« First « Previous Comments 13 - 52 of 92 Next » Last » Search these comments
OK, so your response is to defend pedophiles?
I'm not defending pedophiles, and am fine with people going down for abuse. I'm just pointing out that these are really just distractions.
OK, so you have nothing to add to the Kevin Spacey thread, then why bother commenting?
it's that pedowood routinely tells Trump voters they are deplorable while they lead extremely sinful (and often criminal) lives. Same goes for HRC and their cabal.
YesYNot saysI'm not defending pedophiles, and am fine with people going down for abuse. I'm just pointing out that these are really just distractions.
OK, so you have nothing to add to the Kevin Spacey thread, then why bother commenting?
Why do people struggle so hard to answer such simple questions?
I can’t find any crimes he was convicted of, let alone charged with
Apparently Louis C.K. has a Weinstein problem too. What is up with all the jerking off in front of unsuspecting women?
Also just read up about that fucker Matt Taibbi.
The same fuckers that morally preach to us about their Progressive virtue. Scumbags - all of them.
The point is that alot of this sleazy sexual exploitation (including children) has been going on in Hollywood a long long time.
What about all the poor children who were violently raped and molested by The Christian Church?
It doesn’t get any more hardcore Christian Conservative than the priests and preachers
I will have to remember that priests and preachers make up the farthest right on the linear scale.
Is one loan claim of a sexual pass at a minor, by a 26 year old, enough evidence to ruin someone’s life?
At the same time, they will dismiss the Church pedophilia problem as an exception to the rule. That's how I see it anyway.
errc saysIt doesn’t get any more hardcore Christian Conservative than the priests and preachers
I will have to remember that priests and preachers make up the farthest right on the linear scale.
Is a 17 year old who dates a 14 year old, a pedophile?
We will have to see if the Hollywood sexual harassment scandal of 2017 can compete with the Church's child rape scandal of years past. I'm betting it doesn't. What errc seems to be pointing out is the hypocrisy of a certain group on the right. They want this scandal to mean that all of hollywood are rapist low lives, and by extension, all of the lefties are immoral low lives. At the same time, they will dismiss the Church pedophilia problem as an exception to the rule. That's how I see it anyway.
errc saysIs a 17 year old who dates a 14 year old, a pedophile?
No - cause you aren't considered an adult at 17.
There is a big difference between 17 and 26.
Of course we have the hypocrisy angle as many in Hollywood were just as "holier than thou" as the Catholic Church in their moralizing and political activity projecting their own sexual harassment problems on Conservatives with the whole "war on women" theme.
You talking about the Catholic church?If you scan the thread a bit you will see that several people are talking about the Catholic Church. So, yeah, I'm responding to that conversation and referring to the Catholic Church. I don't know why I would deflect, though. I don't have a dog in the fight regarding Kevin Spacey.
You’re suggesting that the 14 year old is mature enough to survive sex with a 17 year old, but if they simply are proposed by a 26 year old, they revert to children and it’s pedophilia.
« First « Previous Comments 13 - 52 of 92 Next » Last » Search these comments
#liberals