3
0

CO2 greenhouse effect in details


               
2018 Jan 10, 3:18pm   22,995 views  70 comments

by Heraclitusstudent   follow (8)  

Direct proofs of the greenhouse effect created by CO2.
https://scienceofdoom.com/roadmap/co2/



"What is interesting is seeing the actual values of longwave radiation at the earth’s surface and the comparison 1-d simulations for that particular profile. (See Part Five for a little more about 1-d simulations of the “radiative transfer equations”). The data and the mathematical model matches very well.
Is that surprising?
It shouldn’t be if you have worked your way through all the posts in this series. Calculating the radiative forcing from CO2 or any other gas is mathematically demanding but well-understood science."


"Measurements of longwave radiation at the earth’s surface help to visualize the “greenhouse” effect. For people doubting its existence this measured radiation might also help to convince them that it is a real effect!"

Comments 1 - 12 of 70       Last »     Search these comments

1   justme   @   2018 Jan 10, 3:31pm  

I have brought up the science of the greenhouse effect numerous times already. The greenhouse effect is science that cannot be questioned. Thanks for doing it again.

It is a tactical mistake to talk about climate change or global warming. Whenever someone disputes climate change or global warming, the correct response is to explain global warming in terms of the greenhouse effect and greenhouse gases.
2   Heraclitusstudent   @   2018 Jan 10, 3:37pm  

What denialists are rejecting is not complex models of the future. No, they are rejecting DIRECT MEASURES of things observed NOW.
3   anonymous   2018 Jan 11, 9:05am  

justme says
the correct response is to explain global warming in terms of the greenhouse effect and greenhouse gases.


Does that include water vapor (the largest greenhouse gas)?

Water vapor is by far the dominate greenhouse gas in the Earth atmosphere.





What is the source of that heat?


4   Onvacation   @   2018 Jan 11, 9:47am  

Please show me the formula that relates co2 increase to temperature rise.

How well does the formula correlate to observed fact?
5   Onvacation   @   2018 Jan 11, 9:47am  

You do have a formula, right?
6   Shaman   @   2018 Jan 11, 10:15am  

Um nobody is debating whether certain gases help prevent Infrared radiation from the earth traveling to space and thus cooling the planet. Of the gases, water vapor is much MUCH better at providing this affect than CO2. A cloudy winters day is always warmer than a clear winters day, even though the CO2 concentrations are the same on both days.

That science is settled.

What ISNT settled is how much (if any) total warming effect the increased CO2 atmospheric concentration will have on our planet long term.
7   fdhfoiehfeoi   @   2018 Jan 11, 11:19am  

Heraclitusstudent says
CO2 greenhouse effect in details


Very disappointed, was expecting a breakdown on cow farts...

8   Tenpoundbass   @   2018 Jan 11, 11:33am  

This cold weather isn't a cool pocket of air that was created on earth then sent wandering around.
Winter Cold snaps and bitter chills like these as well as those rare occasions that it Snows in July in North America.
Are due to the Earth burping excess gases, heat and pressure. As it does so, the air near the rip is cooled by the sub zero temps of space. Cold air sinks, as it does it oozes over the upper continents until it is brought up to temp. Each burp sends millions of tons of CO2 and other green house gases out into Space. The Earth is a fine tuned climate control machine.
Those pissheads don't understand the complexities. The atmosphere is not static. The earth is breathing and belching constantly.
9   Heraclitusstudent   @   2018 Jan 11, 3:07pm  

Quigley says
Um nobody is debating whether certain gases help prevent Infrared radiation from the earth traveling to space and thus cooling the planet. Of the gases, water vapor is much MUCH better at providing this affect than CO2. A cloudy winters day is always warmer than a clear winters day, even though the CO2 concentrations are the same on both days.


Except there is no reason for concentrations of water vapor to change - outside, of course, the extra heat coming from CO2, which creates more water vapor and amplifies the warming.
10   Patrick   @   2018 Jan 11, 3:14pm  

DoofusRicky says
Brother bass


I honestly like the way you call everyone "brother" @DoofusRicky
11   Patrick   @   2018 Jan 11, 3:17pm  

NuttBoxer says


I've often wondered whether it would be possible to extract and burn methane from the atmosphere for a double-win:

1. free energy, maybe even a good profit
2. less greenhouse gasses (methane is far worse than CO2)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmospheric_methane
12   anonymous   2018 Jan 11, 3:29pm  

Heraclitusstudent says
Quigley says
Um nobody is debating whether certain gases help prevent Infrared radiation from the earth traveling to space and thus cooling the planet. Of the gases, water vapor is much MUCH better at providing this affect than CO2. A cloudy winters day is always warmer than a clear winters day, even though the CO2 concentrations are the same on both days.


Except there is no reason for concentrations of water vapor to change - outside, of course, the extra heat coming from CO2, which creates more water vapor and amplifies the warming.


So what would happen if the sun didn't come up tomorrow, would all this trace CO2 keep us warm?

Comments 1 - 12 of 70       Last »     Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   users   suggestions   gaiste