« First « Previous Comments 204 - 210 of 210 Search these comments
You don't need to know every single law or regulation in detail.
and what I see is banks arenot lending for housing like they used to, or even close. There are hardly any portfolio loans available today that gave a range of options to potential borrowers for housing loans that were available 20 to 30 years ago.
If more people are able to borrow for homes, more homes would be built, resulting in softer home prices.
Trump promised to get tough on Wall St. and Big Banks.
I look at results, and what I see is banks arenot lending for housing like they used to, or even close. There are hardly any portfolio loans available today that gave a range of options to potential borrowers for housing loans that were available 20 to 30 years ago.
If you mean Dodd-Frank, that was a Pastiche of Reform that simply sheltered Big Banks from competition by imposing immense regulatory compliance costs.
Trump promised to get tough on Wall St. and Big Banks.
Promises Made. Promises Broken.
lol--that's why Big Banks wanted it repealed so badly, right? And why they paid Trump to get it done?
« First « Previous Comments 204 - 210 of 210 Search these comments
What is your most well-reasoned anti-Trump argument? If you think he's a liar, please post the video. Or if you disagree with legislation he pioneered or executive orders, please post a link and reasoning.