patrick.net

anon_c6dfa says

Dupe

Hard to top that last one. Here goes:



It's missing one: "On the Street Courthouse."

Another Great One:



(I think Booger may have posted this)

Democrats are anti freedom of speech party. Things said in private are now criminalized. Even when referring to shithole countries without sugarcoating.

CNN Airs 195 Uses of 'Shithole' in a day!

https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/tim-graham/2018/01/15/cnn-leaps-toilet-network-aired-195-uses-shole-friday

Reminds me of a certain South Park episode!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/It_Hits_the_Fan

When I hear Shithole, I think of the mouth of the Trumpcucks.

Lay on their backs and swallow all the shit.

Open their pie hole and mostly shit comes flying out

I think of Trump's mouth himself. With all of the bullshit that spews forth, it's like an eternal fountainhead of shit.

Obligatory

www.youtube.com/embed/cJH_0jxL-w8?start=10&end=14

Strategist says

Trump referred to Haiti, African nations as 'shit hole' countries;

errc says

When I hear Shithole, I think of the mouth of the Trumpcucks.

Lay on their backs and swallow all the shit.

Open their pie hole and mostly shit comes flying out

FNWGMOBDVZXDNW says

I think of Trump's mouth himself. With all of the bullshit that spews forth, it's like an eternal fountainhead of shit.

Hutch says

People who buy his shit have shit for brains.

Just look how wonderful this site is now, the civility is just overflowing. I can see why new users would love to post here. It's the NEW Patrick.net V2.0

I think incivility is defined as attacked a poster specifically. You can crap on ideas or classify groups of people, just not the individual themselves.

"I've never seen so many people fawn before Court Historians, when just a couple of years ago those same people were warning about Media Consolidation" is fine.

"Username is an A-hole." is not.

Hutch says

I agree i don't think i should be allowed to say that either.

The new rules definitely allow for calling Trump whatever you want. I don't see the problem of pointing out that Trump's mouth is a fountain of bullshit. It is ironic that out of that mouth spewed accusations that various (mostly black) countries were shitholes that generally are full of people who we do not want in our country. This is the type of thought that I could see making it into a political cartoon.

They also allow to call large groups of people whatever you want. So, you can say trumpcucks or libtards are fill in the uncivil adjectives of choice. Those comments usually just basic trolling. One just substitutes a broad category often in response to the comment of an individual poster.

TwoScoopsPlissken says

I think incivility is defined as attacked a poster specifically. You can crap on ideas or classify groups of people, just not the individual themselves.

"I've never seen so many people fawn before Court Historians, when just a couple of years ago those same people were warning about Media Consolidation" is fine.

"Username is an A-hole." is not.

Yeah but the whole incivility thing is just a crutch because of some people not being able to control their speech on this site while simultaneously demanding changes and moderation rights. I still prefer the full; freedom of speech version of this site, and why you should not be able to call a shithole a shithole is only a thought for leftoid TDS minds. That being said, the site has cleaned up a bit and people can discuss diametrically opposite viewpoints without crying or leaving. Pros and cons..

mell says

why you should not be able to call a shithole a shithole is only a thought for leftoid TDS minds

lol--it was Trump supporting special snowflakes that pushed for civility.

HappyGilmore says

mell says

why you should not be able to call a shithole a shithole is only a thought for leftoid TDS minds

lol--it was Trump supporting special snowflakes that pushed for civility.

No it was unnamed feathered animals cries for moderation or selective whacking of "trolls" while lashing out with extreme vulgarity at any opposing view. I think this civility thing only came to fruition because it is the least subjective moderation criteria. Not a fan of it, but have to admit it has worked at least some.

Regarding San Francisco though I think that the city should simply put up as many public restrooms as feasable. This is an expenditure that doesn't cost the world and would improve its image and tourism drastically. Win-win. But they have to protect their lush pensions so they cannot spend any money on stuff like that.

mell says

No it was unnamed feathered animals cries for moderation or selective whacking of "trolls" while lashing out with extreme vulgarity at any opposing view. I think this civility thing only came to fruition because it is the least subjective moderation criteria. Not a fan of it, but have to admit it has worked at least some.

Sorry, that's factually incorrect. The duck and others got mad when Patrick picked someone to be a moderator and enforce civility. The push for civility was spearheaded by said moderator, among other Trump supporters..

mell says

Regarding San Francisco though I think that the city should simply put up as many public restrooms as feasable. This is an expenditure that doesn't cost the world and would improve its image and tourism drastically.

They tried. And fucked up as usual:


"When the city debuted 25 automated, self-cleaning public toilets on some of San Francisco's busiest streets, they were supposed to alleviate public urination and keep our streets cleaner. At the time, city officials promised "a little touch of Paris."

Paris never smelled like this.

This week I walked into the public toilet on the bustling intersection of Powell and Market and immediately thought - how long can I hold my breath? The place smelled awful, the floor was wet, and there was something horrible in the toilet. Welcome San Francisco tourists!

The toilets were installed in 1995 and ever since have had maintenance problems. JCDecaux Co. was supposed to be able to maintain and sell advertisements on the public toilets. The advertising part works just fine. But that automated, self-cleaning part is a different story. JCDecaux is required to service each unit daily, but upkeep is spotty and a representative from the company did not respond to a request for comment.

"I see people waiting in line at the toilet in Civic Center and I tell them just to go to Starbucks," said Dina Hilliard, executive director of the North of Market/Tenderloin Community Benefit District. "You have no idea when that door will open and when it does there will probably be a mess."

Satoshi_Nakamoto says

mell says

Regarding San Francisco though I think that the city should simply put up as many public restrooms as feasable. This is an expenditure that doesn't cost the world and would improve its image and tourism drastically.

They tried. And fucked up as usual:


"When the city debuted 25 automated, self-cleaning public toilets on some of San Francisco's busiest streets, they were supposed to alleviate public urination and keep our streets cleaner. At the time, city officials promised "a little touch of Paris."

Paris never smelled like this.

This week I walked into the public toilet on the bustling intersection of Powell and Market and immediately thought - how long can I hold my breath? The place smelled awful, the floor was wet, and there was something horrible in the toilet. Welcome San Francisco tourists!

The toilets were installed in 1995 and ever since have...

The problem is they likely cut a corrupt sweetheart deal with that company, they always do. Automation is not always cheaper and it was obvious it wouldn't work here. They should put welfare recipients to clean up work if they want to keep their benefits and maybe offer shelter in exchange for homeless able volunteers. Despite the rhetoric human labor is still affordable - unless leftoids continue to fuck it up and raise the minimum wage of a burger flipper to that of a surgeon - and the threat of withholding welfare benefits can work wonders. Just put simple toilets in there and have people clean them daily, you know, like Starbucks does.

HappyGilmore says

The duck and others got mad when Patrick picked someone to be a moderator and enforce civility.

In addition to that, someone else has gone anonymous, and their account seems to have been nuked.

anonymous says

US President Donald Trump has addressed global backlash to reports he referred to "shithole" African nations during a White House meeting on immigration,

Would you feel better if Trump had alledgely referred to filthy third world countries as 'deplorable' instead?

mell says

The problem is they likely cut a corrupt sweetheart deal with that company, they always do.

The problem is the same, as always: lack of adult supervision.

New Haiti tourism ad:

We just booked a cruise for April, on one of the huge 5400 passenger Royal Caribbean cruise from Fort Lauderdale that includes the "shithole" Haiti.
I just hope the shithole is worth it.

mell says

Life is good.

Strategist says

We just booked a cruise for April, on one of the huge 5400 passenger Royal Caribbean cruise from Fort Lauderdale that includes the "shithole" Haiti.
I just hope the shithole is worth it.

Let us know how this goes if I forget to ask. I don't dig the big ships as I've mentioned before. Seems like they're packing in more passengers at the expense of increasing the common areas to account for more passengers. Basically adding more people, but not necessarily the square footage that everyone has to hang out in on a boat. That's the feeling I got on my last adventure on a boat. Want to see if you come back with a different opinion.

WookieMan says

Strategist says

We just booked a cruise for April, on one of the huge 5400 passenger Royal Caribbean cruise from Fort Lauderdale that includes the "shithole" Haiti.
I just hope the shithole is worth it.

Let us know how this goes if I forget to ask. I don't dig the big ships as I've mentioned before. Seems like they're packing in more passengers at the expense of increasing the common areas to account for more passengers. Basically adding more people, but not necessarily the square footage that everyone has to hang out in on a boat. That's the feeling I got on my last adventure on a boat. Want to see if you come back with a different opinion.

We want to experience that huge ship. More things to do on the ship. The smaller ones can get a bit boring at times.
Will see how it turns out.