Latest Woo Woo is the White House is going to be demolished. Today, you could see that drapes appear to be down and you can see all the way through. Those concrete barriers are around the front fountain and around the back. Of course, they may just be cleaning weeds out of the plumbing.
We'll see how this Woo pans out: "According to a Intel source, the White House will be blown up very soon. "Concrete barricades have been erected around the White House so that the detonation explosion (when the White House is blown up) will not be transmitted to the street and the surrounding area. That will be the case soon. You have seen the online videos of the late detonation flashes on the second floor of the WH. The columns have been weakened in preparation for the upcoming explosion," "
Of course this thing was supposed to be a scaffolding to hang the traitors. It was just the standard bleachers that they set up for politicians to view the Biden inaugural parade that never happened last Jan. 20 2020.
So then, Europe removed their nuclear capability to allow Russia to invade Ukraine? That's the implication you're suggesting.
OMG, how did you even get there?? How did you go from what's in evidence - that Russia is a backstabbing SOB who signed the treaty and then broke it because the treaty left Ukraine defenseless - to this "Europe wanted it to happen" spin? Are you saying that Europe should've known that Russia is a backstabbing SOB?
Sure.
They know the United States is.
Also, don't fucking stawman me.
It's PERFECTLY obvious to me that the assholes in power have been setting up for DECADES for a war with Russia. For DECADES. The West ALWAYS disarms any nation they plan to attack. Always, every goddamned time. They did it to Saddam Hussein, they tried with Bashir al-Assad, they did with Qaddafi in Libya - they were trying with North Korea, and they are doing it in Ukraine.
Countries are STUPID to disarm or they have installed traitors.
It doesn't matter, I expect the United States will collapse in short order if they are STUPID enough to start a war with Russia, and with this gang of Neocon traitors, it's quite possible they are that stupid. Nothing the US has done in foreign policy in the last 20 years has been useful to the United States in any way. Either the mother fuckers are trying to destroy the country, or they are supremely incompetent. It really doesn't matter which.
All it took was a lifetime supply of chicken wings and donuts to bribe Whoopi. I think they have to change to a wide angle lens to even photograph her any more. What a waddling pile of psychotic loud mouth shit.
Probably several times. It's an annoying logical fallacy that if you commit with me, you probably do it repeatedly.
People who "reframe what other people have said", are being dishonest. Jordan Peterson demonstrated this repeatedly with a "news" reporter on the BBC. He won't be invited on again, because he demonstrated how dishonest so-called reporters are.
You can quote me, but do not fucking do some bullshit like "so you're saying..." - no. I said what I said. It's nothing but annoying when people pull this shit to "win an argument". We can have a discussion, but don't bother me with an argument.
"Due to the expansion of Arctic ice, a group of polar bears has annexed uninhabited Russian island Kolyuchin as a vacation home. They look good and fat healthy. Extinction? Population has been growing."
An analogy likens one situation to another. A straw man is a mischaracterization of another's argument or position in order to "refute" it. More precisely, a strawman is a logical fallacy in which the opponent's case is overly simplified or otherwise misstated.
« First « Previous Comments 13,523 - 13,562 of 41,995 Next » Last » Search these comments
Short hair, no facial hair. Age about 30, coming right out of ROTC and a few years as an officer in Military Intel
We'll see how this Woo pans out:
"According to a Intel source, the White House will be blown up very soon. "Concrete barricades have been erected around the White House so that the detonation explosion (when the White House is blown up) will not be transmitted to the street and the surrounding area. That will be the case soon. You have seen the online videos of the late detonation flashes on the second floor of the WH. The columns have been weakened in preparation for the upcoming explosion," "
Of course this thing was supposed to be a scaffolding to hang the traitors. It was just the standard bleachers that they set up for politicians to view the Biden inaugural parade that never happened last Jan. 20 2020.
Sure.
They know the United States is.
Also, don't fucking stawman me.
It's PERFECTLY obvious to me that the assholes in power have been setting up for DECADES for a war with Russia. For DECADES. The West ALWAYS disarms any nation they plan to attack. Always, every goddamned time. They did it to Saddam Hussein, they tried with Bashir al-Assad, they did with Qaddafi in Libya - they were trying with North Korea, and they are doing it in Ukraine.
Countries are STUPID to disarm or they have installed traitors.
It doesn't matter, I expect the United States will collapse in short order if they are STUPID enough to start a war with Russia, and with this gang of Neocon traitors, it's quite possible they are that stupid. Nothing the US has done in foreign policy in the last 20 years has been useful to the United States in any way. Either the mother fuckers are trying to destroy the country, or they are supremely incompetent. It really doesn't matter which.
LOLZ....
Where have I heard that one before?
Probably several times. It's an annoying logical fallacy that if you commit with me, you probably do it repeatedly.
People who "reframe what other people have said", are being dishonest. Jordan Peterson demonstrated this repeatedly with a "news" reporter on the BBC. He won't be invited on again, because he demonstrated how dishonest so-called reporters are.
You can quote me, but do not fucking do some bullshit like "so you're saying..." - no. I said what I said. It's nothing but annoying when people pull this shit to "win an argument". We can have a discussion, but don't bother me with an argument.
Agreed, but analogies aren't strawman.
An analogy likens one situation to another. A straw man is a mischaracterization of another's argument or position in order to "refute" it. More precisely, a strawman is a logical fallacy in which the opponent's case is overly simplified or otherwise misstated.
https://t.me/JovanHuttonPulitzer/3788?source=patrick.net
« First « Previous Comments 13,523 - 13,562 of 41,995 Next » Last » Search these comments