by Patrick ➕follow (60) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 26,182 - 26,221 of 38,461 Next » Last » Search these comments
Look through this thread, I did the work
richwicks says
Look through this thread, I did the work
You literally didn't do anything but find a link that was already on the image. People that actually analyze the data do the work.
I'm constantly vexxed by people
It's pretty clear that you have no idea what Ethical Skeptic has been up to for a few years now. He's been blowing the whistle on the dangers of lockdowns, vaccines and other narrative driven bullshit by using actual data.
DhammaStep says
It's pretty clear that you have no idea what Ethical Skeptic has been up to for a few years now. He's been blowing the whistle on the dangers of lockdowns, vaccines and other narrative driven bullshit by using actual data.
No, I don't. You know why? NOBODY INCLUDED A LINK to him.
I guess I ought to know everybody.
I'll just rely on CENSORED SEARCH ENGINES to find out anything about him.
Because a link is just fucking impossible to include. It took me about 10 second to write this WHY BOTHER TO INCLUDE THAT? That would make it easy, rather than having to go through 10 search engines to find it.
I'm constantly vexxed by people
, I had to spend an hour tracking down the Twitter post,
Most of that is your own personal problem. I have no problem finding information on my own when presented with key data.
I don't believe you
That's great: https://www.qwant.com/?q=twitter.com%3A+ethicalskeptic+remdesivir+2023&t=web
Look, if you can't either admit you're wrong or demonstrate where ES is wrong or demonstrate where ES is wrong.
I'm not saying he's wrong.
"So, considering his background, I doubt it's true.
Did YOU reconstruct the data?
LMAO. You make wild speculation based on an emotional response to meager information and somehow I'm on the hook for disproving your claims?
"Those who have made arguments that Remdesivir was deadly, have a data to back up their contention as a hypothesis."
You'll just blindly believe him
richwicks says
You'll just blindly believe him
You embarass yourself with condescension. You've made several wild claims with no evidence and claim to take the superior position.
Tell me, why do you believe him?
richwicks says
Tell me, why do you believe him?
Why do you believe you deserve a dialogue now?
You haven't acknowledged that you made a claim that something is misinformation without actually looking at it.
You didn't answer my question
You don't want a dialogue because you realize I'm correct
Prime narcissism. Your claims and questions must be answered but mine must be ignored
What is so hard about including sources to claims?
I know why you would avoid this. You're lying or spreading incorrect information.
HAHAHAHAHAHA. You're right! I don't want to talk to you because you're so right about everything!
It's not that you see everything black and white like a teenager that makes immediate judgements without data to back it up then demands everyone else be held to a higher standard.
Remdesivir is deadly, period
« First « Previous Comments 26,182 - 26,221 of 38,461 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,211,557 comments by 14,408 users - KgK one online now