caliphate."

So at what point do you accept that he had nothing to do with ISIS?

Currently the facts suggest he may have had something to do with ISIS.

When the facts suggest otherwise I will have no problem acknowloedging those facts. Saying he had nothing to do w ISIS despite the current facts is pure ignorance fueled by identity politics.

So which camp are you in? Do you accept reality that the shooter may have an ISIS connection or influence, or do you cling to identity politics and pretend like you know this shooter had "zero % chance" of an ISIS connection?

Quigley says

As an American, your patriotic duty requires you to own a gun or five, practice with them enough to become competent, and stand ready as a hedge against government tyranny. Every government eventually becomes tyrannical, thus we must put ourselves as citizen warriors, set to defend our natural rights and liberties from governmental encroach. The mere fact of us being here as a potential force to oppose totalitarianism is usually enough to guard against it coming to fruition in the public square. However, we should also continue to use our free speech rights as a counter against Leftist and totalitarian propaganda intended to advance their agenda.

What do you do if the tyrant takes over the 2 parties, puts puppet candidates in place, militarizes the police, puts in place a total surveillance program whereby your phone listen your conversations, divides the population with identity politics, then takes out any non-conformist one by one?
Does your weapon help?