Perjuring yourself in front of Congress is a status symbol, not a crime (by dint of complete non-enforcement, not statute). I imagine they keep tallies and brag about it at cocktail parties.
"Senator, let me be perfectly clear..." Is the new plausible deniability.
Because his kids are on the same international treasonous payrolls. Maybe he should start an organization "Mormons for Hunter" with a crack pipe coat of arms. https://t.me/gatewaypunditofficial/22213
Gee, you'd almost think they had another coupla trillion in printing press fiat bux and Ukraine laundered money to float the fraud again. https://t.me/gatewaypunditofficial/22216
Pure Hopium? I wouldn't bet that SCOTUS does anything courageous. SCOTUS would have to be surrounded by bodyguards and troops, in an 'airplane proof' bunker if they accepted this case. Unless, of course, something big is actually pending, which it never seems to be. https://t.me/gatewaypunditofficial/22223
Pure Hopium? I wouldn't bet that SCOTUS does anything courageous. SCOTUS would have to be surrounded by bodyguards and troops, in an 'airplane proof' bunker if they accepted this case. Unless, of course, something big is actually pending, which it never seems to be.
Discussion in the woosphere about why this case is being heard. TLDR: This is either a shot across the bow of Congress (who are threatening to pack the court or remove lifetime tenure because of the Roe v. Wade decision) or a setup for a Mexican standoff between SCOTUS and Congress.
They were always laughing at our freedoms, our laws, our Constitution, scorned our humanity for psychopathic ends. They just came out of the closet because in their arrogance they thought we were powerless. I guess we'll see about that.
« First « Previous Comments 19,836 - 19,875 of 41,410 Next » Last » Search these comments
"Senator, let me be perfectly clear..."
Is the new plausible deniability.
nuts, crazy video
https://t.me/gatewaypunditofficial/22213
https://t.me/gatewaypunditofficial/22216
https://t.me/gatewaypunditofficial/22223
I dunno, it actually is on the SCOTUS docket to be heard 1/6/2023:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=%2Fdocket%2Fdocketfiles%2Fhtml%2Fpublic%2F22-380.html
Discussion in the woosphere about why this case is being heard. TLDR: This is either a shot across the bow of Congress (who are threatening to pack the court or remove lifetime tenure because of the Roe v. Wade decision) or a setup for a Mexican standoff between SCOTUS and Congress.
original link
https://www.latimes.com/world/middleeast/la-fg-cia-pentagon-isis-20160327-story.html
It's from a film called Avalanche.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avalanche_(1978_film)
Told you I used to be a film buff.
« First « Previous Comments 19,836 - 19,875 of 41,410 Next » Last » Search these comments