Your insistence on this after we've looked at it before is the ultimate example of the pathological dishonesty required to be a TRump Cuck. No better than Trump himself.
Marcus, the Golden Child said the jobs were never coming back. We've seen almost half a million of them come roaring back in just 21 months.
You did not address the huge role that Trump's Regulatory Rollback played in bringing jobs back, as well as reciprocal and putative tariffs on dishonest trade partners.
The fact is that almost 3 years into the Trump Presidency, the job growth and economic growth has been vastly superior to that of the Obama Administration.
Had 2009 and beyond been an ordinary recovery, the job gains and the growth should back been front loaded, not end loaded. That is, the biggest gains and growth should have been seen around 2011-2013, not in 2017-2019.
You prove Obama to probably be correct. He didn't say it would never increase again. He said it wasn't coming back. Bama is a wonk, so he understands all to well that automation destroyed more American manufacturing jobs than exporting manufacturing jobs did.
Obama said they were NEVER coming back, Marcus. That's not "They might come back for a while, then go away again".
Obama is not a wonk, he was a goddamned Community Organizer and probably somebody's Operative.
: I mostly associate with working class people. And I consider myself working class.
Really? What do you do?
One of my friends painted cabinets. He had to compete against illegal immigrants for the same job. He dropped out of high school in 11th grade. He had to take money under the table because that's how illegal immigrants get paid and his boss couldn't otherwise hire him.
He was very fearful that if he was caught, he was going to go to jail for tax evasion. The illegals they just disappear.
That's the situation for working class. You have NO FUCKING IDEA about this group.
I find the idea that science will never be able to make inferences form data, or that conclusions will always be based on someones agenda, not only ridiculously cynical, it's also just outright stupid.
When the economy is good, that's when you bring annual deficits down !
Good luck with that - did not happen in St. Obama last years, and will not happen with tRUMP as well. We are likely in a recession again and i wonder how much more capacity for debt accumulation we have now. Last time we saw some decrease of US Debt was during Slick Willie's time.
When the economy is good, that's when you bring annual deficits down !
I was disappointed to see us deficit spend so much at this stage. I don't claim to really understand economics at the nation or world scale, but the "run the cards up to stimulate during a recession, pay the cards off afterwards" seems reasonable to me.
I can think of 2 supporting reasons for the tax cuts / reform: 1) tax reform will help keep companies in the usa, where we benefit more from them opposed to more proliferation of offshore usa-company-but-not-really-usa-company. I don't know if the tax breaks we give corps will in return provide a net gain for the country after all factors are considered. it seems very complicated to calculate. I do know that many companies have moved to china to save on costs, and so anything we do will affect that invisible cost line that every corp considers every year when deciding if they should relocate.
2) its our spinach for the china trade war: "winning" this trade war could have huge implications. I'm not sure how good of a result we will get from a new deal w/ them, but considering how tough China is playing, I'm guessing they know how high the stakes are here too. The stakes are very big. Hell, IP theft alone is worth so much money. A win here could be worth taking on a lot of debt in the interim.
A trade war probably has many of the same negative components as a recession. If Trump did the tax reform and deficit spending to give us some redbull to help weather the fight w/ China, then I think that's some pretty pro strategy.
You want to look for a "-" symbol in the 3rd column.
Funny how politicians lie, even when it seems to help "the other side", isn't it? Politicians will lie to your face, even when it's TRIVIAL to check their claims. They think nobody ever looks anything up, and for the most part - they're entirely correct.
I was thinking that investigating Biden's influence peddling was just the start. Trouble is, it seems too many politicians on both sides see selling influence as a perk of the job to make up for what they think is a too low salary. My opinion is that if the salary is too low, just do one or two terms and return to private business.
The Whistleblower was fed a barium meal. Trump is pushing the hand of Congress to begin impeachment now, and not next year.
He is going to continually hammer home that Congress isn't really impeaching until they pass a resolution, which is exactly what Pelosi doesn't want her dumb base of Liberal Arts majors to realize.
« First « Previous Comments 2,858 - 2,897 of 42,223 Next » Last » Search these comments
Marcus, the Golden Child said the jobs were never coming back. We've seen almost half a million of them come roaring back in just 21 months.
You did not address the huge role that Trump's Regulatory Rollback played in bringing jobs back, as well as reciprocal and putative tariffs on dishonest trade partners.
The fact is that almost 3 years into the Trump Presidency, the job growth and economic growth has been vastly superior to that of the Obama Administration.
Had 2009 and beyond been an ordinary recovery, the job gains and the growth should back been front loaded, not end loaded. That is, the biggest gains and growth should have been seen around 2011-2013, not in 2017-2019.
6 degree DROPS! IN TEMPS! SOOT THE POLES NOW!
Obama said they were NEVER coming back, Marcus. That's not "They might come back for a while, then go away again".
Obama is not a wonk, he was a goddamned Community Organizer and probably somebody's Operative.
And a toady of Saul-Patron Saint of Losers-Alinsky
Want to absolutely guarantee more Trump voters?
That will do it.
Woah, where did that come from.
Just saying that you won't convert anyone to your point of view by insulting them.
How about getting back to the business of representing the working class rather than representing only tech billionaires and gays?
You don't know a single person in the working class do you, much less talk to them?
No, he led us into the Syrian and Libyan wars. You don't know, because you don't fight these wars and don't know anybody that does.
Really? What do you do?
One of my friends painted cabinets. He had to compete against illegal immigrants for the same job. He dropped out of high school in 11th grade. He had to take money under the table because that's how illegal immigrants get paid and his boss couldn't otherwise hire him.
He was very fearful that if he was caught, he was going to go to jail for tax evasion. The illegals they just disappear.
That's the situation for working class. You have NO FUCKING IDEA about this group.
Do you ever get tired of these fictions?
Go to Flint Michigan and talk to some people there. The vast majority of people are apolitical. They have no faith in the system.
Reality disagrees. Working class doing much better with trump, not even close
Which con? Be specific.
Ambiguous memes cant be debated. pure emotion void of facts seems to be what you are going for.
Their models are wrong too!
Getting personal!
It wasn't one scientist, either.
EVERYBODY knows
We've always been at war with EastAsiaThe Climate was always Warming for 150 years.Good luck with that - did not happen in St. Obama last years, and will not happen with tRUMP as well. We are likely in a recession again and i wonder how much more capacity for debt accumulation we have now.
Last time we saw some decrease of US Debt was during Slick Willie's time.
No overpaid California teacher can be working class.
I was disappointed to see us deficit spend so much at this stage. I don't claim to really understand economics at the nation or world scale, but the "run the cards up to stimulate during a recession, pay the cards off afterwards" seems reasonable to me.
I can think of 2 supporting reasons for the tax cuts / reform:
1) tax reform will help keep companies in the usa, where we benefit more from them opposed to more proliferation of offshore usa-company-but-not-really-usa-company. I don't know if the tax breaks we give corps will in return provide a net gain for the country after all factors are considered. it seems very complicated to calculate. I do know that many companies have moved to china to save on costs, and so anything we do will affect that invisible cost line that every corp considers every year when deciding if they should relocate.
2) its our spinach for the china trade war:
"winning" this trade war could have huge implications. I'm not sure how good of a result we will get from a new deal w/ them, but considering how tough China is playing, I'm guessing they know how high the stakes are here too. The stakes are very big. Hell, IP theft alone is worth so much money. A win here could be worth taking on a lot of debt in the interim.
A trade war probably has many of the same negative components as a recession. If Trump did the tax reform and deficit spending to give us some redbull to help weather the fight w/ China, then I think that's some pretty pro strategy.
Haha, look at the national debt year over year, and tell me what year it was that the US Debt ACTUALLY saw a decrease. Here, I can help:
http://www.polidiotic.com/by-the-numbers/us-national-debt-by-year/
You want to look for a "-" symbol in the 3rd column.
Funny how politicians lie, even when it seems to help "the other side", isn't it? Politicians will lie to your face, even when it's TRIVIAL to check their claims. They think nobody ever looks anything up, and for the most part - they're entirely correct.
Here let me help you!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ann_Dunham
Stanley Armour Dunham, Ann Dunham, Maya Soetoro and Barack Obama, mid-1970s (l to r)
I was thinking that investigating Biden's influence peddling was just the start. Trouble is, it seems too many politicians on both sides see selling influence as a perk of the job to make up for what they think is a too low salary. My opinion is that if the salary is too low, just do one or two terms and return to private business.
www.youtube.com/embed/4p8Aq5BM9io
Benghazi was not an impeachment "Hearing", just like the above is not a meme but a tweet.
No impeachment process has ever begun without the House voting. Not Clinton, Not Andrew Johnson.
Nadler, when the Republicans were thinking about Clinton's impeachment, demanded and received a vote on a resolution to begin the process.
Pelosi is refusing one, because Dems are hypocrites.
The Democrats are in "Unprecedented" Territory.
Pelosi is trying to squat on the john to satisfy the Squad and Base, without actually taking a shit as precedence requires.
If it's not an official committee created by House Resolution, there is no burden to comply.
Keep believing that.
The Whistleblower was fed a barium meal. Trump is pushing the hand of Congress to begin impeachment now, and not next year.
He is going to continually hammer home that Congress isn't really impeaching until they pass a resolution, which is exactly what Pelosi doesn't want her dumb base of Liberal Arts majors to realize.
« First « Previous Comments 2,858 - 2,897 of 42,223 Next » Last » Search these comments