patrick.net

richwicks says

Did YOU reconstruct the data?

LMAO. You make wild speculation based on an emotional response to meager information and somehow I'm on the hook for disproving your claims? HAHAHAHA! No wonder you've got such a strong response to a logician, you're bogged down in pathological thought processes. I would recommend focusing on your work instead of spending hours getting lost trying to find a twitter post that literally no one asked you to do.

Red Cross is a spy militia posing as a charitable organization. They run drugs, weapons, soldiers, illicit organ traffic, cash for payoffs and kidnap children from disaster sites for trafficking..

https://t.me/SGTnewsNetwork/48529

DhammaStep says

LMAO. You make wild speculation based on an emotional response to meager information and somehow I'm on the hook for disproving your claims?

I hold the default position. You know where the burden of proof lies. You make a claim, you back it up. I will find out if Ethical Skeptic is lying or not. You'll just blindly believe him. That's the problem with our society. Rachael Maddow says that the vaccine is good, and if you take it, you will stop the virus from replicating, and it's entirely safe and totally effective, and since you are now immune you stop the pandemic.


original link

Why would she lie? You have to check data, and people have to PRODUCE data, otherwise it's just a cult of personality, which you've engaged in, because you don't verify claims. I do. I have to do that with every fucking person I depend on information from, except the rare exception, where they produce their sources. They're great.

Believing people blindly is stupid, and I know, how much bullshit there is. It's not left or right, it's everywhere. They don't care what you believe, as long as it's not the truth. That's what keeps the people fighting. Oh the left made a bullshit claim! SURE DID, but then the right makes a bullshit claim...

As long as nobody is right, there's no converts.

The Ethical Skeptic quoted by Ceffer says

"Those who have made arguments that Remdesivir was deadly, have a data to back up their contention as a hypothesis."

Yes, we have data proving that Remdesivir is deadly. And that is why this is a fact and not a hypothesis. Remdesivir is deadly, period.

Two allegedly fake avatars and Globo Homo PM? Rishi Sunak is allegedly in the office purely for the purpose of increasing his family's wealth as much as possible. Sounds like some of our Congress critters.


https://t.me/SGTnewsNetwork/48556

richwicks says

You'll just blindly believe him

You embarass yourself with condescension. You've made several wild claims with no evidence and claim to take the superior position. You've said he was wrong without even looking into it, which you admit. Why would anyone listen to you?

Klaus and Satan aren't going to be happy with this.

New Yorker turned into propaganda scrip sheet again. Mockingbird scrips for mental crips.

Shit, wasn't he just doing his job. If you did this to Congress you'd clear out two thirds of the place and ALL of the White House and ShadowFucks.

https://t.me/SGTnewsNetwork/48612

Trump cracks me up.

DhammaStep says

richwicks says

You'll just blindly believe him

You embarass yourself with condescension. You've made several wild claims with no evidence and claim to take the superior position.

Tell me, why do you believe him?

Did you know that Vaxxed, the film, was FILLED with bullshit? Stew Peters (Stewpiders) made that. Why do you think there was a bunch of completely incorrect claims in it, and it was promoted everywhere?

There were claiming there was a like a 60% birth rate decline in Australia - OBVIOUSLY false. How could they make a mistake that huge? You know what it was based on? They looked at incomplete data for 2023 and just ignored 7 months of data wasn't available. Alex Jones frequently makes similar "mistakes". There's a reason he's called a nut, he makes false claims all the time.

You want to hide a truth? Mix it liberally with a bunch of lies. You purposely use a known dishonest person, to push the truth, and then you make it FUCKING HARD to verify anything they say. What's the point of reporting anything then if they are entirely careless about being correct?

Alex Jones has said truthful things before, but he's said a lot of bullshit as well. Why do you think he's completely unconcerned about spreading bullshit? Stew Peters does as well. There's people that are just entirely full of shit, Jim Willie, Benjamin Fulford.

But people who go through effort to be correct, you haven't heard of them.

richwicks says

Tell me, why do you believe him?

Why do you believe you deserve a dialogue now? You haven't acknowledged that I found that twitter post effortlessly with only five pieces of data. You haven't acknowledged that you made a claim that something is misinformation without actually looking at it. You've only backpedalled or deflected when called out on it. There's only one person you believe: yourself, even when you've no reason to. There's just as much value speaking to you as there is a politician.

Edit: on top of all of that, you put beliefs in my mouth and strawman me because everyone but you is too stupid to think for themselves.

DhammaStep says

richwicks says

Tell me, why do you believe him?

Why do you believe you deserve a dialogue now?

You didn't answer my question.

You don't want a dialogue because you realize I'm correct. You believe him simply because it enforces your current beliefs. I know that's tempting, but I've been burned by that BADLY.

I will spend the necessary time to reconstruct the graph based on available information, but not today.

DhammaStep says

You haven't acknowledged that you made a claim that something is misinformation without actually looking at it.

It takes hours to confirm what he claimed. He could have trivialized this, and didn't.

Why? Maybe he's just s shitty researcher, that's possible.

What is so fucking hard about including sources? Links? Nothing, but nobody will do it, so any information is reduced to rumor. Just fucking stupid.

richwicks says

You didn't answer my question

Prime narcissism. Your claims and questions must be answered but mine must be ignored. Good luck with the data. I'm sure data is analysis is absolutely simple!

richwicks says

You don't want a dialogue because you realize I'm correct

HAHAHAHAHAHA. You're right! I don't want to talk to you because you're so right about everything! It's not that you see everything black and white like a teenager that makes immediate judgements without data to back it up then demands everyone else be held to a higher standard. lmao

DhammaStep says

Prime narcissism. Your claims and questions must be answered but mine must be ignored

What is so hard about including sources to claims?

I know why you would avoid this. You're lying or spreading incorrect information.

You would ALWAYS omit data if you were lying. After 30 years of having hyperlinks, the only reason you wouldn't include source material, is you don't have discernment. You don't care about being unassailable in your conclusion.

https://patrick.net/post/1343769/2022-02-24-greeted-like-liberators-ukraine?start=1123#comment-1853120

I'm a little different, and in a day or two, I'll demonstrate with "Ethical" Skeptic. IF I don't find an error in his graph, I'll start looking for errors in other posts. If I cannot find any after 6 or so, I'll consider him relatively reliable.

richwicks says

What is so hard about including sources to claims?

I know why you would avoid this. You're lying or spreading incorrect information.

Do you literally have no idea you're the one that made a speculative claim without sources? Are you okay, man? Like... ES puts his sources on the graphs, he's not hiding anything. He's not the one making the screencaps. I'm not the one posting the screencaps either, why am I beholden to this? You spent hours of your life getting mad about search engines and image quality while making wild claims based on your emotional response to the word "intelligence." Man.. go take a vacation.

DhammaStep says

HAHAHAHAHAHA. You're right! I don't want to talk to you because you're so right about everything!

I don't know if I'm correct. I'm asking you why you think "Ethical" Skeptic is correct. I always, always, always, check claims before I trust people.

DhammaStep says

It's not that you see everything black and white like a teenager that makes immediate judgements without data to back it up then demands everyone else be held to a higher standard.

True and false are black and white. It's binary.

It's not a higher standard, it's just a fucking easy to implement standard.

It's easy for me to claim "Ukraine was overthrown by the United States", but how did I come to that conclusion?

https://patrick.net/post/1343769/2022-02-24-greeted-like-liberators-ukraine?start=1123#comment-1853120

I've explained it there. I can write it out again, as I know it practically by heart now. Victoria Nuland had a phone call with Geoffrey Pyatt where she was picking out the government of Ukraine. The phone call was released on youtube on Feb 4, 2014:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MSxaa-67yGM

She decided that Arseniy Yatseniuk would take control of the government.

The problem is that the current president Viktor Yanukovych didn't leave power until Feb 22, 2014:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viktor_Yanukovych

Leonid Kuchma abandoned office on Feb 5, 2014. That was a day before the phone call was released.

This is why I believe what I believe. It's not irrational, it's not because somebody "told me", it's because I've checked and MAYBE I'm wrong, but nobody will explain it to me. @"Mostly Reader" tried to bully me into accepting I was wrong, but never bothered to explain how I was wrong. He couldn't explain why I was wrong, and I believe that's most likely because I'm NOT wrong.

@DhammaStep - I'm incorrect - it wasn't the documentary Vaxxed that is bullshit, it's "Died Suddenly".


original link

You want to start about 37 minutes in, before that it's just them shooting the shit.

The_Deplorable says

Remdesivir is deadly, period

And the manufacturer knew that before they ever released it. Link in the RFK book.

Nurses in the covid ward called it "run death is near".

Chinese Intel has stated that they estimate the life expectancy of their bribed puppet in office at 90 to 120 days, and that was almost a month ago. That means the Biden Actor stable might be genuinely concerned that their acting gig, and possibly their lives, are up. The typical mob retirement plan is death, don't want those actor birds singing. Maybe that's why the Biden Actor shown in Britain with Pedo Charles is so upset looking.

https://t.me/WeTheMedia/89274

AI bot headlines. Bots and fake identities are still VERY active on Twitter. Pics and vids of recent floods in NY State gave the usual yammering bot identities stating fossil fuels should be given up, floods are sign of impending doom with Global Warming yada yada yada.

More bot AI tags.

Continuing the 'senility myth' of the rubber masked Biden Actor. Their punctuated thespian senility does not even vaguely resemble real life senility. Whatever soap opera they show, you are programmed to see, so believe the movie if you must.

https://t.me/BenjaminFulfordWDSGroup/111757

"You try wearing this scratchy mask shit and spending hours every morning being dressed in that fucking CIA makeup wagon! You'd be touchy, too!"

https://t.me/gatewaypunditofficial/32487