patrick.net

I'll vote for Dems across the ticket until Trump and his lickspittle sycophants are removed from office

but that is at the expense of the country's security

I also have inlaws and other relatives that literally depend on social security working. So, it's a wash.

Burisma hired the Biden in attempt to get some insights into the administration and to hopefully buy a little access (face time) and to hopefully get the benefit of the doubt.

I don't know about you, but I'd just assume not be living in a country where 1/3 of the seniors are destitute and I have to either watch my inlaws go hungry or subsidize their food and shelter.

I wasn't a deficit scold right after the last recession, but running a $1 trillion deficit at the end of a very long expansion is economic malpractice. It makes us all less secure. It increases the likelyhood of disaster during the next recession and decreases the ability of our government to provide services like defense and retirement.

The fact that you assume the worst with Biden and ignore conflicts of interest in the Trump administration would be baffling if right wing radio and tv programming did not exist.

Hopefully, it won't be Biden on the ticket,

Burisma hired the Biden in attempt to get some insights into the administration and to hopefully buy a little access

What country are you talking about? If that's the trajectory of your family, they should have saved more. SS was not meant as the end all retirement account for Americans. I expect nothing from SS. Your family members and inlaws planned extremely poorly if they're hungry with no housing. It sucks, but it's not my problem. I will do everything I can to not pay more in taxes because others were lazy or didn't have insurance for hard times. Also, when did social security payments stop being made? That's news to me.

Uh...what? Joe Biden confused his wife for his sister while giving his victory speech on stage...

I'm embarrassed for the people who Judy voted for him... 🤦‍♀️ #WalkAwayFromDemocrats #VoteRedToSaveAmerica2020pic.twitter.com/m1qPDFKpcO— Catt (@CattHarmony) March 4, 2020

But this flash coronation wasn't because Biden convinced his competitors that he had the best policies or the best temperament to take on Donald Trump. There is one reason and one reason alone the establishment has rallied around Biden: He is not Bernie Sanders.

The argument coming from the establishment is all about electability and uniting the party. "We need somebody who can beat Donald Trump," said O'Rourke in his speech endorsing Biden. "If we spend the next four months dividing our party, we will spend the next four years watching Donald Trump tear apart this country," said Klobuchar in her speech. Democratic voters who are understandably terrified of a Trump second term apparently listened.

In reality, propping up Biden was a desperate reaction to the momentum Sanders had after winning the popular vote in each of the first three primary states. It is guaranteed to drag out the primary as long as possible, and creates a distinct risk of a brokered convention that will create a lot of bitterness and make beating Trump more difficult. Before the establishment rallied around Biden, his campaign was on the verge of collapse. He had been crushed in the first three states, he had little money or campaign organization, and was polling far behind Sanders in most of the Super Tuesday states.

Now it is basically an even race. While Sanders lost in the South Tuesday, he also won Utah, Colorado, Vermont, and probably California (it will take days for the votes to be counted there). With approximately two thirds of delegates yet to be awarded, it will likely be a grueling race that will go on until the convention.

Electability is the only argument that has even a fig leaf of plausibility, so it's what the establishment goes with. But it's not remotely the case that Biden is a sure thing while Sanders is a terrible gamble. Sanders, it's true, would be the most left-wing president in history, and openly identifies as a socialist — something a majority of Americans say they dislike. But it's also true that Sanders has been tarred as a socialist for years now and still consistently polls well ahead of Trump, and about as well as Biden. He also has an army of dedicated activists, and by far the strongest fundraising machine in the party (outside of oligarchs like Mike Bloomberg who can casually spend a half-billion dollars of their own money).

Biden also has particular risks that are not easily quantifiable but still obvious. He has run a horrible, lazy campaign — indeed, even Clyburn said as much while endorsing him. He had basically no ground game in any of the Super Tuesday states. He has a long history of being creepy with women. And let's be frank: Biden is clearly suffering some kind of cognitive decline. He performed horribly in almost all of the debates, frequently rambling off on bizarre tangents. He opened his speech Tuesday night by mixing up his wife and his sister. He also has a habit of making up fake stories — like that he was involved in civil rights protests, or that a general asked him to honor a brave soldier, or most recently, he was arrested in South Africa trying to visit Nelson Mandela. None of these things happened.

Biden's appalling record is also utterly at odds with the modern Democratic Party's branding. He voted for the Iraq War, and defended that vote for months afterwards. He was a key architect of the bankruptcy bill that made it impossible to get rid of student loan debt, and various crime and war on drugs bills that threw millions of Americans in prison. He tried repeatedly to cut Social Security and Medicare, and voted for multiple rounds of financial deregulation. (That is just scratching the surface.)

Conversely, going with a moderate like Biden risks deflating the activist energy that has built up around Sanders and Elizabeth Warren. The younger voters that Sanders is winning by huge margins in most states may figure the fix is in and decide not to vote in November.

In short, Joe Biden could very easily lose to Trump. Unlike Obama, he is not some once-in-a-generation political talent. He is a fading, washed-up operator with decades of baggage who has lost a step or three. Nominating him would be a terrific gamble — and given his record and staffing choices (one of his top policy advisers is the architect of the disastrous 1996 welfare reform), a gamble with very little upside.

:
The desperation is kicking in already.

BDS so soon ?

Yet, Creepy Uncle Joe is the one identified in polls most able to beat Trump.

If Biden wins, then I guarantee you the border will be the first major policy he will address as President.


The border will be second. The first thing hill will do is cover up all the deep states crimes with the fake dossier, etc.

Dark horse though (no pun intended, I think...) Barack Obama? Not sure if that's even possible though.

My guess is that he will pick Klobuchar as VP. She's a mid-westerner, a woman, and pulled out of the race before super-Tuesday, and gave her support to Biden.

You're thinking about the wrong man. It will be Obama, allright, but not Barak. It will be Michelle.