I agree. Please include a link back wherever possible.
Even on random hopeium bullshit gleaned from the dark web, meme-ified, and posted on the political humor thread? We already lost A'fuck, we can't afford to lose Ceffer.
I agree. Please include a link back wherever possible.
Even on random hopeium bullshit gleaned from the dark web, meme-ified, and posted on the political humor thread? We already lost A'fuck, we can't afford to lose Ceffer.
The whole point of the Internet is to point back to sources so people can verify them and falsification is difficult. That's the whole purpose of this design.
You know why "news" never makes use of hyperlinks to what they claim the Mueller Report says? It's because they are lying about it. They OFTEN cite sources, but it's a bitch to look it up, and then it's a bitch to see if it contains what they claim it contains, and you often find it doesn't. Media lies outright, all the fucking time. People do, propagandists sure as fuck do. I post on Bitchute fairly often, and people tell me to "look it up", and I give them a link, and tell them to do the same.
If people made it simple to see what they were saying was true, it more easily spreads. If I saw something that needs a lot of proof, I'll generally include links so that the person that is thinking "ah, he's got to be full of shit about THAT" - can see I'm not, and IF it gets passed on or somebody else reads it, they can more easily see, I am NOT lying. There's a war on with constant government propaganda, and no matter how bad you think it is, it's WAY worse than you think it is.
I can whip up some fake Twitter of Fuckerberg quotes, in no time at all. Anybody can - the problem is when it's passed on as true, and people just ASSUME it's true. People are conditioned to assume what they see is true. I want to see that habit broken, at least here. When my parents and friends sent me "articles" 15 years ago about something that supposedly happened, I would have to fucking research the damned thing every fucking time, and over 75% of the time it was wrong.
Wouldn't expect anything less from the Department of Selective Political Justice:
LINK? You have it RIGHT FUCKING THERE, but NOOOOOOOOOooo, you can't copy a fucking URL in your browser and send it, nooooo - make everybody fucking look it up for themselves. Make them waste a few minutes, you're time is SUPER FUCKING VALUABLE, AND SPENDING 1 SECOND IS JUST TOO MUCH OF FUCKING BURDEN.
The whole point of the Internet is to point back to sources so people can verify them and falsification is difficult. That's the whole purpose of this design.
I thought the internet was designed as an uninterruptable communication system in case of nuclear war? That and a place to share cat videos.
WEF Goebbels Memorial Lecture On Brutal Crushing Of Opposition Voices And Free Speech. Time to go full Nazi on alternative media. They wish to slaughter us with elan rather than being backed into their survival tunnels in Switzerland. It's nice to see they are at least worried enough to pose this.
Will go down in history as the most vile, corrupt and debased politician to hold the office. I'm glad I won't be seeing the bitch's body double or CGI any more. She's a Congressional shit stain.
If it's true, and I do not believe Michelle Obama is a dude,
He/She didn't tuck in his/her nuts. That is what I would look like if I was wearing a miniskirt and crossed my legs. Something you would not want to see in any context..
Photoshop is too easy. I can do this is GIMP which is the poor-mans' photo-shop. It's actually more powerful than photoshop, just WAY more difficult to use. You can do a lot more with it, but it's so fucking difficult and so many steps, in a way it's less powerful than Photoshop.
Photoshop is too easy. I can do this is GIMP which is the poor-mans' photo-shop.
That Michelle pic is obviously a "photoshopped" joke. I think I saw that meme with the real person's head still on it, and this is just a badly done insert of Michelle's head.
Photoshop is too easy. I can do this is GIMP which is the poor-mans' photo-shop.
That Michelle pic is obviously a "photoshopped" joke. I think I saw that meme with the real person's head still on it, and this is just a badly done insert of Michelle's head.
I would have taken Michelle Obama's entire body and added something somwhere.
Now that you mention it, that does look like a head photoshopped on another body. The hair is the most visible defect, but also the lighting. Anyhow, I don't believe that's a real nutsack if this was on television.
« First « Previous Comments 20,348 - 20,387 of 42,163 Next » Last » Search these comments
https://t.me/SGTnewsNetwork/39461
@Ceffer - please include links.
https://twitter.com/AZBrianAnderson/status/1609966745334460416?ref_src=patrick.net
https://t.me/WeTheMedia/82002
Holy shit, could be true:
https://www.cbsnews.com/miami/news/miami-dade-police-department-unveils-lgbtq-awareness-patrol-vehicle/
They should just come right out and admit that they are 100% supportive of pedophilia.
Well in their defense, it's a lot cheaper and safer to virtue signal than to actually do anything about crime.
I agree. Please include a link back wherever possible.
Even on random hopeium bullshit gleaned from the dark web, meme-ified, and posted on the political humor thread?
We already lost A'fuck, we can't afford to lose Ceffer.
The whole point of the Internet is to point back to sources so people can verify them and falsification is difficult. That's the whole purpose of this design.
You see, you can link everything
You know why "news" never makes use of hyperlinks to what they claim the Mueller Report says? It's because they are lying about it. They OFTEN cite sources, but it's a bitch to look it up, and then it's a bitch to see if it contains what they claim it contains, and you often find it doesn't. Media lies outright, all the fucking time. People do, propagandists sure as fuck do. I post on Bitchute fairly often, and people tell me to "look it up", and I give them a link, and tell them to do the same.
If people made it simple to see what they were saying was true, it more easily spreads. If I saw something that needs a lot of proof, I'll generally include links so that the person that is thinking "ah, he's got to be full of shit about THAT" - can see I'm not, and IF it gets passed on or somebody else reads it, they can more easily see, I am NOT lying. There's a war on with constant government propaganda, and no matter how bad you think it is, it's WAY worse than you think it is.
I can whip up some fake Twitter of Fuckerberg quotes, in no time at all. Anybody can - the problem is when it's passed on as true, and people just ASSUME it's true. People are conditioned to assume what they see is true. I want to see that habit broken, at least here. When my parents and friends sent me "articles" 15 years ago about something that supposedly happened, I would have to fucking research the damned thing every fucking time, and over 75% of the time it was wrong.
LINK? You have it RIGHT FUCKING THERE, but NOOOOOOOOOooo, you can't copy a fucking URL in your browser and send it, nooooo - make everybody fucking look it up for themselves. Make them waste a few minutes, you're time is SUPER FUCKING VALUABLE, AND SPENDING 1 SECOND IS JUST TOO MUCH OF FUCKING BURDEN.
I thought the internet was designed as an uninterruptable communication system in case of nuclear war? That and a place to share cat videos.
https://t.me/JustDudeChannel/27082
https://t.me/gatewaypunditofficial/23252
https://youtu.be/IL4wW4AoGOA
If it's true, and I do not believe Michelle Obama is a dude,
He/She didn't tuck in his/her nuts. That is what I would look like if I was wearing a miniskirt and crossed my legs. Something you would not want to see in any context..
Photoshop is too easy. I can do this is GIMP which is the poor-mans' photo-shop. It's actually more powerful than photoshop, just WAY more difficult to use. You can do a lot more with it, but it's so fucking difficult and so many steps, in a way it's less powerful than Photoshop.
That Michelle pic is obviously a "photoshopped" joke. I think I saw that meme with the real person's head still on it, and this is just a badly done insert of Michelle's head.
I would have taken Michelle Obama's entire body and added something somwhere.
Now that you mention it, that does look like a head photoshopped on another body. The hair is the most visible defect, but also the lighting. Anyhow, I don't believe that's a real nutsack if this was on television.
« First « Previous Comments 20,348 - 20,387 of 42,163 Next » Last » Search these comments