patrick.net

Wife of Stephen Miller:

Trump should call Greenland "Kalaallit Nunaat" to respect the natives.

I think we need Iceland, too, just to be safe.

Denmark has a dark past in Greenland, a past it would rather you didn't talk about, child abduction, forced sterilisation, forced Labour and exploitation.

Denmark’s possession of Greenland, whose actual name is Kalaallit Nunaat, began as a mission to reclaim land from "lost" Norsemen but evolved into centuries of systemic cultural erasure and economic exploitation of the Indigenous Inuit.

In 1721, Danish missionary Hans Egede arrived to "save" Norse descendants from paganism. Finding only Inuit, he instead forcibly converted them to Lutheranism, denouncing traditional shamans and rituals. Denmark then established a state trade monopoly in 1776, treating the island as a profitable hub for whale blubber and minerals while keeping the indigenous Inuit isolated and dependent.

In 1953, Denmark formally annexed Greenland as a "county" to avoid UN decolonization requirements, this led to a period of brutal social engineering.

This era also saw the sinister "Little Danes" experiment, where the state abducted Inuit children and relocated them to Denmark to be molded into a Danish-speaking elite, causing lifelong trauma. Simultaneously, thousands of Inuit were forcibly moved from ancestral hunting grounds into concrete apartment blocks to centralize labor for Danish controlled factories, devastating traditional kinship networks.

Between 1966 and 1970, Danish authorities further violated Indigenous rights by secretly fitting over 4,500 Inuit women and girls, some as young as 12 with IUDs without consent to curb the population.

While Greenland gained Home Rule in 1979 and Self-Government in 2009, the legacy of Danish control persists.

As of today, Greenland remains a territory under the "Danish Crown" with some International bodies continimg to pressure Denmark to address its colonial legacy of racial discrimination and provide justice for the victims of the "Spiral Case" and forced child removals.

So as the Danes shout about "US Imperialism" bear in mind how they came to control this region far from Danish shores, and how brutally they exploited it's people for the "Crown"
https://x.com/BowesChay/status/2007777786417631721?s=20

Also, Eirik the Red was an outlaw from Norway who became an outlaw in Iceland. Iceland at the time was a rough frontier community with no King, just an Althing, a sort of community law court.

Greenland was found and discovered (there were no Inuit there, either earlier "Dorsets" or their "Thule" successors) by free Vikingkar. No Dannebrog was flown, at least for the first few generations; eventually a bishop was sent from Denmark and perhaps there was some nominal allegiance/trading privileges with the Kingdom of Denmark. Norway (inc. Iceland) eventually waived claims to Greenland to Denmark.

But Denmark did not "Discover" Greenland.

Maybe we should include Denmark, too, just to be safe.

Donroe the KommieKunts and election fraudsters out of Canada. Break the back of the City of London and the criminal Commonwealth. They are the source of our miseries and have been at war through their CCP proxies. Cousins my ass.

Maybe we should annex Scandinavia just to be safe. It would be a short missile ride over to the City of London.

She's already providing Trump with irresistible incentives to annex Greenland.

Since we're going for Finland, maybe annexing the Baltic States would also be a good security measure.

Israel has just made a bid to move the Palestinians to the northernmost tip of Greenland after Trump buys it.

Wait, Carney has 32 Cuban Intel/SpecOps personnel too? Wouldn't be surprised!

In other words: protectorate status

Ring a loud bell and see how many start looking like lizards.

I can't forget the vid when Carney was being asked stressful questions by journalists and he started talking in some kind of bizarre language in a non sequitur. That was over the top, like an open display of demonic possession.

Ppl r hallucinating on Greenland’s mineral wealth.
Exploring and mining in the Arctic is a literal hellscape. The constraints r insane and the costs to overcome 'em r mooning way past imagination.

Geologically, permafrost is a nightmare. Ground’s frozen solid—normal drilling hits a wall. Building stable foundations for gear is a massive money pit.

Ops r cooked too. Constant darkness for months in winter. Working 24/7 under floodlights craters efficiency and spikes accident risk.

At -40°C to -50°C, metal gets brittle and just snaps. U need custom alloy gear, and keeping fuel/lube from freezing is a constant battle. The diesel/power burn just to keep lights on and engines warm is eye-watering. Immediate Opex blow-up.

Logistics? Absolute disaster. It’s not about digging it out; it’s about moving it.

Zero roads or rails. Everything moves by heli, light plane, or ship. Moving ore to a port costs multiples of what normal mines pay. Plus, zero local smelters. U gotta ship it across oceans, burning time and cash.

Shipping windows r tiny. Some coasts r only accessible a few months a year. U either pay for icebreakers or pray the 1-year supply/export window doesn’t get wrecked by bad weather. If the ship misses the slot, the whole year is a wash.

Look at the Citronen Fjord Zn project at 83°N. It’s one of the world's biggest undeveloped Zn-Pb deposits, but it's 2,100km north of Nuuk. Total isolation.

They get a 3-month window to move a year’s worth of cargo. One bad storm and the project is bricked for the season. Ironbark Zinc tried for ages, but it just got flipped to Dubai-based Almeera Ventures. That’s a clear signal on how brutal the Capex and funding hurdles r.

The core issue: does the margin even justify the risk? Building a mine w/ zero infra is a Capex black hole.
Think global warming helps? Think again.

Thawing permafrost is actually trashing existing infra and roads. Extreme weather just jacks up Opex even more.

We’re talking 10-15 yrs from discovery to first ore. If commodity prices crater in between, u’re left holding a stranded asset.

This is the reality of mining. Arctic dev is 10x harder than u think. Plz, stop living in a dream world. There’s a reason Denmark wasn't aggressive on dev.

U really think they held back just to protect the Inuit? Give me a break. Money always trumps ESG in the end, no matter the optics.

U can spam 'self-sufficiency' and 'strategy' all u want, but u can't meme ur way past physics and economics. Wake up.
https://x.com/CRUDEOIL231/status/2008648982181085506?s=20

It's not even blond bush, it's a bunch of Inuits.

TheAntiPanicanLearingCenter says

keeping fuel/lube from freezing is a constant battle

My dad was in Alaska during the Korean war, and said they left the trucks running 24/7 because otherwise the fuel lines would freeze.

And that when you started to drive a truck, there was a flat spot frozen into the tire that would make it a very bumpy ride until the tires warmed up from the friction.

And that you could throw a bucket of water out the door and ice would hit the ground.

The Woo of Greenland. It was always strange that the Thule base was named that, since Thule was the German occult society.

https://x.com/prolotario1/status/2008669862734766161?s=46

Minerals? A bear to mine in remote arctic regions for reasons covered above.

Russia-China? A secondary reason, maybe.

The real reason is the same as 1941. More about denying it as an EU base, once/if they wake up from feminized mentality OR become the Emirate of Europe. Note that one of the best things the early Caliphates had going for them were the huge number of UNconverted Greek speakers producing wealth and know-how for the Arab leadership of rube desert bandits. There were centuries before they all converted, and in fact some smart Caliphs discouraged conversion, preferring the infidels to pay extra tax.

Also:
1. A last ditch attempt to get Europeans to do more than quote UN Excessive Farting Convention Rule #3b13a
2. Encircle increasingly obtuse Canada.

"If you'd come to me in friendship, this scum who ruined your daughter would be suffering this very day. And if by some chance an honest man like yourself made enemies they would become my enemies. And then, they would fear you."

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/revolutionary-wednesday-january-7



Not that I want the US to subjugate the world, but I understand the strategy.

And why the fuck do they have the Republic of Ireland as part of Britain?

Total population of Greenland: 56,542. If we gave every Greenlander $200,000, that $12 Billion.

Offer them 50 billion dollars (a pimple on our budget) if they agree to become a US territory, like Guam. No Political issues, like 2 new Senators and a house seat, that would be required from statehood. The territorial governor is locally elected. Every citizen gets $200K, the rest into Greenland's coffers, with a proviso that another $12 Billion goes into a non-taxable retiree fund for all Citizens. That still leaves $25B for them to spend on......whatever.

We pump money into their economy by deploying an anti-ICBM shield with perpetual maintenance. Long-term jobs and money into their economy. (Just look where Russia would have to launch missiles at the USA - it's mostly over Greenland.)

For reference: Denmark's annual block grant (bloktilskud) to Greenland, the primary aid form:

~$672 million USD in 2024–2025 (4.3 billion DKK).
~$641 million USD in 2023 (4.1 billion DKK).
~$609–641 million USD in recent years (2020s).
Fixed at ~$531–594 million USD post-2009 (3.4–3.8 billion DKK, inflation-adjusted).
~$380 million USD in 1994 (2.4 billion DKK).

Historical data before 1994 limited; formalized grant increased after 1979 Home Rule. Additional Danish costs (defense, judiciary) add ~$156–312 million USD yearly. Nominal amounts rose over time; as % of Greenland's GDP fell from ~30% (early 2000s) to ~19–20% recently.

Denmark Crash Build of New Fleet to Protect Greenland

Danish military preparing to protect Greenland from Donroe Imperialism.

MolotovCocktail says

Pure libtarded Bullshit from Ted. The US invaded Grenada without Congressional Approval, too.

I don't recall any servicemembers being subject to the USCMJ.

Also, the President, not Congress, is the highest authority in the military. Libbies love to quote Articles 90-92, which deal with disobeying or striking superior officers and NCOs, combined with the "Captain's Cover" to administer punishment for various offenses like reporting in a high state of inebriation (which in early times meant near blind) or failure to demonstrate clothng articles (sold for money to buy hookers with in Honolulu)

How the fuck did we go from riding the ass of any Russian or Chinese plane or boat that got too close to Norway or the Philipines... to actually DEBATING whether we should totally be in charge of North America?

Whether or not somebody is hyperinterventionist or isolationist or moderate, completely controlling North America and preventing any foreign power from establishing so much as an igloo here is a no fucking brainer.

rocketjoe79 says

Total population of Greenland: 56,542. If we gave every Greenlander $200,000, that $12 Billion.

Offer them 50 billion dollars (a pimple on our budget) if they agree to become a US territory, like Guam. No Political issues, like 2 new Senators and a house seat, that would be required from statehood. The territorial governor is locally elected. Every citizen gets $200K, the rest into Greenland's coffers, with a proviso that another $12 Billion goes into a non-taxable retiree fund for all Citizens. That still leaves $25B for them to spend on......whatever.

I like it.

Greenland is not an EU member, by the way. It is explicity outside of the EU. Something to keep in mind when Eurotards whine.

Also, according to a 2009 law, it's Parliament has the right to declare independence.

It would cost the USA about $70B, or about one third of all aid it sent to Ukraine, to give every Greenlander $1,000,000 a piece, regardless of age.

And we would get the largest island in the world, strategically useful, and what little surveying that was historically done has already turned up a ton of resources (inc. rare earths) within the first few miles off the coastline.

Face it, everything about it is going to be mischaracterized by the chronic frauds to the eye teeth. It's a security zone. It is alleged all manner of submarine ports and tunnels already exist there of the CCP/Russians etc. preparing to dig in there permanently, and the Danes will never have the wherewithal to develop any resources, anyway.

One way or another, Trump will get it, so they may as well just bargain hardy rather than pretend there is some righteous fake patriotic cause associated.