Political Humor Thread
invite response
2019 Feb 17, 4:30pm 3,154,433 views 42,332 comments
by Patrick ➕follow (59) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 26,202 - 26,241 of 42,332 Next » Last » Search these comments
26202
Ceffer
2023 Jul 10, 4:36pm
Ceffer
2023 Jul 10, 4:36pm
New Yorker turned into propaganda scrip sheet again. Mockingbird scrips for mental crips.
26203
Ceffer
2023 Jul 10, 4:39pm
Ceffer
2023 Jul 10, 4:39pm
Shit, wasn't he just doing his job. If you did this to Congress you'd clear out two thirds of the place and ALL of the White House and ShadowFucks.
https://t.me/SGTnewsNetwork/48612
https://t.me/SGTnewsNetwork/48612
26205
richwicks
2023 Jul 10, 4:47pm
richwicks
2023 Jul 10, 4:47pm
DhammaStep says
Tell me, why do you believe him?
Did you know that Vaxxed, the film, was FILLED with bullshit? Stew Peters (Stewpiders) made that. Why do you think there was a bunch of completely incorrect claims in it, and it was promoted everywhere?
There were claiming there was a like a 60% birth rate decline in Australia - OBVIOUSLY false. How could they make a mistake that huge? You know what it was based on? They looked at incomplete data for 2023 and just ignored 7 months of data wasn't available. Alex Jones frequently makes similar "mistakes". There's a reason he's called a nut, he makes false claims all the time.
You want to hide a truth? Mix it liberally with a bunch of lies. You purposely use a known dishonest person, to push the truth, and then you make it FUCKING HARD to verify anything they say. What's the point of reporting anything then if they are entirely careless about being correct?
Alex Jones has said truthful things before, but he's said a lot of bullshit as well. Why do you think he's completely unconcerned about spreading bullshit? Stew Peters does as well. There's people that are just entirely full of shit, Jim Willie, Benjamin Fulford.
But people who go through effort to be correct, you haven't heard of them.
richwicks says
You'll just blindly believe him
You embarass yourself with condescension. You've made several wild claims with no evidence and claim to take the superior position.
Tell me, why do you believe him?
Did you know that Vaxxed, the film, was FILLED with bullshit? Stew Peters (Stewpiders) made that. Why do you think there was a bunch of completely incorrect claims in it, and it was promoted everywhere?
There were claiming there was a like a 60% birth rate decline in Australia - OBVIOUSLY false. How could they make a mistake that huge? You know what it was based on? They looked at incomplete data for 2023 and just ignored 7 months of data wasn't available. Alex Jones frequently makes similar "mistakes". There's a reason he's called a nut, he makes false claims all the time.
You want to hide a truth? Mix it liberally with a bunch of lies. You purposely use a known dishonest person, to push the truth, and then you make it FUCKING HARD to verify anything they say. What's the point of reporting anything then if they are entirely careless about being correct?
Alex Jones has said truthful things before, but he's said a lot of bullshit as well. Why do you think he's completely unconcerned about spreading bullshit? Stew Peters does as well. There's people that are just entirely full of shit, Jim Willie, Benjamin Fulford.
But people who go through effort to be correct, you haven't heard of them.
26206
DhammaStep
2023 Jul 10, 4:59pm
richwicks says
Why do you believe you deserve a dialogue now? You haven't acknowledged that I found that twitter post effortlessly with only five pieces of data. You haven't acknowledged that you made a claim that something is misinformation without actually looking at it. You've only backpedalled or deflected when called out on it. There's only one person you believe: yourself, even when you've no reason to. There's just as much value speaking to you as there is a politician.
Edit: on top of all of that, you put beliefs in my mouth and strawman me because everyone but you is too stupid to think for themselves.
Tell me, why do you believe him?
Why do you believe you deserve a dialogue now? You haven't acknowledged that I found that twitter post effortlessly with only five pieces of data. You haven't acknowledged that you made a claim that something is misinformation without actually looking at it. You've only backpedalled or deflected when called out on it. There's only one person you believe: yourself, even when you've no reason to. There's just as much value speaking to you as there is a politician.
Edit: on top of all of that, you put beliefs in my mouth and strawman me because everyone but you is too stupid to think for themselves.
26207
richwicks
2023 Jul 10, 5:06pm
richwicks
2023 Jul 10, 5:06pm
DhammaStep says
You didn't answer my question.
You don't want a dialogue because you realize I'm correct. You believe him simply because it enforces your current beliefs. I know that's tempting, but I've been burned by that BADLY.
I will spend the necessary time to reconstruct the graph based on available information, but not today.
DhammaStep says
It takes hours to confirm what he claimed. He could have trivialized this, and didn't.
Why? Maybe he's just s shitty researcher, that's possible.
What is so fucking hard about including sources? Links? Nothing, but nobody will do it, so any information is reduced to rumor. Just fucking stupid.
richwicks says
Tell me, why do you believe him?
Why do you believe you deserve a dialogue now?
You didn't answer my question.
You don't want a dialogue because you realize I'm correct. You believe him simply because it enforces your current beliefs. I know that's tempting, but I've been burned by that BADLY.
I will spend the necessary time to reconstruct the graph based on available information, but not today.
DhammaStep says
You haven't acknowledged that you made a claim that something is misinformation without actually looking at it.
It takes hours to confirm what he claimed. He could have trivialized this, and didn't.
Why? Maybe he's just s shitty researcher, that's possible.
What is so fucking hard about including sources? Links? Nothing, but nobody will do it, so any information is reduced to rumor. Just fucking stupid.
26208
DhammaStep
2023 Jul 10, 5:07pm
richwicks says
Prime narcissism. Your claims and questions must be answered but mine must be ignored. Good luck with the data. I'm sure data is analysis is absolutely simple!
You didn't answer my question
Prime narcissism. Your claims and questions must be answered but mine must be ignored. Good luck with the data. I'm sure data is analysis is absolutely simple!
26209
DhammaStep
2023 Jul 10, 5:13pm
richwicks says
HAHAHAHAHAHA. You're right! I don't want to talk to you because you're so right about everything! It's not that you see everything black and white like a teenager that makes immediate judgements without data to back it up then demands everyone else be held to a higher standard. lmao
You don't want a dialogue because you realize I'm correct
HAHAHAHAHAHA. You're right! I don't want to talk to you because you're so right about everything! It's not that you see everything black and white like a teenager that makes immediate judgements without data to back it up then demands everyone else be held to a higher standard. lmao
26210
richwicks
2023 Jul 10, 5:13pm
richwicks
2023 Jul 10, 5:13pm
DhammaStep says
What is so hard about including sources to claims?
I know why you would avoid this. You're lying or spreading incorrect information.
You would ALWAYS omit data if you were lying. After 30 years of having hyperlinks, the only reason you wouldn't include source material, is you don't have discernment. You don't care about being unassailable in your conclusion.
https://patrick.net/post/1343769/2022-02-24-greeted-like-liberators-ukraine?start=1123#comment-1853120
I'm a little different, and in a day or two, I'll demonstrate with "Ethical" Skeptic. IF I don't find an error in his graph, I'll start looking for errors in other posts. If I cannot find any after 6 or so, I'll consider him relatively reliable.
Prime narcissism. Your claims and questions must be answered but mine must be ignored
What is so hard about including sources to claims?
I know why you would avoid this. You're lying or spreading incorrect information.
You would ALWAYS omit data if you were lying. After 30 years of having hyperlinks, the only reason you wouldn't include source material, is you don't have discernment. You don't care about being unassailable in your conclusion.
https://patrick.net/post/1343769/2022-02-24-greeted-like-liberators-ukraine?start=1123#comment-1853120
I'm a little different, and in a day or two, I'll demonstrate with "Ethical" Skeptic. IF I don't find an error in his graph, I'll start looking for errors in other posts. If I cannot find any after 6 or so, I'll consider him relatively reliable.
26211
DhammaStep
2023 Jul 10, 5:15pm
richwicks says
Do you literally have no idea you're the one that made a speculative claim without sources? Are you okay, man? Like... ES puts his sources on the graphs, he's not hiding anything. He's not the one making the screencaps. I'm not the one posting the screencaps either, why am I beholden to this? You spent hours of your life getting mad about search engines and image quality while making wild claims based on your emotional response to the word "intelligence." Man.. go take a vacation.
What is so hard about including sources to claims?
I know why you would avoid this. You're lying or spreading incorrect information.
Do you literally have no idea you're the one that made a speculative claim without sources? Are you okay, man? Like... ES puts his sources on the graphs, he's not hiding anything. He's not the one making the screencaps. I'm not the one posting the screencaps either, why am I beholden to this? You spent hours of your life getting mad about search engines and image quality while making wild claims based on your emotional response to the word "intelligence." Man.. go take a vacation.
26212
richwicks
2023 Jul 10, 5:21pm
richwicks
2023 Jul 10, 5:21pm
DhammaStep says
I don't know if I'm correct. I'm asking you why you think "Ethical" Skeptic is correct. I always, always, always, check claims before I trust people.
DhammaStep says
True and false are black and white. It's binary.
It's not a higher standard, it's just a fucking easy to implement standard.
It's easy for me to claim "Ukraine was overthrown by the United States", but how did I come to that conclusion?
https://patrick.net/post/1343769/2022-02-24-greeted-like-liberators-ukraine?start=1123#comment-1853120
I've explained it there. I can write it out again, as I know it practically by heart now. Victoria Nuland had a phone call with Geoffrey Pyatt where she was picking out the government of Ukraine. The phone call was released on youtube on Feb 4, 2014:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MSxaa-67yGM
She decided that Arseniy Yatseniuk would take control of the government.
The problem is that the current president Viktor Yanukovych didn't leave power until Feb 22, 2014:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viktor_Yanukovych
Leonid Kuchma abandoned office on Feb 5, 2014. That was a day before the phone call was released.
This is why I believe what I believe. It's not irrational, it's not because somebody "told me", it's because I've checked and MAYBE I'm wrong, but nobody will explain it to me. @"Mostly Reader" tried to bully me into accepting I was wrong, but never bothered to explain how I was wrong. He couldn't explain why I was wrong, and I believe that's most likely because I'm NOT wrong.
HAHAHAHAHAHA. You're right! I don't want to talk to you because you're so right about everything!
I don't know if I'm correct. I'm asking you why you think "Ethical" Skeptic is correct. I always, always, always, check claims before I trust people.
DhammaStep says
It's not that you see everything black and white like a teenager that makes immediate judgements without data to back it up then demands everyone else be held to a higher standard.
True and false are black and white. It's binary.
It's not a higher standard, it's just a fucking easy to implement standard.
It's easy for me to claim "Ukraine was overthrown by the United States", but how did I come to that conclusion?
https://patrick.net/post/1343769/2022-02-24-greeted-like-liberators-ukraine?start=1123#comment-1853120
I've explained it there. I can write it out again, as I know it practically by heart now. Victoria Nuland had a phone call with Geoffrey Pyatt where she was picking out the government of Ukraine. The phone call was released on youtube on Feb 4, 2014:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MSxaa-67yGM
She decided that Arseniy Yatseniuk would take control of the government.
The problem is that the current president Viktor Yanukovych didn't leave power until Feb 22, 2014:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viktor_Yanukovych
Leonid Kuchma abandoned office on Feb 5, 2014. That was a day before the phone call was released.
This is why I believe what I believe. It's not irrational, it's not because somebody "told me", it's because I've checked and MAYBE I'm wrong, but nobody will explain it to me. @"Mostly Reader" tried to bully me into accepting I was wrong, but never bothered to explain how I was wrong. He couldn't explain why I was wrong, and I believe that's most likely because I'm NOT wrong.
26213
richwicks
2023 Jul 10, 5:26pm
richwicks
2023 Jul 10, 5:26pm
@DhammaStep - I'm incorrect - it wasn't the documentary Vaxxed that is bullshit, it's "Died Suddenly".
original link
You want to start about 37 minutes in, before that it's just them shooting the shit.
original link
You want to start about 37 minutes in, before that it's just them shooting the shit.
26214
Onvacation
2023 Jul 10, 6:33pm
Onvacation
2023 Jul 10, 6:33pm
The_Deplorable says
And the manufacturer knew that before they ever released it. Link in the RFK book.
Nurses in the covid ward called it "run death is near".
Remdesivir is deadly, period
And the manufacturer knew that before they ever released it. Link in the RFK book.
Nurses in the covid ward called it "run death is near".
26216
Ceffer
2023 Jul 10, 11:20pm
Ceffer
2023 Jul 10, 11:20pm
Chinese Intel has stated that they estimate the life expectancy of their bribed puppet in office at 90 to 120 days, and that was almost a month ago. That means the Biden Actor stable might be genuinely concerned that their acting gig, and possibly their lives, are up. The typical mob retirement plan is death, don't want those actor birds singing. Maybe that's why the Biden Actor shown in Britain with Pedo Charles is so upset looking.
https://t.me/WeTheMedia/89274
https://t.me/WeTheMedia/89274
26217
Ceffer
2023 Jul 10, 11:22pm
Ceffer
2023 Jul 10, 11:22pm
AI bot headlines. Bots and fake identities are still VERY active on Twitter. Pics and vids of recent floods in NY State gave the usual yammering bot identities stating fossil fuels should be given up, floods are sign of impending doom with Global Warming yada yada yada.
26228
Ceffer
2023 Jul 11, 9:44am
Ceffer
2023 Jul 11, 9:44am
Continuing the 'senility myth' of the rubber masked Biden Actor. Their punctuated thespian senility does not even vaguely resemble real life senility. Whatever soap opera they show, you are programmed to see, so believe the movie if you must.
https://t.me/BenjaminFulfordWDSGroup/111757
https://t.me/BenjaminFulfordWDSGroup/111757
26234
Ceffer
2023 Jul 11, 10:08am
Ceffer
2023 Jul 11, 10:08am
"You try wearing this scratchy mask shit and spending hours every morning being dressed in that fucking CIA makeup wagon! You'd be touchy, too!"
https://t.me/gatewaypunditofficial/32487
https://t.me/gatewaypunditofficial/32487
26236
Ceffer
2023 Jul 11, 10:19am
Ceffer
2023 Jul 11, 10:19am
Nice roundup of the various Biden Actors over the last coupla coupla. How do we attach the ear? Let me count the ways. Looks like they are putting him in his 'King Lear' stage for the final curtain call.
« First « Previous Comments 26,202 - 26,241 of 42,332 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,261,697 comments by 15,065 users - REpro online now