patrick.net

Brought to you by a coalition of progressives too far left for the Democrat party to embrace.
Talking points include just enough popular opinions to resonate and keep people listening. Her backers are seriously questionable, though. She strikes me as a front woman for the actual organization, not the brains or the leadership. Playing the Mockingjay once again...

Bloomberg?

This is how I like Jennifer Lawrence ...

When she says politics, she means Weinstein spooj.

Why don't Pelosi get her in front of Congress and demand to see the evidence? All of it.

She helped break it along with her career. She was part of the Celebrity Brown Shirt recruitment class.

Fuck Her, the only thing I want to see from here is More Crying over not being able to get a job for even a Condom Commercial.

I don't know. I feel safer with the plutocrats in charge.

They'll protect our right to keep our guns, and they will manipulate us with a daily dose of hate and fear (my favorites).

What's not to like ?

Tenpoundbass says

More Crying

Yeah she's in trouble. Only 24 million in 2018. Her worst year in at least 5 years.

I stopped watching when "Josh" showed up. Surprisingly interesting up until then.

Fascinating to watch: not a single comment on the actual points made in the video.

Conservatives can't repress the impulse to immediately shoot the messengeress. 100% ad hominem , 0% substance.

It's always the same: Pelosi, AOC, Hillary, Warren, Al Gore..... BANG BANG BANG BANG BANG....

The same on the left with TTTTRRRrrrrrUUMMMpppp....

It's all sectarian, group think, tribal, easily manipulated empty guff.

Heraclitusstudent says

Fascinating to watch: not a single comment on the actual points made in the video.

The message in the video wasnt bad, but it was void of anything tangible. There is nothing in the video worthy of criticism.

TBF, a known-TDS-sufferer-half-wit-piece-of-ass suggesting all americans can come together, is a nice sentiment. Certainly preferable as compared to her past political commentary

Anti-corruption is in the eyes of the beholder. All a 'so called anti corruption' law would do would place another tool of selective enforcement in the hands of those in power. We already see this in the LibbyFuck exonerations of all Dems and their atrocities, and the clown act legal persecution of a sitting President. We also see it in the CIA based exonerations of the Bush criminal syndicate. Might is right. We see the tip of the corruption iceberg with mostly after the fact insights into the actual machinery. The most corrupt are the biggest virtue signalers. Virtue signaling is an earmark of corruption, because it is a diversion while the actions and actors of corruption go unhindered.

Money will always find a way to flow to crooked pols for quid pro quo. Unfortunately, people in general WANT corruption, as long as they determine that it favors their views and their interests. Most voters are too stupid or uninvolved to even understand substantive issues. There are already piles of laws in place that are simply ignored, or used only as vehicles of convenience to attack enemies. There is no such thing as uniform, even application.

Nobody with half a brain believes that the legal system is impartial, or would impartially administer any anti-corruption law, however idealistically framed. Writing on paper alone does not cure a system. That's where Jennifer Naif departs from reality into the voids of unworkable idealism.

APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch says

You cunts want to end corruption?

Appoint me chief of examinations at Comptroller of Currency.

The fucking breathtaking screams and shrieks of the dying and dismembered, the entreaties for a quick end will assure you AMERICA! is again safe from bankster cunts.

This is true, but you will have to ride in with Jennifer stuck to your face, legs wrapped around your neck, begging for the sanctifying balm after the satisfactions of slaughter.

Rin says

This is how I like Jennifer Lawrence ...

I like my women clean shavened.