« First « Previous Comments 47 - 55 of 55 Search these comments
The discussion is about how capitalism, specifically free market capitalism, helps the underclass.
If free market capitalism helped the underclass, we wouldn't need those programs.
Brilliant analysis Joe. Also, if you lived in communist Russia you should probably starve to death rather than eat the bread you get from the food line. Wouldnt want to be a hypocrite, amirite?
What's hilarious is that folks on here are using government programs (SNAP, WIC, section 8, Medicaid, etc.) to show that free market capitalism helps the poor.
Perhaps you guys should rethink your argument? If free market capitalism helped the underclass, we wouldn't need those programs.
If the bums were willing to work instead of freeloading, we wouldn't need those programs.
This is your core problem. You consistently redefine the world around you to keep your labels in place to which you are loyal. You creatively translate language around you constantly. I've noticed Dan does this often as well (calling antifa conservative for example, lolz). TBF, right/left/conservative have all lost definitive meaning. Liberal does still cling to its original definition, but only outside of the democratic party in Rand Paul and a few others.
Communism vs capitalism however CAN be defined, and more importantly measured by metrics from the real world. For ex I suggest the most important metric should be % of GDP taxed by the state. How free is the economy?
mell saysThey don't have to work and yet have plenty to eat (so many get fat).
This narrative has been proven to be bullshit so many times I can't even count, but yet it persists by folks like you and Strat. It's really sad.
Absolutely not. This narrative has been proven in countless studies
People who earn more are also more active during the day and engage in more in physical activities - despite having less time from working all day.
Not a myth, if you would actually work during the day, instead of stealing money from your employer while posting on Patnet, you'd be surprised how much you could earn.
But since you're a "taker" (and Bernie supporter), versus being a "maker", that concept totally escapes you.
« First « Previous Comments 47 - 55 of 55 Search these comments
"The Republican tax plan is a scam—a massive and destructive financial giveaway masquerading as pro-growth tax reform. Which is why our first response must be to demand not one penny of tax cuts for big corporations and rich guys like me. In fact, if I were Benevolent Dictator, I would substantially raise taxes on myself and my wealthy friends. Why? It is the only way to sustainably grow the economy, boost productivity, increase business opportunities and create more and better jobs."
Someone who gets it. This guy wants to help the middle class. Trump just wants to help himself and his family. Period.