« First « Previous Comments 939 - 978 of 1,445 Next » Last » Search these comments
That poem needs to be on the front page of something, fucking AWESOME!!
but both know the sheep will never rise up.
HeadSet says
but both know the sheep will never rise up.
Literally proven wrong by every revolution in history.
Mass-murderers told us what frightens them. They are not afraid to die but they are deeply afraid to fail. We don’t have to stop every mass-murderer but we have to put every attempted mass-murder in doubt. The great news is that we’ve already done that.
It isn’t obvious yet, but we are closing the chapter on the brief history of mass-murders in the United States.
We stopped them. Ordinary people like you and I stopped mass-murderers. We learned to attack the murderer if he attacks us in a bar where we are disarmed. We learned to shoot the attacker if we are armed. We found out that shooting back works really well.
Where we are allowed to go armed, ordinary armed civilians stopped attempted mass-murderers over 104 times since 2004. An armed citizen isn’t there at every attempted mass-murder. If he is there, the armed citizen doesn’t choose to intervene every time. In the last few years we were effective at stopping mass-murderers 94-percent of the time when we tried. We stopped more than half of the attempted mass-murders where we were allowed to go armed.
This wasn’t the mass-murder they planned. Mass-murderers run away or shoot themselves when we shoot back.
Stopping half the mass-murderers is another vitally important clue and we should pay attention to it. To us it might feel like we let half of attempted mass-murders succeed. That is because you and I don’t think like a mass-murderer. Mass-murderers already feel like they are a failure.
Mass-murderers are not willing to take the chance and get shot in the back by grandma who was carrying her handgun in her purse.
The official nation gun of the US legislation.
rocketjoe79 says
20 Gauge is almost as effective, lighter, much easier to handle the recoil, especially for females.
Agreed. 20 Ga. is the sweet spot and easier on everybody's shoulders after a while.
True story: When traveling through the EU, Canada and UK, I have had many people from these various countries explain to me that what allowed the extreme lockdowns and vaccine mandates to happen (more so than what happened in most states in the USA) was that their country did not have a second amendment.
Wall Street Silver
@WallStreetSilv
The M134 Mini Gun ...
There’s 5 rounds in between tracers.🔥🔥🔥
A little duct tape and WD-40 will have her running good as new.
Activist David Hogg: Americans ‘Have No Right to a Gun’
https://www.breitbart.com/2nd-amendment/2023/02/26/activist-david-hogg-americans-no-right-gun/
“A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”
Hogg argues that the 2nd. Amendment only applies to the 'militia,' which he defines as the National Guard of the individual states. He misses the clear language that grants the right TO the PEOPLE.
ALL totalitarian governments, throughout modern history, have removed guns from their people, which they went on to enslave.
Odd, when I was in the military, we had fully automatic weapons.
Credit card provider Discover Financial Services will begin tracking gun purchases made by its customers from April onward.
The company will allow its network to track purchases made using payment cards at gun stores.
The move has triggered criticism that such activity leads to targeting gun owners.
HeadSet says
Odd, when I was in the military, we had fully automatic weapons.
Spray and pray has been determined to be too religious.
« First « Previous Comments 939 - 978 of 1,445 Next » Last » Search these comments
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
Couple things to note in there:
1. The specific mention of a militia being the reason for the need to bear arms.
2. The 2nd Amendment never mentions the word gun at all.
So, what exactly is the definition of "arms"?
In 1755 Dr. Johnson’s Dictionary of the English Language was first published. It defined “arms” as “weapons of offence, or armour of defence.”
Weapons of offence would seem to include pretty much anything and everything, from knives to nuclear weapons. The US has already seen fit to ban some weapons of offence so the 2nd Amendment clearly has not been interpreted strictly as meaning that the US cannot ban all "arms". Therefore, the 2nd Amendment does not guarantee citizens the right to own whatever weapons they choose.
So it then becomes a question of which weapons should be banned, which should be strictly regulated, and which should be lightly regulated or not at all. Like anything else, we should weigh an individual's right with society's right. When looked at in that manner, it becomes very difficult to justify why fully automatic or semi automatic rifles should be allowed. What purpose do they serve an individual? And why would that purpose outweigh the extreme damage those weapons have cased society??
Patrick thinks the Chamber of Commerce is the worst organization, and he may be correct, but the NRA is not far behind.