Political Humor Thread
invite response
2019 Feb 17, 4:30pm 2,448,105 views 36,683 comments
by Patrick ➕follow (56) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 71 - 110 of 36,683 Next » Last » Search these comments
71
Reality
2019 Mar 1, 12:31am
jazz_music says
Clinton was doing a female subordinate while in public office . . . i.e. fitting the very definition of abuse of power on top of sexual harassment
Trump was a private citizen, and the affair took place when Trump neither held public office nor had any supervisory power over the women
The two are not at all comparable. Surprising that the #MeToo movement hasn't taught the difference.
Clinton was doing a female subordinate while in public office . . . i.e. fitting the very definition of abuse of power on top of sexual harassment
Trump was a private citizen, and the affair took place when Trump neither held public office nor had any supervisory power over the women
The two are not at all comparable. Surprising that the #MeToo movement hasn't taught the difference.
72
Reality
2019 Mar 1, 12:37am
marcus says
After having started her career by literally whoring herself to Willie Brown (and getting paid in public funds), Karmala Harris has not only kept her Senate seat, but also now running for President!
After having started her career by literally whoring herself to Willie Brown (and getting paid in public funds), Karmala Harris has not only kept her Senate seat, but also now running for President!
73
Reality
2019 Mar 1, 12:46am
jazz_music says
The answers are trivial:
1. He and/or his wife have jobs or own businesses that make much more than his Senator's pay. Not every senator is a jobless loser like Obama was. In fact, people who have higher paying jobs before becoming politicians tend to be less easily bought and paid for . . . as their buy-out threshold would be higher.
2. Investment income. e.g. Apple stock appreciated much more than 800% during that same decade.
The answers are trivial:
1. He and/or his wife have jobs or own businesses that make much more than his Senator's pay. Not every senator is a jobless loser like Obama was. In fact, people who have higher paying jobs before becoming politicians tend to be less easily bought and paid for . . . as their buy-out threshold would be higher.
2. Investment income. e.g. Apple stock appreciated much more than 800% during that same decade.
75
AD
2019 Mar 1, 2:00am
AD
2019 Mar 1, 2:00am
I rather have a billionaire become President than have a President become a multimillionaire or billionaire.
76
Tenpoundbass
2019 Mar 1, 4:49am
Tenpoundbass
2019 Mar 1, 4:49am
Marcus the issue is to sophisticated for a partisan Liberal like yourself to understand. That's OK! IF you did understand politics to begin with, you wouldn't be a Democrat.
But being ignorant can be fun too! I know but you want to be sophisticated, perhaps someday you'll wake up and understand Liberalism is a deadend road.
But being ignorant can be fun too! I know but you want to be sophisticated, perhaps someday you'll wake up and understand Liberalism is a deadend road.
77
Onvacation
2019 Mar 1, 6:19am
Onvacation
2019 Mar 1, 6:19am
Reality says
3. Legalized insider trading for congress people.
1. He and/or his wife have jobs or own businesses that make much more than his Senator's pay. Not every senator is a jobless loser like Obama was. In fact, people who have higher paying jobs before becoming politicians tend to be less easily bought and paid for . . . as their buy-out threshold would be higher.
2. Investment income. e.g. Apple stock appreciate much more than 800% during that same decade.
3. Legalized insider trading for congress people.
100
Tenpoundbass
2019 Mar 2, 6:20am
Tenpoundbass
2019 Mar 2, 6:20am
FWIW I'm not trying to flood this thread, there is just a lot of Good ones in my Gab Feed ready to go every time we do this.
« First « Previous Comments 71 - 110 of 36,683 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,195,232 comments by 14,007 users - Blue, brazil66, Patrick, richwicks online now