patrick.net

stereotomy says

Back in the 20th Century, the BRD (Bundesrepublik Deutschland aka West Germany) had a list of approved names for boys and girls.

I remember being very surprised when I heard about this. But maybe it is the right thing to do for national unity, to offset the harms of diversity.

They also used to have a good rule that the name has to clearly indicate which sex a person is.

Another good German naming rule:

When it comes to surnames, German law states that a child must take on their father’s last name unless there is a legal reason why this cannot be done.

Patrick says

Another good German naming rule:

When it comes to surnames, German law states that a child must take on their father’s last name unless there is a legal reason why this cannot be done.

It's weird as fuck in the PRNY. It's all toxic feminism, until you get married. My wife gets soft dissed all the time because she retained her family name and didn't take mine (we agreed that it would be useful in case we needed a spare Ace race card when it came to children). My son bears my surname.

The liberal hypocrisy in the PRNY is so thick you need the Jaws of Life to cut through it.

https://odysee.com/@FREELANDANDY:7/Wir-schieben-Sie-alle-ab--Remigrations-Hit-Deutschlandretter24:5

Pretty good AI generated video, especially the women.

Wir schieben Sie alle ab! Remigrations Hit Deutschlandretter24

Jetzt fliegt der Talahon nach Hause!

Hilf auch du dabei, #Remigration zu verwirklichen.
Teile den Remigrations-Hit und spiele DeutschlandRetter24!

That is:

We're sending them all back! Remigrations Hit Deutschlandretter24

Now Talahon is flying home!

You too can help to make #remigration a reality.
Share the remigration hit and play DeutschlandRetter24!

Sending hostile invaders back to their homes is the right thing to do.

Patrick says

Another good German naming rule:

When it comes to surnames, German law states that a child must take on their father’s last name unless there is a legal reason why this cannot be done.

Living this now. I think it's an awful idea depending on the countries laws with regards to kids. It's been an absolute nightmare with my nephew. This mainly is for out of wedlock kids. If the biological dad is a deadbeat I have no issue with the mom taking the last name on the kids birth certificate. You got 9 months to think about it. My sister in law did not listen to our advice and messed up hugely.

We now have to get notarized letters from a baby daddy in prison to get things done because he's on the birth certificate. SIL can't drive. Getting this all done can take 10 hours and a bunch of driving. Passport was the worst and we have renewal coming up in the next year.

My situation is rare, but we can't even go to a restaurant in most places without getting stared at because he's black with 4 white people. Last name wouldn't make a difference there, but with travel that 10 hours goes down to 1 and we don't get accused of trafficking. My SIL could have just signed off on it without baby daddy.

If married I do think the kid(s) should take the fathers last name. If not married, the mom's should always use their last name in my opinion and keep baby daddy off the BC. It's significantly easier to change the last name once you're married for the child. You'll know after month 3-5 if you can put a ring on it. You'll see the real chick you screwed.

https://www.eugyppius.com/p/the-european-union-is-paying-ngos

On our supersecret terminal is a truly insane contract concluded in 2022 between the EU Commission and a non-governmental organisation known as ClientEarth. In this instrument, the Commission agreed to pay ClientEarth €350,000 in exchange for specific activism in Germany. This included the things you’d expect; for example, the NGO pledged to cooperate with the environmentaloid scene and to help stage civic protests and climate camps. But ClientEarth also sold the more nefarious service of waging lawfare against coal-fired German power-plants, and this in the immediate aftermath of the German energy crisis. The Commission specifically wanted ClientEarth to “increase the financial and legal risk of the ownership and operation of [coal-fired] power plants,” by targeting their emissions and water use permits in court. They were to carry out their work without the knowledge of the German government, effectively weaponising our own courts against us.

The ClientEarth agreement was but one of many such contracts concluded between the EU Commission and various NGOs for similar purposes. Altogether, the Commission dispensed over €15 million in taxpayer funds in 2022, all of it for activist and lobbying activities in 2023. That may not sound like a lot, but we must remember, first, that NGOs are by and large an extremely cheap way to influence public discourse; and, second, that Welt am Sonntag has had access only to contracts concluded in this one year. These general tactics are thought to go back to 2017 at least and they are presumed to be ongoing.