patrick.net

https://gab.com/QuinnTheEskimoPro/posts/112389101476576074

Patrick says

https://gab.com/QuinnTheEskimoPro/posts/112389101476576074

They did a documentary on this and then never released it.


original link


A copy of the film was kept by somebody and released years later.

I think the answer lies right in front of us all. The trump DOJ was in charge, and must take the blame and accountability on how a high profile detainee, on suicide watch, got dead. Easy peasy.

https://apnews.com/article/jeffrey-epstein-suicide-department-of-justice-investigation-50c229b7953096f0301bfa1e7f0b7703

richwicks says

Patrick says

https://gab.com/QuinnTheEskimoPro/posts/112389101476576074

They did a documentary on this and then never released it.

original link

A copy of the film was kept by somebody and released years later.

The call-boy scandal was touched on in the Franklin Cover-Up. And really it was an attempt to sweep the real story under the rug. The funding for the Contras being built on child pedophile rings, drug running, and satanism. Standard deep state...

https://nypost.com/2024/07/01/us-news/florida-prosecutors-knew-epstein-raped-teenage-girls-2-years-before-cutting-deal-transcript-shows/

One has to wonder how many Florida prosecutors themselves visited Epstein's island.

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/divided-house-wednesday-july-3-2024

Monday, PBS —PBS!— ran a story headlined, “Newly released Epstein transcripts: Florida prosecutors knew billionaire raped teen girls years before cutting deal.” It should have said, “Federal prosecutors knew.” But otherwise, it reported the story straight.

Florida Circuit Judge Luis Delgado’s release on Monday of about 200 new pages from the Epstein Grand Jury transcript surprised everyone, since the judge had scheduled a hearing for next week on when and how to release them, and the bookies were giving 7-1 betting odds on whether the judge would survive to hold the hearing.

But the bill Governor DeSantis signed in February allowed the release on Monday, or any time thereafter, and the judge apparently, for some reason, decided to go early. Probably good thinking.

Judge Delgado was not amused by what he’d seen. Delgado wrote, “The details in the record will be outrageous to decent people,” meaning everyone except many people who are in a political party that starts with the same letter as Donald. The judge pointedly continued, “The testimony taken by the Grand Jury concerns activity ranging from grossly unacceptable to rape — all of the conduct at issue is sexually deviant, disgusting, and criminal.”

In my view, there’s much too little calling out of disgusting sexual deviance these days. Just saying. But I digress.

In the order, Delago properly called Epstein “the most infamous pedophile in American history.” He wrote, “For almost 20 years, the story of how Jeffrey Epstein victimized some of Palm Beach County’s most vulnerable has been the subject of much anger and has at times diminished the public’s perception of the criminal justice system.” Not to quibble, but it’s diminished our perception of the criminal justice system more often that just “at times.” Other than that, I agree.

The new documents related to Epstein’s wrist-slapping 2008 plea deal. The transcripts from his Grand Jury indictment show that the jury heard testimony from victims that Epstein, who was then in his 40s, had raped teenage girls as young as 14 at his Palm Beach mansion. The teenagers testified that Epstein also paid them to find him more girls.

“The younger, the better,” Epstein told them.

In 2019, the Daily Beast ran a story about the sweet deal Federal prosecutors gave Epstein at the time. Former prosecutor Alexander Acosta approved the pathetic plea deal in 2008 that completely immunized Epstein, in exchange for just a year of house arrest. In 2019, when Acosta was applying to be Secretary of Labor, he was asked whether the Epstein deal would pose a problem for his confirmation. Acosta answered no, because Epstein belonged to intelligence:

"Is the Epstein case going to cause a problem [for confirmation hearings]?" Acosta had been asked. Acosta had explained, breezily, apparently, that back in the day he'd had just one meeting on the Epstein case. He'd cut the non-prosecution deal with one of Epstein's attorneys because he had "been told" to back off, that Epstein was above his pay grade. 'I was told Epstein belonged to intelligence' and to leave it alone," he told his interviewers in the Trump transition, who evidently thought that was a sufficient answer and went ahead and hired Acosta. (The Labor Department had no comment when asked about this.)

Because of that non-prosecution deal, because Epstein belonged to intelligence, Epstein would go on to continue his pedophilic crime spree and massive blackmail operation for twenty more years. Nobody has ever forced Acosta to explain his comment or say who told him that. No so far, at least.

Here is a link to Judge Delgado’s order with the newly-released documents attached. Obviously, it includes some very adult material. On an aside, the order suggested that Judge Delgado is not super convinced that Epstein is actually dead:

The Court finds Epstein is also widely reported to have been deceased since August 10,
2019, under controversial and "newsworthy" circumstances, while under "supervision" at
Metropolitan Correctional Center in the state of New York. This adds to the public interest.

As the judge noted, the new pages included no new names, no magic bullets. But they did show the scope of what Assistant US Attorney Acosta knew when he signed the plea deal, and how he stage-managed the Grand Jury to help get Epstein off the hook. Thanks to these new pages, the government is losing its ability to obfuscate about Epstein’s connections to intelligence, and the reasons why he got such a sweetheart deal.

It raises questions that demand answers. Alex Acosta should be testifying before Congress. Our real limit is how many un-blackmailed Congressmen there are. It’s not “the” Epstein disclosure we’ve long hoped for. But this is nevertheless remarkable progress. One of these days, we’re going to get the answers. And there will be a reckoning.

Bless Judge Delgado. And bless Governor DeSantis for passing the law requiring publication of the Grand Jury transcript and its exhibits.

https://tuckercarlson.com/tucker-show-mike-cernovich

Lots of good details about the Epstein mop-up operation to hide all the info and then kill Epstein.

All of the politicians, celebrities and Royals probably called the CIA/Mossad/MI6 and demanded to know the location of the new honey traps so they could get their rocks off some more. After all, a little embarrassment but no prosecution at all is scarcely an inhibition.

Dead or imprisoned pimps and madams is just the hazards of the peasant pretenders.

Maybe posted before, but so good.

What happened to @Willpowers ?

Patrick says

Score so far:

Bill Gates: 36
Bill Clinton: 27

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/duck-duck-goose-wednesday-september

As for the Epstein List, who knows. I’m not getting my hopes up.

But Trump is going to lose votes if he keeps talking this way. It’s a good bet that, if Bill Gates hears about this, he won’t vote for Donald Trump in November. And don’t forget Magistrate Bruce Reinhart, who made history by signing off on the FBI’s warrant to raid Mar-a-Lago, the first police raid of a presidential home ever. Here’s the good magistrate:




Before becoming a federal magistrate, Reinhart quit the US Attorney’s office in South Florida to defend Epstein, who was being prosecuted by the US Attorney’s office in South Florida. Epstein got a sweetheart deal. I’m not accusing Magistrate Reinhart of anything. I’m just saying.

Could you imagine what would happen if that Epstein list got out? The people on that list can surely imagine it. It would be even bigger than McCarthyism. Call it Epsteinism.

https://www.amazon.ca/One-Nation-Under-Blackmail-Intelligence/dp/1634243013

One Nation Under Blackmail: The Sordid Union Between Intelligence and Crime that Gave Rise to Jeffrey Epstein, VOL.1 Paperback

One Nation Under Blackmail is a damning indictment of the consequences resulting from the nearly century old relationship between both US and Israeli intelligence and the organized criminal network known as the National Crime Syndicate. This book specifically explores how that nexus between intelligence and organized crime directly developed the sexual blackmail tactics and networks that would later enable the sexual blackmail operation and other crimes of deceased pedophile and sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. Other books on Jeffrey Epstein focus on the depraved nature of his crimes, his wealth, and his most famous/politically-connected friends and acquaintances. This book, in contrast, reveals the extent to which Epstein’s activities were state-sponsored through an exploration of his intelligence connections.

The_Deplorable says

Score so far:

Bill Gates: 36
Bill Clinton: 27

There's to way to prove this. I've said it before, they fly into STT and take a boat or yacht over to the island. No documentation. Fine they were listed on the flight plan land on mainland St. Thomas, it doesn't mean they went to Little St James. As I've said over and over it really was bullet proof. You don't even need a passport.

Not defending them, as I think they're scumbags. But this idea of some ritualistic fucking of young people (note people not just girls) is going to be impossible to prove. The other thing I've noted on this thread I believe is that the age of consent is much lower in Europe. They could just go there to screw a 14-15 year old. It would make no sense to do it on US territory.

This is why we'll never know. Just because you fly on someones plane that is a criminal doesn't mean you are. I've flow on private planes and jets. If they have 1 kilo of cocaine, am I guilty by association if I had no clue? We already know the prominent names from flight logs. Not a single charge. No prosecutor will attempt it. You can't charge someone of a crime for flying on a plane. Again, a perfect setup. I don't think we'll ever find out the full scope of it.

WookieMan says

"You can't charge someone of a crime for flying on a plane."

True, unless it is one specific plane. The Epstein plane flying to Epstein island.