I think there is something institutionally wrong with anyone under 62 that would intentionally desire to live in a multifamily building, to the point that they would buy or rent one, for more than they could buy a single family dwelling. Because of their warped or lack of worth, city planners now expect everyone to live in a Human Warehouse. Many cities now have a moratorium on SFHs.
I think there is something institutionally wrong with anyone under 62 that would intentionally desire to live in a multifamily building, to the point that they would buy or rent one, for more than they could buy a single family dwelling. Because of their warped or lack of worth, city planners now expect everyone to live in a Human Warehouse. Many cities now have a moratorium on SFHs.
Well there are reasons for it, the main one being single. Back in the hey days in SF you would rent a nice place at the waterfront with hot tub and pool, and you would not only be able to bang all the hot single and divorced girls in the same building, but also bring girls home from the neighborhood bars. Also having amenities such as pool and gym is huge in your younger years. Whereas if you move to the country side you will have a hard time fitting in as a single man/woman. You have to be ready to take the next step, either move in with your gf/wife or seriously shopping for one. There are few who enjoy that type of living even as singles, but I'd say that's a minority. So with the ever increasing single households I am not surprised people are paying an arm and a leg for rent in one of these "warehouses" while they could have a much nicer place in the coutryside for less while building equity.
Wonder if this is true or just more disinfo. No info on those people who lost their life insurance and medical insurance if they got jabbed. Blame the victim mode is on high. https://t.me/SGTnewsNetwork/35860
And....to add to the schizoid nature of the crumbling Covid narrative, British Parliament has decided to save their necks by declaring the vaccines safe and safe for all ages. "All the dead and mutilated fuckers don't count." https://t.me/BenjaminFulfordWDSGroup/79117
Wonder if this is true or just more disinfo. No info on those people who lost their life insurance and medical insurance if they got jabbed. Blame the victim mode is on high. https://t.me/SGTnewsNetwork/35860
Wonder if this is true or just more disinfo. No info on those people who lost their life insurance and medical insurance if they got jabbed. Blame the victim mode is on high. https://t.me/SGTnewsNetwork/35860
Well there are reasons for it, the main one being single. Back in the hey days in SF you would rent a nice place at the waterfront with hot tub and pool, and you would not only be able to bang all the hot single and divorced girls in the same building, but also bring girls home from the neighborhood bars
Yes I realize I'm painting with a broad stroke there. What puzzles me are the high end condo dwellings, that are just in the middle of some urban area, not on a water front. For that kind of money they could have bought a SFH in the suburbs, and not have to step out into homelessness, blight, and crime when they leave their home. There's people taking what ever they can get or afford, then there's people who actually seek that living arrangement out, but could afford a wider range of accommodations they wanted.
Little Twitter gush-o-rama. Doesn't it look like a Richey Rich version of Mom's basement in a high rise? Boy, those DARPA boys know how to treat spoiled whore brats.
« First « Previous Comments 19,026 - 19,065 of 42,183 Next » Last » Search these comments
I think there is something institutionally wrong with anyone under 62 that would intentionally desire to live in a multifamily building, to the point that they would buy or rent one, for more than they could buy a single family dwelling. Because of their warped or lack of worth, city planners now expect everyone to live in a Human Warehouse. Many cities now have a moratorium on SFHs.
Well there are reasons for it, the main one being single. Back in the hey days in SF you would rent a nice place at the waterfront with hot tub and pool, and you would not only be able to bang all the hot single and divorced girls in the same building, but also bring girls home from the neighborhood bars. Also having amenities such as pool and gym is huge in your younger years. Whereas if you move to the country side you will have a hard time fitting in as a single man/woman. You have to be ready to take the next step, either move in with your gf/wife or seriously shopping for one. There are few who enjoy that type of living even as singles, but I'd say that's a minority. So with the ever increasing single households I am not surprised people are paying an arm and a leg for rent in one of these "warehouses" while they could have a much nicer place in the coutryside for less while building equity.
https://t.me/SGTnewsNetwork/35860
https://t.me/BenjaminFulfordWDSGroup/79117
https://t.me/JovanHuttonPulitzer/7337
https://t.me/WeTheMedia/78373
You wonder? Seriously?
Fake news
Yes I realize I'm painting with a broad stroke there. What puzzles me are the high end condo dwellings, that are just in the middle of some urban area, not on a water front.
For that kind of money they could have bought a SFH in the suburbs, and not have to step out into homelessness, blight, and crime when they leave their home.
There's people taking what ever they can get or afford, then there's people who actually seek that living arrangement out, but could afford a wider range of accommodations they wanted.
No more true than Biden's claim that gas was $5/gallon when he took office. Germany would be more likely to stop the unjabbed from buying a car.
Ceffer says
Also likely false.
« First « Previous Comments 19,026 - 19,065 of 42,183 Next » Last » Search these comments