that’s fake news, bill stops employers from forcing employees to do that.
It will create business opportunities for Security Guard companies. The bill only prohibits store employees, not hired security working for 3rd party companies.
that’s fake news, bill stops employers from forcing employees to do that.
It's virtue signaling via nanny-State to give employees ammunition to use against employers in alliance with the shop lifters. Basically, deputizing the shop lifters against the business isn't enough, they are deputizing the employees as well to create a litigation trap and also to protect the primary deputized shoplifters.
If a shoplifter 'injures' an employee, with or without intervention, the employer is responsible. The burden is lifted from the shoplifter to the employer. Employer winds up both robbed and sued by a 'slip and fall' employee.
So, a security agency isn't an employee? Where is the language that provides an exception to security agencies?
« First « Previous Comments 25,356 - 25,395 of 41,308 Next » Last » Search these comments
Ironic, cause after marriage is when the BJs stop.
man doesn’t this gay shit disgust you? president with all that gay shit everywhere, just so fucking sick. absurd stupid culture.
that’s fake news, bill stops employers from forcing employees to do that.
It will create business opportunities for Security Guard companies. The bill only prohibits store employees, not hired security working for 3rd party companies.
It's virtue signaling via nanny-State to give employees ammunition to use against employers in alliance with the shop lifters. Basically, deputizing the shop lifters against the business isn't enough, they are deputizing the employees as well to create a litigation trap and also to protect the primary deputized shoplifters.
If a shoplifter 'injures' an employee, with or without intervention, the employer is responsible. The burden is lifted from the shoplifter to the employer. Employer winds up both robbed and sued by a 'slip and fall' employee.
So, a security agency isn't an employee? Where is the language that provides an exception to security agencies?
« First « Previous Comments 25,356 - 25,395 of 41,308 Next » Last » Search these comments