An old coworker recently told me that for the social democrats in sillycon valley, it was always a real person on the other end of those text messages. Hes a software angineer, and kinda laughed when he said it since it was so surprising to him when he worked for them. They do use automation, but that doesnt mean they dont read replies and interact. In fact, most online support is done this way now - they use tools to make it easy for them to rapidly communicate.
Interesting. Not a single one of the GOP campaigns bombarding my phone with pleas to donate have ever answered a single question I asked.
But again, now that election fraud has been institutionalized by Democrats, how do we get rid of it?
It requires votes to set up a fair electoral system (no machines, always paper, always in person, with ID, etc) but those needed votes will be swamped by illegal votes the way things are now.
The mantras are now: "They did it again". And again. And again. And again. Like, a regular incorporated feature, rather than, "wow, did they cheat?" Congratulations on pattern recognition. https://t.me/davidavocadowolfe/78898
« First « Previous Comments 19,212 - 19,251 of 41,634 Next » Last » Search these comments
Interesting. Not a single one of the GOP campaigns bombarding my phone with pleas to donate have ever answered a single question I asked.
probably how every election would look if ballot stuffing was made illegal… aka ballot harvesting.
It requires votes to set up a fair electoral system (no machines, always paper, always in person, with ID, etc) but those needed votes will be swamped by illegal votes the way things are now.
370,706 = 56.6%
while
844,669 = only 41.06%
Any questions?"
Lol, looks like the programmer involved in the cheating forgot to flip the actual numbers.
https://t.me/davidavocadowolfe/78898
« First « Previous Comments 19,212 - 19,251 of 41,634 Next » Last » Search these comments