Because that's EXACTLY what happened. Judith Miller got a letter, but it did not contain anthrax - but a harmless powder, but had the same letter in it that the congressmen got - this was to give her plausible deniability, because she was a propagandist for the Iraq War working at the NY Times.
« First « Previous Comments 22,279 - 22,318 of 42,079 Next » Last » Search these comments
https://t.me/FirstAmendmentPraetorian/35010
More like it was spread by television and "news" papers.. The Internet is the only antidote, and that's been LONG under attack.
Just embedding it:
original link
Because that's EXACTLY what happened. Judith Miller got a letter, but it did not contain anthrax - but a harmless powder, but had the same letter in it that the congressmen got - this was to give her plausible deniability, because she was a propagandist for the Iraq War working at the NY Times.
« First « Previous Comments 22,279 - 22,318 of 42,079 Next » Last » Search these comments