« First « Previous Comments 53 - 92 of 92 Search these comments
errc saysYou’re suggesting that the 14 year old is mature enough to survive sex with a 17 year old, but if they simply are proposed by a 26 year old, they revert to children and it’s pedophilia.
It's not the age of the child, it's about the age of the adult.
A 26 year old man SHOULD know better than trying to fuck a 14 year old boy. He/She has much more authority and power over a child than a 17 year old does.
Anyway, seems pretty odd that I need to explain why it is wrong for a man to try and sleep with a 14 year old boy. Lots of Taliban are pederasts with 14 year old boys. Do you defend that practice too?
This is why the pedo ring known as hollywood and its gay agenda should not be tolerated.
big,thick,long,hard idiotic ideology
In the bigger picture, I do however object to the wooly term "sexual misconduct" being introduced to include "unwanted sexual advances", which is now in the process of being conflated with criminal sexual assault. This conflation is part of a much bigger political game to SELECTIVELY criminalize any form of sexual expression by a man, even only verbal, based on the subjective and selective judgement of any woman or gay man. The whole point of making a verbal or mildly physical sexual ADVANCE is to establish the appropriateness of more overt sexual behavior. If it becomes illegal to ask, how will consent be obtained? Everybody with half a brain knows that this game of branding "sexual misconduct" is kangaroo justice.
« First « Previous Comments 53 - 92 of 92 Search these comments
#liberals