Islam is fundamentally and inherently hostile to Jews. It was from its beginning
No, this isn't true.
While the Inquisition was raging in Europe, Islamic areas provided a safe haven to Jewish people. It's been Christianity that has been historically hostile to Jewish people in the past.
During the Crusades, Jews and Muslims fought side by side to defend land against the invading Europeans.
Zionism fucked up a 1000 year old alliance between the two groups.
The alliance with Christianity won't last. It's never existed before.
We all know this, but I am not telling - otherwise Patnet and @Patrick will get into trouble for STOKING VIOLENCE!
It's the intelligence agencies, in particular likely CIA and Military intelligence.
Some lone guy can't take them hostage, if he can even identify the individuals which he can't, and what's he going to to? Go into a military post or Langley Virginia and hold hostages?
Intelligence agencies are in cahoots with politicians who allow this, not random synagogue attenders. A more intelligent person would NOT attack people who are innocent but figure out other ways. Screaming I hate Jews or even hating Jews as a group of people which was the case here is also counterproductive and wrong. Any of us can make a list of nationalities to hate because history which would be long and counterproductive.
I agree: let's just replace the nukes, missiles ans strategic bombers we took from them in exchange for our security assurances and let them fend for themselves.
I agree: let's just replace the nukes, missiles ans strategic bombers we took from them in exchange for our security assurances and let them fend for themselves.
Nuclear weaponry is only useful as a deterrent. Notice the US doesn't fucking attack any country with that deterrent.
The world would be better off if every stupid country had a nuclear bomb - you can't use them without being nuked yourself.
Every fucking time, and I mean EVERY TIME, the US gets a country to disarm, they attack it afterward.
If Russia was just left the fuck alone, none of this should would be happening. I mean, HONESTLY, what's the horrible things that Russia has done to the United States and Europe? Keep energy prices too low?
If there's a war in Russia with Ukraine as a proxy, and the Europeans are dumb enough to get involved with it, Russia will just cut off their energy supplies to Russia. Europeans will rebel against their own, stupid, fucking traitorous governments.
We'll forgive them 30 minutes after they drop through the triggered trap door with the noose around their necks. Useful idiots or not, they have to go. You took the bribes and the payoffs, now take what is coming to you. "Professional Leftists Begin Trying to Retreat from the Consequences of Their COVID Nonsense . . . It's Time For Payback" https://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=191646&source=patrick.net
I agree: let's just replace the nukes, missiles ans strategic bombers we took from them in exchange for our security assurances and let them fend for themselves.
Nuclear weaponry is only useful as a deterrent. Notice the US doesn't fucking attack any country with that deterrent.
Exactly. Russia would not dare invading Ukraine if Ukes kept the nukes. There would not be current amassing troops on the border and threats of "drang nach Kiev" either.
The world would be better off if every stupid country had a nuclear bomb - you can't use them without being nuked yourself.
Exactly: Russia would stay the fuck away if US did not pressure Ukraine into giving up nukes in 1994.
Every fucking time, and I mean EVERY TIME, the US gets a country to disarm, they attack it afterward.
US did not disarm Russia. US disarmed Ukraine. Russia attacked Ukraine. See: your theory is shit.
If Russia was just left the fuck alone, none of this should would be happening. I mean, HONESTLY, what's the horrible things that Russia has done to the United States and Europe?
What have Ukraine done to Russia? Wanted to join EU? What's the harm in that requiring an invasion and killing of 15,000 people (and counting)? And what did US and Europe really did to Russia? Basically nothing, except paying billions for oil&gas and turning a blind eye and allowing them to bully their neighbors which US helped to disarm.
Expanding in Austin, TX vs. moving its HQ to TX are two different things.
I guess some companies are looking for talents in cheaper markets while saving money on taxes in states with low to no income tax. Win-win if they can make it work.
« First « Previous Comments 13,318 - 13,357 of 41,322 Next » Last » Search these comments
No, this isn't true.
While the Inquisition was raging in Europe, Islamic areas provided a safe haven to Jewish people. It's been Christianity that has been historically hostile to Jewish people in the past.
During the Crusades, Jews and Muslims fought side by side to defend land against the invading Europeans.
Zionism fucked up a 1000 year old alliance between the two groups.
The alliance with Christianity won't last. It's never existed before.
We all know this, but I am not telling - otherwise Patnet and @Patrick will get into trouble for STOKING VIOLENCE!
It's the intelligence agencies, in particular likely CIA and Military intelligence.
Some lone guy can't take them hostage, if he can even identify the individuals which he can't, and what's he going to to? Go into a military post or Langley Virginia and hold hostages?
Intelligence agencies are in cahoots with politicians who allow this, not random synagogue attenders. A more intelligent person would NOT attack people who are innocent but figure out other ways. Screaming I hate Jews or even hating Jews as a group of people which was the case here is also counterproductive and wrong. Any of us can make a list of nationalities to hate because history which would be long and counterproductive.
Politicians are just meat puppets. The intelligence agencies run this nation, at least when it comes to foreign policy.
Tenpoundbass says
It's not above our our "news" media or our government to lie. You don't know what he said although he may have said that.
Final Fantasy Porn Interrupts Italian Senate Zoom Event
I agree: let's just replace the nukes, missiles ans strategic bombers we took from them in exchange for our security assurances and let them fend for themselves.
Nuclear weaponry is only useful as a deterrent. Notice the US doesn't fucking attack any country with that deterrent.
The world would be better off if every stupid country had a nuclear bomb - you can't use them without being nuked yourself.
Every fucking time, and I mean EVERY TIME, the US gets a country to disarm, they attack it afterward.
If Russia was just left the fuck alone, none of this should would be happening. I mean, HONESTLY, what's the horrible things that Russia has done to the United States and Europe? Keep energy prices too low?
If there's a war in Russia with Ukraine as a proxy, and the Europeans are dumb enough to get involved with it, Russia will just cut off their energy supplies to Russia. Europeans will rebel against their own, stupid, fucking traitorous governments.
.
.
.
hopium
"Professional Leftists Begin Trying to Retreat from the Consequences of Their COVID Nonsense . . . It's Time For Payback"
https://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=191646&source=patrick.net
Exactly. Russia would not dare invading Ukraine if Ukes kept the nukes. There would not be current amassing troops on the border and threats of "drang nach Kiev" either.
Exactly: Russia would stay the fuck away if US did not pressure Ukraine into giving up nukes in 1994.
US did not disarm Russia. US disarmed Ukraine. Russia attacked Ukraine. See: your theory is shit.
What have Ukraine done to Russia? Wanted to join EU? What's the harm in that requiring an invasion and killing of 15,000 people (and counting)? And what did US and Europe really did to Russia? Basically nothing, except paying billions for oil&gas and turning a blind eye and allowing them to bully their neighbors which US helped to disarm.
https://t.me/BenjaminFulfordWDSGroup/31315?source=patrick.net
https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/1984oborous/comments?source=patrick.net
Isn't that kind of like giving Texas ass cancer or something?
https://civildeadline.com/even-big-tech-is-tired-of-california-ceo-announces-move-to-texas/?source=patrick.net
Expanding in Austin, TX vs. moving its HQ to TX are two different things.
I guess some companies are looking for talents in cheaper markets while saving money on taxes in states with low to no income tax. Win-win if they can make it work.
No.
People will put up with any stupid shit you can imagine, we've all witnessed it.
That ends when they start to freeze in their homes and they can't buy food.
If the United States is actually trying to provoke a war with Russia - they are doing it with the INTENTION of losing that war.
« First « Previous Comments 13,318 - 13,357 of 41,322 Next » Last » Search these comments